Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J. In this case, which arises out of a 2007 car collision, the circuit court refused the plaintiff's request to instruct the jury that the plaintiff's motives in pursuing the suit were immaterial to the merits of the negligence claim. In closing argument, the defendant argued at length that the plaintiff had lied about being involved in the collision in

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11943 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ JAN 28, 20

789 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2011) MINNESOTA MAJORITY, Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota North Star Tea Party Patriots, Election Integrity Watch, Susan Jeffers, individually and as an election judge, Dorothy Fleming, Jeff Davis, Dan McGrath and Andy Cilek, Plaintiffs, v. Joe MANSKY in his individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Rachel M. Smith in her individual and official capacity as the Elections Manager for Henn

CALLAHAN, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, Peter Choi ("Husband"), appeals the judgment of the Summit County Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Division. For the reasons set forth below, this Court affirms. I. {¶ 2} Husband and Appellee, Miehyun Claire Choi ("Wife"), were married in 1978. They have three adult children as a result of the marriage.

CHOY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of defendant-appellee Frankwell Bullion, Ltd. and its affiliates (“Frankwell”). The district court held that Frankwell was exempted from the jurisdiction of the CFTC by the so-called “Treasury Amendment” to the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) because it was not a “board of trade” within the mean

F~ED July 18, 2016 1N COURT OF \\ ORKIRS ' COl\IPENSATION

SUMMARY ORDER In this portion of a tandem appeal, Kenneth Francis appeals from an amended judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Holwell, J.) on September 6, 2011. For the following reasons, we affirm. On December 15, 2008, Francis plead guilty to one count of access device fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(5) and one count of consp

CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur as to affirming the Board’s dismissal of the complaint against Reliable. I respectfully dissent, however, as to enforcing the Board’s order against Dependable. The majority affirms the Board’s finding that Hartman committed an unfair labor practice because he completed his ter

3 F.Supp.2d 104 (1998) AMGEN, INC. Plaintiff, v. HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC. and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc. Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-10814-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 15, 1998. *105 Michael R. Gottfried, Dennis D. Allegretti, Burns & Levinson, Boston, MA, Douglass C. Hochstetler, Edwa

890 P.2d 291 (1995) 78 Hawai`i 54 STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert Sui Ung LAU, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Stanley MYERS, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa KANESHIRO, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tadao SEKI, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appel

Heinrich v Serens (2023 NY Slip Op 03086) Heinrich v Serens 2023 NY Slip Op 03086 Decided on June 9, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

CHOY, Circuit Judge: This case, which is one of first impression in this circuit, calls upon us to determine who should receive reinsurance proceeds upon the insolvency of a reinsured company. We affirm the judgment below, which found that the statutory receiver was the appropriate recipient of such proceeds. 1. Introduction Reinsurance1 is a speci

89 F.Supp.2d 270 (2000) Olof FRANZON, M.D. and Women's Medical & Surgical Health Care, P.C., Plaintiffs, v. MASSENA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Board of Managers of Massena Memorial Hospital, Medical Executive Committee of Massena Memorial Hospital, Jayant J. Jhaveri, M.D., James B. Watson, Bedros Bakirtzian, Christine Rowe-Button, M.D., Sateesh *271 K. Goswami, M.D., Steven Schwam, M.D., Melchiore L. Buscemi, M.D.

NOONAN, Circuit Judge: Bankruptcy is an intensely practical affair. Bankruptcy seeks fair treatment for everyone. These two principles animate and guide the law within the statutory framework set by the Bankruptcy Code. In this case they appear to clash. On closer examination of the facts, the clash is chimerical. Weinstein, Eisen and Weiss (the Firm) ap

OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. Appellant Gary Roby was convicted of aiding and abetting the crimes of first-degree premeditated murder, first-degree murder while committing aggravated robbery, and second-degree intentional murder for his role in the shooting death of Marlizza McIntyre. We affirmed Roby’s conviction on direct appeal. State v. Roby (Roby I), 463 N.W.2d 506 (Minn.1990). In this case, Roby

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, Chief Judge. Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) is embroiled in complex patent litigation with Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (“Hoechst”) and Transka-ryotic Therapies, Inc. (“Transkaryotie”). Sweeping discovery requests have been met by equally adroit countermoves. Discovery motions fall as the gentle rain. Amidst this preliminary grappling, counsel for Hoechst has made the misstep fea

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601 David Barber, in his capacity as District Attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Alabama, appeals from a judgment in favor of the Jefferson County Racing Association, Inc., d/b/a the Birmingham Race Course ("the JCRA"), and Innovative Sweepstakes Systems, Inc. ("Innovative") (referred to collectively as

DECISION & ORDER McAVOY, Chief Judge. The instant matter was the subject of this Court’s prior Memorandum—Decision & Orders (“MDOs”) dated December 29, 1998, see Franzon v. Massena Memorial Hosp., 32 F.Supp.2d 528 (N.D.N.Y.1998) (“Franzon II”), and Franzon v. Massena Memorial Hosp., 977 F.Supp. 160 (N.D.N.Y.1997), familiarity with which is assumed. The Court will not now

732 N.W.2d 298 (2007) Ronald STAEHELI, Relator, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, Respondent. No. A06-1146. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 22, 2007. *302 Ronald Staeheli, Eagan, MN, pro se relator. John J. Choi, St. Paul City Attorney, Portia Hampton-Flowers, Assistant City Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for respondent. Considered