Cases

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court *1230(Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered June 3, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court *1230(Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered June 3, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Onondaga

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 9 KA 10-01372 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAYSON M. KELLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

560 N.W.2d 365 (1996) 220 Mich. App. 614 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GOIKE, Marjorie Goike, Paul C. Stewart, and Carolee Stewart, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 176456. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 18, 1996, at Lansing. Decided December 27, 1996, at 9:05 a.m. Released f

People v Shields (2020 NY Slip Op 01767) People v Shields 2020 NY Slip Op 01767 Decided on March 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered February 15, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law, the plea is vaca

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered February 15, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and on the law, the plea is vaca

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1076 KA 13-00991 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHNNY BOYDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SY

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Appellant Augustine F. Wadian appeals a finding of contempt of court rendered against him by the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division. Appellee Robin Wadian is appellant's former spouse. The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows. {¶ 2} The parties were married on July 4, 1993. Two chi

862 A.2d 752 (2004) Thor S. SVEGE, Jr., a minor, by his grandmother and Guardian Alice G. Svege; Briana Lee Svege, a minor, by her grandmother and Guardian Alice G. Svege; and the Estate of Thor S. Svege, Sr., Deceased, by Alice G. Svege, Administratrix, Appellants, v. INTERSTATE SAFETY SERVICE, INC., Stabler Construction Co.—JV-Eastern Industries, Inc., Stabler Construction Co., Eastern Industries, Inc., Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Turnpike Com

150 F.Supp.2d 1365 (2000) TELECOMM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., et. al, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants v. SIEMENS ROLM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant/Counterplaintiff, No. CIV. A. 1:95CV649WBH. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 10, 2000. *1366 John Kirk Train, III, Michael P. Kenny, John Philip Fry,

612 S.E.2d 589 (2005) 272 Ga. App. 402 BLAKE v. The STATE. No. A04A1745. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 23, 2005. *590 Charles Flinn, Carnesale & Delan, Decatur, for Appellant. Jeffrey Brickman, District Attorney, Alison Burleson, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellee. ADAMS, Judg

868 So.2d 1286 (2004) Donna L. PACE and Philip J. Feldman, Appellants, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL Board and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Appellees. No. 1D03-1674. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 6, 2004. *1287 Jay M. Levy, P.A., Miami, and John J. Feldman of Feldman & Getz, LLP, North Miami Be

66 F.Supp.2d 1306 (1998) TELECOMM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.; Realcom Office Communication; Nova USA Telecommunications Co.; American Telecom Corporation; DD Hawkins Communications, Inc.; CMS Communications, Inc.; Start Technologies Corporation; Olde York Valley Inn, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. SIEMENS ROLM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. No. 1:95-CV-694-WBH. United States Distri

[Cite as Strother v. Columbus, 2022-Ohio-4097.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Orenthal Strother, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 22AP-7 v. : (M.C. No. 21CVE-2559) City of Columbus et al., :

People v Moran (2025 NY Slip Op 07413) People v Moran 2025 NY Slip Op 07413 Decided on December 31, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected an

880 A.2d 54 (2005) H. William DeWEESE, House Minority Leader and Member of the House Rules Committee, and Mike Veon, Democratic Whip of the House of Representatives, Petitioners v. Honorable C. Michael WEAVER Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 5, 2005. Decided July 26, 2005.

The defendants appealed from a judgment rendered by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County in favor of the plaintiff for the possession of personal property. [1] Said judgment is based upon allegations of the complaint and findings of fact reciting merely that the plaintiff was the mortgagee and entitled to the immediate possession of the property described, and that the defendants were at all times in possession thereof; that the plaintiff had demanded possession bu

Argued January 29, 1937. The Attorney General petitioned this Court to open the decree in and rehear the case of Kelley v. Earle, et al, 320 Pa. 449, wherein an injunction was granted. The first hearing was on original jurisdiction to restrain the General State Authority, a corporation organized under the provisions of the Act of June 28, 1935, P. L. 452, from entering into a proposed agreement of lease with the State under that Act and from general

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00383-CV JIM HERBERT HAMILTON JR. APPELLANT V. EMIL PECHACEK APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY