Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION ¶ 1 This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. ¶ 2 The district court entered a divorce decree on July 5, 2005. On July 12, 2005, Appellant Carl Mark Dent (Husband) filed a timely motion to amend the judgment and decree of divorce. On August 1, 2005, before the court ruled on the motion to amend, Husband filed a notice of appeal. Following an August 4, 2005 hearing, the district court orally ru

5 A.3d 1281 (2010) Latoya L. BRICKUS, Appellant v. Raymond T. DENT, Appellee. No. 1648 EDA 2009 Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 12, 2010. Filed October 1, 2010. *1282 Donna S. Ross, Ardmore, for appellant. Raymond Dent, appellee pro se. No brief filed. BEFORE: BOWES, GANTMAN, and KELL

837 A.2d 571 (2003) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Monica Lynette DENT, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted March 3, 2003. Filed November 25, 2003. *574 Candace Cain, Public Defender, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Michael W. Streily, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for Com., appellee. Before

129 F.Supp.2d 1311 (2001) Ira DENT, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL MOGUL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CV 00-BU-1227-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. January 25, 2001. Jeffrey W. Bennitt, Bennitt & Bufford, LLC, Birmingham, AL, Kenneth F. Gray, Jr., Stephen B. Griffin & Associates, Hoover, AL, for Ira Dent, plaintiff. Jay D. St. C

George W. Draper III, Judge Ryan W. Amorine (hereinafter, “Amo-rine”) seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the trial court (hereinafter, “Respondent”) from holding a probation revocation hearing after Amorine’s term of probation expired. This Court issued a preliminary writ of prohibition, which it now makes permanent. This Court finds that Respondent did not have the authority

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-20-00044-CR TAJUAN MURTEZ DENT, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 415th District Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 12/01/2020 08:08 AM CST - 198 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 29 Nebraska Appellate Reports KELLY v. KELLY Cite as 29 Neb. App. 198 Kirsten W. Kelly,

No. 401 June 12, 2024 235 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON MIKE SPENCER WASHINGTON, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 15CV10000; A165796

No. 203 March 12, 2025 597 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON TARA ELLYSSIA ZYST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defendant-Respondent. Marion County Circuit Court 02C15732; A164370 Don A. Dickey, Judge. A

Justice Robinson, dissenting. I must respectfully but most vigorously record my dissent from the majority's opinion in this case. It is my position that Karen Dent failed to point to any evidence, direct and/or circumstantial, on the basis of which one could infer that PRRC, Inc. d/b/a Price Rite (Price Rite), had actual or constructive knowledge of the spill which purportedly caused her to fall and sustain an injury. Fo

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

404 A.2d 165 (1979) Maurice E. DENT, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 13798. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 11, 1979. Decided July 16, 1979. *167 Daniel Burke, Washington, D. C., for appellant. F. Joseph Warin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Earl J. Silb

208 N.W.2d 734 (1973) Clyde E. DENT, Jr., by His Executrix, Theda E. Dent, Appellant, v. Marjorie Dent CASAGA, Respondent. No. 43831. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 1, 1973. *735 Harry H. Peterson, Minneapolis, for appellant. Daniel G. LaPorte and Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, Akron, Ohio, for respondent.

857 A.2d 952 (2004) 85 Conn.App. 455 Stephen G. DENT v. Allen F. LOVEJOY et al. No. 23009. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued March 29, 2004. Decided October 12, 2004. *955 Michael R. Pontrelli, pro hac vice, with whom was James R. Fogarty, Greenwich, for the appellant-appellee (plaint

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

299 Argued and submitted March 8, 2019; reversed and remanded with instructions for the post-conviction court to grant petitioner relief on Counts 2 to 10 and Count 12, otherwise affirmed May 20, 2020 PATRICK ALLEN McMILLAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brandon KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Defe

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 6, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 141919

IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 25S-PC-108 Apr 30 2025, 11:00 am CLERK McKinley Kelly, Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 27, 2013, denying the petition to annul and vacate respondents’ determination, dated September 27, 2011, which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Credible evidence

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1353 ROBERT BEVIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS and JASON ARRES, Defendants-Appellees, and THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,