Cases

06/12/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 20, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANA KELLY TEASLEY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Polk County No. 23-CR-46 Sandra N.C. Donaghy, Judge ___________________________________

177 Ga. App. 554 (1986) 340 S.E.2d 32 TEASLEY v. THE STATE. 71313. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided January 23, 1986. John W. Davis, Jr., for appellant. David L. Lomenick, Jr., District Attorney, Roland Enloe, David J. Dunn, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. Appellant was convict

243 Ga. 561 (1979) 255 S.E.2d 57 TEASLEY v. MATHIS. 34701. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted March 16, 1979. Decided April 24, 1979. Lamar W. Sizemore, Jr., for appellant. Michael S. Reeves, Donald M. Fain, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee. UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice. L

*1468 ORDER BRITT, District Judge. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff responded to the motion, and defendants replied. This matter is thus ripe for disposition. I. FACTS At approximately 9:00 p.m. on 2 July 1993, officers of the Fayetteville Police Depa

274 F.3d 148 (4th Cir. 2001) DANIEL ADAMS; ROBERT C. ADKISSON; THOMAS W. ADLER; MATTHEW ALBRIGHT; KANYIA J. ANDERSON; BRADLEY D. ANTONS; LONNIE E. ARTIS; JAMES S. BAILIE; JOHN BANKS; JAMES R. BARKER; KAREN MARIE BARNES; CHARLENE A. BEAHM; JAMES T. BLOUNT; WILLIAM BRADY; LARRY D. BRENEMAN; FREDERICK M. BROCCOLO; MICHAEL B. CARDEN; WILLIAM R. CARMAN; WILLIAM H. CARROLL; MARC W. CHADWICK; DAVID CHERESKIN; ROBERT E. CHERRY; RICHARD CHILDRESS; MARK COLE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR BARBARA S. THOMAS, ) No. ED111064 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) the City of St. Louis

03/08/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 15, 2021 TIMOTHY A. BAXTER v. GRADY PERRY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 16811 Christopher V. Sockwell, Chancellor _________________________________

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Westinghouse Credit Corporation, by petition for writ of mandamus, requests an order of this court directing the district court to recall its remand and to exercise jurisdiction over certain federal securities and Oklahoma state law claims asserted against Westinghouse by plaintiffs. Because Westinghouse has not shown entitlement to the relief requested, the petition is denied.

MYERS, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. On January 19, 2000, Elgandy filed her complaint against Boyd Mississippi, Inc., d/b/a Silver Star Resort and Casino. The court allowed Elgandy to correct her complaint by changing the name of the defendant to Boyd Mississippi, Inc. The complaint set forth two counts for recovery. Count I stated a slip and fall claim, and Count II stated a negligence claim involving ants in E

Evans, J. Laura M. Sadler instituted a suit against Isham A. Teasley to recover certain funds which she alleged had been entrusted to him as a confidential steward or factor, for the purpose of collecting, investing, and taking care of the same for her benefit, and for which she had made demand upon him, but which he had refused to pay over to her. The defendant pleaded that the funds were not delivered to him as a steward or con

BRYANT, Judge. A motion to suppress evidence should be granted where the information presented in the search warrant has not been independently verified or corroborated by the requesting officer. Where a trial court makes competent findings of fact and conclusions of law in granting a motion to suppress evidence, we will not disturb those findings on appeal. On 29 September 2011, Detective Justin Hastings

991 F.2d 807 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. WE

Birdsong, Presiding Judge. This appeal was originally filed in the Supreme Court and was transferred to this court. The case arose out of suit for damages for the attempted rape of plaintiff while she was recovering from spinal surgery in the Medical College of Georgia Hospital, by a prison inmate who had been previously convicted of assault with intent to rape and who had been admitted to the hospital for treatment. Plainti

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2025 UT 47 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH TROY GARDNER, Appellee, v. TYLER NORMAN, Appellant. No. 202

#30868-r-PJD 2025 S.D. 63 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** JEREMY COYLE and ABBEY COYLE, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. KENNETH MCFARLAND and KELLI MCFARLAND, Defendants and Appellants. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

987 F.2d 682 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8248 WESTINGHOUSE CREDIT CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.Ralph G. THOMPSON, Chief Judge of the United States DistrictCourt for the Western District of Oklahoma, Respondent.Susan N. Cook; Estelle James; Carla Love; Robert M. Love;Jeff Stallsmith; Bettye Hayes Teasley; Nancy L. Thompson;John E. Thompson; Fred A. Sheriff; Robin E. Sheriff;John B. Hamilton; Rona

177 Ga. App. 514 (1986) 339 S.E.2d 752 EIG v. SAVAGE (two cases). 71446, 71447. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided January 7, 1986. Rehearing Denied January 22, 1986. Albert E. Jones, for appellant. J. Alfred Johnson, Julian M. Treadaway, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Presiding Judge. Declarator

Clarke, Chief Justice. Appellee Daniel Conkle was injured in October 1988, after the tractor trailer truck he was driving overturned when its right frame rail broke. Conkle and his wife filed suit against appellant Mack Trucks, Inc. (Mack), the manufacturer of the truck, alleging that the frame rail broke as the result of a fatigue crack, and that Mack was liable under product liability theories of strict liability and negli

Filed: January 31, 2002 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 00-2269(L) (CA-99-1851) Daniel Adams, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus City of Norfolk, Virginia, Defendant - Appellant.

*476 NAZARIAN, J. Walter Paul Bishop appeals his conviction by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Harford County, after he confessed to the contract murder of William “Ray” Porter on March 1, 2010. Mr. Bishop admitted to police that Mr. Porter’s wife, Karla Por