Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Kenneth Geer and Denise Geer”
City of Winston-Salem v. Slatepublic domain
647 S.E.2d 643 (2007) CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Plaintiff, v. Douglas A. SLATE and wife, Shirley Slate, Defendants. City of Winston-Salem, Plaintiff, v. Gary M. Slate and wife, Denise Slate; Douglas A. Slate and wife, Shirley Slate; Pamela S. Kennedy and husband, Rick Kennedy; and R. Kenneth Babb, Administrator, Defendants. Nos. COA06-1015, COA06-1161. Court of Appeals of North Carolina.</
Ashley v. City of Lexingtonpublic domain
704 S.E.2d 529 (2011) Ralph ASHLEY, Jean Ashley, Alexander Augoustides, Carolyn Auman, Luther T. Barber, Sylvia Barber, D.H. Beam, Jay Belk, Pam Belk, Anthony J. Bolo, Jr., Marion J. Bonnom, Keith Bost, Sherry Bost, Ricky Boyd, Michael P. Bralkowski, Rhonda W. Bralkowski, Jim Buchanan, Betsy Buchanan, Peggy Burchett, Jerry Burkhart, Jeri Burkhart, Bobby Byerly, Patsy Byerly, Jim Cameron, Betsy Cameron, Brad Cates, Jodi Cates, Cory Cooper, Amanda Cooper,
Newcomb v. County of Carteretpublic domain
701 S.E.2d 325 (2010) Robert Timberlake NEWCOMB, III, Scott D. Nafe, Gary T. Davis, and wife, Karen J. Davis, and Pelham Jones, Plaintiffs v. COUNTY OF CARTERET, United States of America, George Brown, Julian M. Brown, Julian Brown, Jr., Earl Chadwick, Temple Chadwick, Gloria Davis, Randy Frye, Norman Fulcher, Joe O'Neal Garner, Robert Guthrie, Sammy *326 Guthrie, Gray Harris, Maureen Harris, Myron Harris, Tam
State v. Hudginspublic domain
606 S.E.2d 443 (2005) STATE of North Carolina v. Milas Kennedy HUDGINS, Defendant. No. COA03-1485. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 4, 2005. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Hal F. Askins and Assistant Attorney General Patricia A. Duffy, for the State. L. Jayne Stowers, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant. <
In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel
959 F.Supp. 1338 (1997) Noah LOGUE, by and through his parents and legal guardians Kenneth and Gretchen LOGUE, Plaintiffs, v. SHAWNEE MISSION PUBLIC SCHOOL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 512, Defendant. No. 96-2218-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 24, 1997. *1339 *1340
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M
In re Ephedra Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to show causation is denied; their motion to exclude the opinions of Wesley Dennis, M.D. is granted in part and denied in part; and their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to individual defendant Michnal for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied.
In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*67MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES — PRIVATE PLAINTIFFS and “MINORITY” STATES McGLYNN, District Judge. In Kramer v. Scientific Control Corporation, 534 F.2d 1085 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Kramer, 429 U.S. 830, 97 S.Ct. 90, 50 L.Ed.2d 94 (1976), our Court of Appeals,