Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 263 OPINION INTRODUCTION Petitioner George Sarka, M.D., was employed as a primary care physician at the student health services' Arthur Ashe Student Health and Wellness Center (SHS) at the University of California at Los Angeles (the University). He filed a gr

Opinion RUSHING, P. J. Appellant Veronica Gonzalez (Mother) was reported for child abuse after she spanked her 12-year-old daughter, A.P. (Daughter), using a wooden spoon with enough force to produce visible bruises. The Santa Clara County Department of Social Services (Department) concluded that the report was “substantiated,” and submitted it to the state Depar

Opinion HUFFMAN, J. In this appeal of a judgment denying a petition for writ of administrative mandate, appellants Anserv Insurance Services Inc., and its two officers Earl C. Nelson and W. Brian Hames (collectively Anserv) challenge the decision of the superior court that upheld an administrative decision in favor of the real party in interest, the California Department of Insurance (the Department or DOI), re

99 Cal.Rptr.2d 357 (2001) 83 Cal.App.4th 197 ANSERV INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. J. Clark KELSO, as Acting Insurance Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent. No. D033195. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. August 7, 2000. *359 Marks & Golia, Davide G

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (“PEER”) has sued the United States Department of the Interior, Secretary of the Interior Kenneth Salazar, the United States National Park Service (“NPS”), and NPS Director Jonathan Jarvis (collectively “defendants”), claiming violat

ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-155V Filed: November 2, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NICOLE MATTEN as parent and legal * PUBLISHED Representative of the Estate of her * Daughter, KM * *

COWEN, Circuit Judge. This is a securities class action lawsuit brought on behalf of shareholders of the Chubb Corporation (“Chubb”) against Chubb, Executive Risk, Inc. (“Executive Risk”), and several Chubb and Executive Risk officers. Plaintiffs aver that Defendants defrauded investors by artificially inflating the value of Chubb’s common stock through accounting manipulations and false statements designed to effectuate a sto

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: April 30, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * * MICHELLE GREEN, * PUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 16-008V

946 F.2d 710 WIND RIVER MINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America; Manuel Lujan, Jr.; DelosJacobson, Director of the Bureau of LandManagement, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-55731. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1991.*Decided Oct. 8, 1991.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiffs Reverge Anselmo and Seven Hills Land and Cattle Company, LLC (“Seven Hills”) have brought this action against the County of Shasta, California (“Shasta County”) and Russ Mull alleging claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of plain

394 F.3d 126 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; New York State Common Retirement Fund; The* Butler Wick Trust Company, The Executor of the Estate of John N. Teeple, Deceased, Appellantsv.The CHUBB CORPORATION; Dean R. O'Hare; David B. Kelso; Henry B. Schram; Executive Risk Inc.; Stephen J. Sills; Robert H. Kullas; Robert V.

RADER, Circuit Judge. The Department of Energy Board of Contract Appeals (Board) denied claims by the cities of Burbank, Glendale, and Pasadena, California (the Cities) asserting that the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) miscalculated the rate it charged them for power under various contracts. Cities of Burbank, Glendale, & Pasadena, Cal., EBCA Nos

595 F.Supp.2d 425 (2009) Joan IVAN and Angel Jazikoff, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX; Middlesex County Sheriff's Department; Sheriff Joseph C. Spicuzzo, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Middlesex County Sheriff's Department; Undersheriff Angelo Falcone, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff's Officer of the Middlesex County Sheriff's Department; Lieutenant Donald Blount, individually and in his offic

Filed 11/20/15 Certified for Publication 12/21/15 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE HPT IHG-2 PROPERTIES TRUST et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, G049695 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00608509) CITY OF ANAHEIM et al.,

Filed 6/30/14; pub. order 7/25/14 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CITIZENS OPPOSING A DANGEROUS ENVIRONMENT, F067567 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV-275009) v. OPINION COUNTY OF KERN et al., Defen

OPINION BUSH, Judge. This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, IV and V is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts I and IV-VI of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is also granted in part and denied in part.

50 Cal.Rptr.3d 822 (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 977 Henry PARRA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents. Edmund Cota et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. City and County of San Francisco et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A112331. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two.

723 F.Supp. 1363 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Guy D. McCOY, Jr., and Frank Hellum, Plaintiffs, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL REVIEW, INC.; Jo Ellen H. Ross, Larry Magna; Margaret Shea; and Alan Snodgrass, Defendants. No. C 88-3659 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 14, 1989. *1364 Thomas Steel, M. Jane L