Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Keith Witherspoon”
State v. Witherspoonpublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
Witherspoon v. Statepublic domain
¶ 1. Anthony Witherspoon was convicted of manslaughter. After Witherspoon's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, he filed a motion under the Mississippi Uniform Post-Conviction Relief Act seeking a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The Pike County Circuit Court denied the motion. We reversed and remanded on the grounds that the lower court applied the wrong legal standard in denying Witherspoon's motion. See Witherspoon v.
People v. Witherspoonpublic domain
164 Ill. App.3d 362 (1987) 517 N.E.2d 1169 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEITH WITHERSPOON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-86-0640. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed December 30, 1987. *363 G. Joseph Weller and Robert C. Cooper, both of State Appellate Defe
State v. Witherspoonpublic domain
640 S.E.2d 60 (2006) STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Marquez WITHERSPOON. No. 418P06. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 14, 2006. Daniel F. Read, Durham, for Witherspoon. David N. Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC. ORDER Upon consideration of the petition filed on
State v. Witherspoonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Witherspoon, 2013-Ohio-1000.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. 2012-P-0075 - vs - : COLLIN L. WITHERSPOON,
Prevost, Jeffery Keithpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,039 JEFFERY KEITH PREVOST, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 1414421 IN THE 351 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY N EWELL, J., delive
Romero v. Witherspoonpublic domain
7 F.Supp.2d 808 (1998) Julian ROMERO, et ux v. Emmanuel WITHERSPOON, M.D. Civil Action No. 96-2395-A. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. May 7, 1998. *809 Charles Henry Munsterman, Alexandria, LA, H. Alston Johnson, III, Phelps, Dunbar, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Julian Romero, Diane Romero.
Milam, Blaine Keithpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,379 BLAINE KEITH MILAM, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. CR09-066 IN THE 4TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT RUSK COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., delivered the opini
Milam, Blaine Keithpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,379
Witherspoon v. Statepublic domain
Appeal No. 13950 from Judgment dated November 5, 1992, Melvin Keith Starrett, Ruling Judge, Pike County Circuit Court. Before PRATHER, P.J., and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and MILLS, JJ. Affirmed.
Kinney v. Keithpublic domain
128 P.3d 297 (2005) Stephen H. KINNEY and Rocky Mountain Bluebird Ranch, a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Raymond E. KEITH, Brenda M. Keith, Thomas K. Colbert, Virginia N. Colbert, and Mountain Gravel and Construction Co., a/k/a Mountain Gravel and Construction, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04CA1406. Colorado Court of Appeals, Division V. <
Keith v. Kinneypublic domain
140 P.3d 141 (2005) Raymond E. KEITH and Brenda Keith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Thomas K. Colbert and Virginia N. Colbert, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. Stephen H. KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04CA0923. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. December 1, 2005. Certiorari Denied June 26, 2006. *144 Kars
Keith v. Mitchellpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0237p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant, - KEVIN KEITH,
Kevin Keith v. Betty Mitchell, Wardenpublic domain
CLAY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. While I concur in Parts II.D and II.E of the majority’s opinion, pertaining to Petitioner’s affidavit of indigency and the cumulative error claims respectively, I dissent from Parts II.A and II.C. I would instead hold that Petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel during both the mitigation phase of tr
Patrick v. Brittpublic domain
364 S.C. 508 (2005) 613 S.E.2d 541 Jane PATRICK, Respondent, v. Keith E. BRITT, Appellant. No. 3992. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted March 1, 2005. Decided May 23, 2005. *509 Mark Alan Leiendecker, of Summerville, for Appellant. James B. Richardson, of Columbia; and Jo
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00283-CV Keith Edward Deinhart, III, Appellant v. Vali Anna McGrath-Stroatman, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
State v. Keithpublic domain
Cook, J. Appellant presents this court with eight propositions of law, raising issues as to both the guilt and sentencing phases of his trial. In accordance with the mandate of R.C. 2929.05(A), we have considered each of appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. We have previously held that R.C. 2929.05 does not require this court to address and d
Witherspoon v. United Statespublic domain
838 F.2d 803 Jerry WITHERSPOON, Individually, and as the mother and nextfriend on behalf of Eric Gerald Gaines, Irish Yvette Gaines,Corey Ann Gaines, Michael George Gaines, Nanyamka AkweteKambui, Mawusi Akwokwo Kambui, and Kamu Sababu Kambui,Minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-4104. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Cir
Witherspoon v. United Statespublic domain
GEE, Circuit Judge: In the fall of 1981, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had been seeking the perpetrators of the infamous Brinks robbery and murders. Seven days after it took place, two of the suspected terrorists had been sighted at appellant Witherspoon’s rural residence in Copiah County, Mississippi; and the authorities made preparations to apprehend them. As Judge Davis noted, in an unpublished opinion disposing of
State v. Keithpublic domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 514.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KEITH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Keith, 1997-Ohio-367.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when. (No. 96-1149—Submitted March 4, 1997—Decided October 1, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Crawford County, No. 3-94-14. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Kevin Ke