Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM. Marcus Martin, proceeding pro se, filed a late notice of appeal. In response to a show cause order, he claims that he did not receive timely notice of the underlying judgment. But Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6) requires Martin to seek relief in the district court. He did not. We therefore

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0014p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DUZUAN LESTER, │ Plaintiff-Appella

01/24/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 25, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA STEVEN SULLIVAN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 117338 Steven W. Sword, Judge ___________________________________

NUMBER 13-97-312-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ CCR, INC., W. T. YOUNG, et al., Appellants,

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Justin B. Sullivan, a former employee of Dumont Aircraft Charter, LLC, brings this lawsuit against his former employer, its affiliate, Dumont Aviation, LLC, and the owner of the businesses, Kevin Wargo (together "Defendants" or "Dumont"). Mr. Sullivan claims that the Defendants failed to pay him compensation for the work he did. The Defendants have responded with countercla

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Clay Selleck (“Selleck”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury awarded him $10,000 on his claim against Keith M. Evans Insurance, Inc. (“Evans Insurance”) for violating the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”). As authorized by the MMPA, the trial court then granted Selleck his reasonable attorneys’ f

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Blessey Marine Services, Inc. (Blessey) brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The district court declined to decide as a matter of law whether nine individual plaintiffs (collectively the Plaintiffs), former vesseLbased tankermen on Blessey barges, who brought suit under the Fai

216 Wis.2d 61 (1997) 573 N.W.2d 888 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ronald KEITH, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 96-2332. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs July 9, 1997. Decided December 30, 1997. *65 On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was

Cook, J. Appellant presents this court with eight propositions of law, raising issues as to both the guilt and sentencing phases of his trial. In accordance with the mandate of R.C. 2929.05(A), we have considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. We have previously held that R.C. 2929.05 does not require this court to address and d

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 514.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KEITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Keith, 1997-Ohio-367.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when. (No. 96-1149—Submitted March 4, 1997—Decided October 1, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Crawford County, No. 3-94-14. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Kevin Ke

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #014 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 22nd day of March, 2024 are as follows: BY Genovese, J.: 2023-CC-01194 DOUGLAS BIENVENU, ET AL. VS. DEFENDANT 1 AND DEFENDANT 2 #87184 C/W JOHN DOE, ET AL. VS. DEFENDANT 1 AND DEFENDANT 2 #87515 (Parish of St. Martin) RE

BUCKLEY, Circuit Judge: AT & T Information Systems petitions for review of a Federal Communications Commission order requiring it to reimburse the cost of refurbishing certain equipment transferred to it as a result of the court-ordered breakup of American Telephone and Telegraph Company. As we find the FCC’s actions inadequately explained and inconsistent with case law, we grant the petition and remand to the agency for

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 95-CT-00233-SCT KEITH DEWAYNE COHEN, a/k/a KELO v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/08/95 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ELZY JONATHAN SMITH, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Steven Keith Hatch was convicted of two counts of first degree murder in Oklahoma state court. Oklahoma courts twice sentenced him to death and then vacated those sentences.1 After a third state court judge imposed the death penalty on petitioner, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. Petitioner then sought a writ of habeas corpus in federal district co

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 25, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TRACY J. BROOKS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for McMinn County No. 09-071 Amy A. Reedy, Judge No. E2010-01509-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 22, 2011 The appellant, Tracy J. Brooks, pled guilty in the McMinn County Circuit court to driving under

210 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 2000) R. SCOTT SEXTON; CYNTHIA W. SEXTON; KRIS KISTLER; PATRICIA KISTLER; GARY DUDLEY; JOSEPH FIORINO; RICHARD POMEROY; JOHN REIFSCHNEIDER; MYRNA DUDLEY; CAROLYN FIORINO; JANICE POMEROY; LEE REIFSCHNEIDER; Plaintiffs/Appelleesv.RONALD MARTIN, Defendant/AppellantCITY OF DES PERES, MISSOURI Defendant. No. 99-1511 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUI

474 F.3d 236 Michael W. BENGE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.David JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 05-3122. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 1, 2006. Decided and Filed: January 16, 2007. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Randall L. Porter, Public Defender's Office, Ohio Publ

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

42 Cal.3d 437 (1986) 722 P.2d 905 229 Cal. Rptr. 131 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DARYLE KEITH MARTIN, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. Crim. 24474. Supreme Court of California. August 21, 1986. *440 COUNSEL William J. Kopeny, under appointment by the Supreme C