Cases

938 N.E.2d 1181 (2010) NAPCOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA Successor as a Result of a Merger With Bank One NA, Formerly Known as First Chicago, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-09-0179. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 19, 2010. *1183 Peter D. Sullivan, Stephen R. Swofford, Renee O'

Brown, Judge. Don Wellman appeals, pro se, from the trial court's order granting JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA's ("Chase") motion to dismiss his complaint seeking injunctive and declaratory relief "to restrain foreclosure, assignment and title fraud, and to quiet title."1 For the reasons explained below, we vacate the trial court's order dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim und

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 21, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143509

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 22, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 145493

ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge. The above matter came before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated November 17, 2014. Plaintiff objects to the recommendation that this Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); L

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., ANDREWS and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules July 23,

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 12, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Reheari

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 9, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 144690

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan March 26, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 28, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143852

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 22, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice 141434

[Cite as JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Carpenter, 2025-Ohio-295.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30024 : v.

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Glenna Bryan, appeals as of right an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, in this quiet title action. Finding no errors warranting reversal, we affirm. I. BASIC FACTS The trial court’s order granting summary disposition for defendant set forth the background facts of this case, none of which is in dispute:

708 F.Supp.2d 348 (2010) HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A. et al., Defendants. In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation. This Document Relates to: City of Los Angeles v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.; 08 Civ. 10351; City of Riverside, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., 09 Civ. 10102; City of Stockton v. Bank of America, N.A., et al., Civ. 10350; Contra Costa County

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal arises out of the district court’s denial of Defendant-Appellant Seth Nichamoffs motion to dismiss based on his assertion of Texas’s attorney immunity. Plaintiff-Appellee Jodie Kelly’s complaint alleges that Nicha-moff conspired with two other Defendants to defraud her into purchasing undervalued shares of Legacy Aut

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Mary Frances Hopson and Bobby Wayne Hopson filed their original complaint in this cause on July 18, 2012 against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Bank USA, N.A. and numerous Chase affiliates and employees, and against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Deutsche Bank), Prommis Solution, LLC, The Bank of New York and J.M. Adj

Opinion RICHMAN, J. Plaintiff Scott Call Jolley and Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) entered into a construction loan agreement in 2006, which eventually encountered problems due to alleged failures by WaMu to properly disburse construction funds. As Jolley was continuing to attempt to salvage the transaction, WaMu went into receivership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and in September 2008

FILED 15-0131 2/17/2015 1:27:24 PM tex-4174474 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CL

Hudson Val. Bank, N.A. v Eagle Trading (2022 NY Slip Op 04956) Hudson Val. Bank, N.A. v Eagle Trading 2022 NY Slip Op 04956 Decided on August 17, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations in this case. Plaintiff filed objections on February 5, 2014, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCE