Cases

Taranto, Circuit Judge. *1350 ThermoLife International, LLC exclusively licensed four patents from the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. It filed infringement suits, asserting selected claims of four patents, against numerous defendants, including Hi-Tech Pharm

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JACOB BRYAN, Appellant, v. GALLEY MAID MARINE PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Off Road Innovations, a/k/a ORI, Appellee. No. 4D18-3699 [January 15, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for

ACCEPTED 01-15-00625-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

527 F.Supp. 1114 (1981) LAKE CARRIERS' ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Frank J. KELLEY, Michigan Attorney General, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 36194. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. December 16, 1981. *1115 Scott H. Elder, Cleveland, Ohio, Prentiss M. Brown, Jr., St. Ignace, Mich., for plaintiffs.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

634 F.Supp. 842 (1986) In re UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION GAS PLANT DISASTER AT BHOPAL, INDIA IN DECEMBER, 1984. Misc. No. 21-38 (JFK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 12, 1986. As Amended June 10, 1986. *843 Robins, Zelle, Larson & Kaplan, Minneapolis, Michael V. Ciresi, Bruce A. Finzen, Roberta B. Wal

395 F.Supp. 735 (1975) John T. PHILLIPS, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant. Corrado Frank TUMMINELLO, Plaintiff, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant. Charles Phillip FREITAG, Plaintiff, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant. Carroll Charles MYERS, Plaintiff, v. CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. Nos. 73-303-H, 73-3

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge: The central ruling in this case holds that private actions to vindicate rights asserted under the Federal Trade Commission Act may not be maintained. Claiming to represent the interests of the consuming public and advertising audience,

Plaintiffs, by their undersigned counsel, hereby certify pursuant to L.Civ.R. 11.2 that the matters in controversy are not the subject of any other action pending in any court or of any pending arbitration or administrative proceeding, with the exception of the following: (1) Telebrands Corp. v. National Express, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 12-cv-06671-FSH-JBC; (2)

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [11] STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs filed a class-action complaint against Defendant Whirlpool Corporation. The Plaintiffs allege causes of action related to Whirlpool’s “AquaLift” oven self-cleaning technology. Whirlpool moved to dismiss some of the counts for failure to state a claim. For the

FILED Jan 21 2020, 8:33 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEFF BOARDMAN; DENNIS RANKIN; Nos. 15-35257 ROBERT SEITZ; TODD L. WHALEY; 15-35504 SOUTH BAY WILD, INC.; LLOYD D. WHALEY; MISS SARAH, LLC; MY D.C. No. FISHERIES, INC., CV 15-0108 MC Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION PACIFIC SEAFOOD GROUP; OCEAN GOLD HOLDING CO., INC.; DULCICH I

WALLACH, Circuit Judge, dissenting-in-part. I agree with the majority’s holdings with respect to standing, infringement, and willfulness. However, in an effort to respect the presumption against the extraterritorial application of United States law, the majority erroneously declines to consider WesternGeco L.L.C.’s (“WesternGeco”) lost foreign sales when determining damages for infringement under 35 U.S.C.

610 F.3d 371 (2010) MEDICAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amy HELLMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-2887. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 29, 2009. Decided June 21, 2010. *372 Michael A. Dorelli, Attorney, Hoover Hull LLP, Indianapolis, IN, David C. Jense

ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE: *478Currently pending before the Court are the parties' motions for summary judgment (D.I. 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 316, 356, 411) and Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony and opinions. (D.I. 317, 321, 322, 327). The parties have fully briefed the issues (D.I. 314, 318, 320, 323, 324, 328, 351, 353,

21-95 Khan v. Yale Univ. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 21-95-cv SAIFULLAH KHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YALE UNIVERSITY, PETER SALOVEY, JONATHON HALLOWAY, MARVIN CHUN, JOE GORDON, DAVID POST, MARK SOLOMON, ANN KUHLMAN, LYNN COO

MEMORANDUM OPINION GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In this lawsuit,- plaintiff Stephen B. Pence has brought claims against defendant GEE Group, Inc. (“GEE”), for which Pence formerly .served as chairman, seeking indemnification for attorney’s fees and other expenses. GEE has moved-to dismiss under the - doctrine of forum non conve-niens, or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to t

*823 MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiff has brought derivative claims and class claims on behalf of a Delaware corporation and its shareholders against certain directors and officers, alleging that the board of directors made awards that exceeded the limits of a shareholder-approved compensation plan. The company has m

Case: 21-50352 Document: 00516443696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 23, 2022

464 B.R. 421 (2011) In re THE MORTGAGE STORE, INC., Debtor. Dane S. Field, Plaintiff, v. George W. Lindell; Karen K. Lindell; Mano-Y&M, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership; Hector & Alicia Investments, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; Hector Guerra; John Does 1-50; Jane Does 1-50; Doe Partnerships 1-50; Doe Corporations 1-50; Doe Entities 1-50; and Doe Governmental Entities 1-50, Defendants. Civil No. 11-004