⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Kelli Prichett Holland”

District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-03-14 · Published · cited 8× · 297 F.R.D. 622; 2014 WL 1281750
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate, filed October 8, 2013, in Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLC, No. CIV 12-0040 JB/LFG (“Anderson”) (Doe. 134); and (ii) the identical Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate, filed October 9, 2013, in Abraham, v. WPX Energ
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-12-31 · Published · cited 21× · 312 F.R.D. 620; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175079; 2015 WL 9703298
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Class Certification, filed *623June 1, 2015 (Doc. 288)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on October 23, 2015. The primary issue is whether the Court should recons
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-06-24 · Published · cited 22× · 308 F.R.D. 410; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86226; 2015 WL 4040616
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Scheduling Conference, filed March 31, 2015 (Doc. 279)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on May 12, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should reopen discovery on issues relevant only to class certification; and (ii) whether the Court should set a sch
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-05-16 · Published · cited 75× · 27 F. Supp. 3d 1188; 2014 WL 2750652; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82677
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, filed October 18, 2013 (Doe. 145)(“MTD”). The Court held a hearing on February 21, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court, should convert the MTD into a motion for summary judgment, and whether it