Cases

DeALMEIDA, P.J.T.C. This is the court’s opinion with respect to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a vehicle leasing company, raises several issues relating to the Director, Division of Taxation’s determination of plaintiffs Corporation Business Tax (“CBT”) obligations for its fiscal years 2003 through 2006. For the reasons explained more fully below, the court concludes that: (1) New Jersey’s decoupli

Donna Frazelle-Foster v. Preston H. Foster No. 2716, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Divorce > Grounds > Cruelty of Treatment The Maryland General Assembly and the courts understand domestic abuse to encompass verbal and psychological abuse in addition to physical violence. In Maryland, therefore, “cruelty of treatment” as a cause for divorce under Maryland Code (1984, 2020 Repl. Vol.), Family Law Article (“FL”), sections 7-102(a)(1) and 7-103(a)(6) may include verbal and psychological a

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 656–747 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

607 F.Supp.2d 840 (2009) Eddie & Joyce BYERS, Plaintiffs, v. LINCOLN ELECTRIC CO., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:04-CV-17033. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 20, 2009. *841 D. John Neese, Jr., D. Grant Kaiser, Kaiser Law Firm, Houston, TX, David W. Shelton, Oxford, MS, John R. Climaco, Climac

The third-party defendant, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company ("Liberty Mutual"), appeals from a judgment entered in favor the third-party plaintiff, William J. Parish. In January 1992, Sollie Pate had sued Parish in regard to damage to Pate's wrecker truck. Parish, in turn, filed a third-party claim against his insurer, Liberty Mutual, alleging that Liberty Mutual had to provide him with a defense in the Pate lawsuit and that Liberty Mutual would be liable for any damages (

547 U.S. 332 (2006) DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. et al. v. CUNO et al. No. 04-1704. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 1, 2006. Decided May 15, 2006.[*] *336 Theodore B. Olson argued the cause for petitioners in No. 04-1704. With him on the briefs for petitioner Daimler-Chrysler Corporation w

*268Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. Pro se prisoners can file notices of appeal to the federal courts of appeals only by delivering them to prison authorities for forwarding to the appropriate district court. The question we decide in this case is whether under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) such notices are to b

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 32 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 33 The appellant was convicted for the second degree murder of his mother and sentenced to life imprisonment. His defense was insanit

989 P.2d 10 (1999) 329 Or. 86 Dwaine SCHIFFER and White City Development, Respondents on Review, v. UNITED GROCERS, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Petitioner on Review. (CC 94-2411-L-2; CA A87467; SC S43670) Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 14, 1997. Reassigned February 3, 1998. Decided July 15, 1999.<

Joseph R. Kainrad, Judge. This matter is before the court upon motions for reconsideration filed by both parties. The court has reviewed the pleadings and its prior order in this case and has decided to reconsider its prior decision. Pending before the court for reconsideration are defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. This decision will supplant the decisi

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. The defendant-appellant, Andrew Ford, Sr., appeals from a modified judgment of conviction which reduced his three concurrent sentences of imprisonment from nine to four years. 1 These sentences were imposed upon his conviction by a plea of guilty to three counts of arson in violation of District of

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. Preliminary Note Before us is the appeal of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (OCF) from the judgment of the district court of the Virgin Islands awarding William Dunn $500,000 in compensatory damages and $2 million in punitive damages. A panel of this court heard argument on OCF’s appeal on April 22, 1992 and issued an opinion affirmin

429 F.Supp. 1359 (1977) Frances Joy CAPERS et al., each Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD et al., Defendants. No. 72 Civ. 3168. United States District Court, S. D. New York. April 13, 1977. *1360 *1361 White & Case, New

ACCEPTED 15-25-00067-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/20/2025 11:50 AM NO. 15-25-00067-CV CHRISTOPHER

PER CURIAM: Appellant Alvera M. Aldabe filed a pro se civil rights complaint in federal district court. The complaint alleged that during her protracted divorce proceedings, the seventeen named appellees, including various judges and attorneys involved in the litigation, conspired to deprive her of several constitutional rights. The district court dismissed

262 N.W.2d 684 (1977) Jerome CORNFELDT, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Phyllis Cornfeldt, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lyle TONGEN, Respondent, Ronald Beals, et al., Respondents, Robert C. Knutson, Respondent, Ayerst Laboratories, Incorporated, Respondent. No. 46074. Supreme Court of Minnesota. December 30, 1977. *689 R

Woodard appeals from denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. Originally he was indicted May 27, 1963, on three separate true bills, each charging second degree burglary. The next day, May 28, Woodard, attended by counsel hired by his mother, plead guilty to each indictment and asked for probation. The trial judge denied probation May 31. Thereupon, no appeal having been noted, Woodard was taken from the Dale County jail to a place of detention within

The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrer to a bill in equity. The bill seeks the sale, for division of proceeds, of a tract of land in Geneva County which is alleged to be owned in equal parts by the complainant C. Wilmer Bedsole and the respondents, Vergil L. Bedsole, Blanche Bedsole Woods, and George Bedsole, Jr., subject to the homestead and dower interests of the complainant Banney L. Bedsole. It is averred in the bill that the complainant Banney L. Bedsole de

500 So.2d 1232 (1986) Robert Lee TARVER, Jr. v. STATE. 4 Div. 504. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. June 10, 1986. Rehearing Denied July 15, 1986. *1235 Robert P. Lane, of Phillips & Funderburk, Phenix City, for appellant. Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Mary Ellen Fike Forehand and William D

ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM