Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kelly v. National Lloyds Insurance Company”
in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 15-0591 444444444444 IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, WARDLAW CLAIMS SERVICE, INC. AND IDEAL ADJUSTING, INC., RELATORS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 44444444444444444444444444
898 F.Supp. 381 (1995) CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, Plaintiff, Tupelo Public School District, Tupelo, Mississippi, Defendant, v. GULF NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Third Party Defendant. No. 1:92CV317-S-D. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division. September 22, 1995. *382
in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.public domain
NUMBER 13-15-00219-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, WARDLAW CLAIMS SERVICE INC. AND IDEAL ADJUSTING, INC. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Sentry Select Insurance v. Alaska National Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM** The district court granted an interlocutory declaratory judgment ruling that, with respect to the Okada accident, the P & I policy did not impose a duty to defend on Sentry Select Insurance Company (Sentry), and the MEL policy did impose a duty to defend on Alaska National Insurance Co. (Alaska). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(3), and affirm. Sentry establi
32 F.3d 851 63 USLW 2122, 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 513 RHONE-POULENC RORER INC. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company,Petitioners,v.The HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation,v.AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY INSURANCE; AIU Insurance Company;American Centennial Insurance Company; Birmingham FireInsurance Company; First State Insurance Company; GraniteState Insurance Company; Hartford In
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No.: N22C-08-488 EMD CCLD FEDEX COR
480 F.Supp.2d 1182 (2007) OAKLAND-ALAMEDA COUNTY COLISEUM, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Underwriters, Lloyd's of London, Executive Risk Indemnity Company, Gulf Insurance, Zurich American Insurance Company, formerly known as Zurich Insurance Company, Admiral Insurance, RLI Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company, Federal Insurance Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
Beverly Smith v. Citadel Insurance Company as Successor to Gramercy Insurance Company and Goauto Insurance Companypublic domain
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #45 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 22nd day of October, 2019, are as follows: BY JOHNSON, C.J.: 2019-CC-00052 BEVERLY SMITH VS. CITADEL INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUCCESSOR TO GRAMERCY INSURANCE COMPANY AND GOAUTO INSURANCE COMPANY (Parish of East Baton Rouge)
in Re State Farm Lloydspublic domain
Justice Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court. Electronic discovery plays an increasingly significant role in litigation and, often, at significant expense. Given the prevalence of discoverable electronic data, discovery disputes involving electronically stored information (ESI) are a growing litigation concern. With few occasions to enter the
Pineoak Builders Inc v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Company and Mid Continental Casualty Companypublic domain
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed July 6, 2006 Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed July 6, 2006. In The<
Opinion issued February 6, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00727-CV ——————————— IN RE AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for
Wendy Schreiber v. State Farm Lloydspublic domain
OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice ■ In this insurance-coverage case, the trial court rendered judgment that the insured take nothing based on the jury’s verdict in favor of the insurer. The verdict included a finding that the fire that destroyed the insured’s home was intentionally caused with the insured’s prior knowledge or participation. On ap
in Re Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Companypublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00515-CV In re Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company petitions for writ of mandamus, urging that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to sever and abate the real party in int
NUMBER 13-21-00209-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ANSELMO M. CALTZONSING, Appellee. On appeal from the 377th District Court
Wendy Schreiber v. State Farm Lloydspublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-14-00010-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/29
2024 WI App 36 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2023AP2109 Complete Title of Case: BADGERLAND RESTORATION & REMODELING, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Opinion Filed: May 9, 2024 Subm
Eleanor Crose v. Humana Insurance Companypublic domain
JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: Eleanor Crose appeals the district court’s summary judgment for Humana Insurance Company on her claims for breach of contract and unfair insurance practices. Because summary judgment was warranted, we AFFIRM. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 23, 2013, while Eleanor Crose attended a conc
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-20-00088-CV Barbara Burgess, Appellant v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 19-0925-C368, THE HONORABLE RICK J. KENNON, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION
SECTION: G(4) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Plaintiff Celebration Church, Inc.’s (“Celebration Church”) *927“Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the -Issue of Coverage”1- and Defendant United . National Insurance Company’s (“UNIC”) “Motion for Su
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-6240-10T1 IMO INDUSTRIES INC., APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, September 30, 2014 v. A