Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kenneth R. Perry”
Perry v. Reinpublic domain
ORTEGA, J., concurring. Despite my disagreement with the result reached by the majority, I concur because I believe we are bound by our decision in Perry v. Rein, 187 Or App 572, 582-83, 71 P3d 81 (2003) (Perry I), in which we treated the disposition of the underlying claim against plaintiff as a voluntary dismissal, rather than a set
Everett Perry v. Kenneth McGinnispublic domain
KEITH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which CLAY, J., joined. ALAN *600E. NORRIS, J. (pp.-), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Everett Perry (“Perry”) appeals from the district court’s decisions on Defendants-Appellees’
Perry v. Hernandezpublic domain
DE MUNIZ, S. J. Plaintiff prevailed on a claim under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA), ORS 90.100-ORS 90.875, and sought an award of attorney fees. ORS 90.255. The trial court denied attorney fees on the ground that plaintiffs counsel had not sufficiently apportioned his fees between plaintiffs fee-bearing claim and those claims for which attorney fees were not authorized. We conclude that the trial court erred i
Perry v. Reinpublic domain
71 P.3d 81 (2003) 187 Or. App. 572 Kenneth R. PERRY, Appellant, v. Scott J. REIN; Dressler, Rein, Evans & Sestanovich, LLP, a California limited liability partnership; Stuart I. Teicher; and Sussman, Shank, Wapnick, Caplan & Stiles, LLP, an Oregon limited liability partnership, Respondents. 0009-09797; A116471. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued
Perry v. Cohenpublic domain
285 S.W.3d 137 (2009) Emory B. PERRY, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee, David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley P. Nordgren, Craig S. Nordgren, Rex Madion, William J. Drasky, Samantha Paulson, Kenneth Paulson, and Fred Ananian, Appellants, v. Darryl R. COHEN, Andrew M. Brown; Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, L.L.P.; and Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C., Appellees. No. 03-05-00786-CV.
Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. The State of Illinois has issued social worker Maureen Kevin a license that entitles her to practice as a "Dul evaluator"that is, to assess the prospects of recidivism by persons who have been convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugs. Courts maintain lists of approved "Dul evaluators" who may be appointed by judges to provide
Perry v. Schwarzeneggerpublic domain
ORDER VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge. The defendant-intervenors, who are the official proponents of Proposition 8 (“proponents”) move for a protective order against the requests contained in one of plaintiffs’ first set of document requests. Doc # 187. Proponents object to plaintiffs’ request no 8, which seeks “[a]ll versions of any documents that constitute communications relating to Proposition 8, betwee
Perry v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'npublic domain
On Second Application for Rehearing PITTMAN, Judge. This court’s opinion of March 9, 2012, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. James M. Perry appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) in an ejectment action. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History
Perry v. Cohenpublic domain
272 S.W.3d 661 (2007) Emory B. PERRY, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee, David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley P. Nordgren, Craig S. Nordgren, Rex Madion, William J. Drasky, Samantha Paulson, Kenneth Paulson, and Fred Ananian, Appellants, v. Darryl R. COHEN; Andrew M. Brown; Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, L.L.P.; and Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C., Appellees. No. 03-05-00786-CV.
Perry v. Brownpublic domain
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Prior to November 4, 2008, the California Constitution guaranteed the right to marry to opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples alike. On that day, the People of California adopted Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry. We consider whether that amendment violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United
Camco International, Inc. v. Perry R. Bass, Inc.public domain
OPINION Appellants Camco International, Inc. and Camco, Inc. (collectively "Camco") appeal a summary judgment granted for Perry R. Bass, Inc. and the Sid W. Richardson Foundation (hereinafter "Bass-Richardson") in a dispute over whether certain royalty payments were due under United Kingdom patent law. At issue is whether the transfer of rights under the patent from Bass-Richardson to Camco was a license or an assignment. Because we conclude the trial
Perry v. Schwarzeneggerpublic domain
704 F.Supp.2d 921 (2010) Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar
Opinion issued March 11, 2010 In The Court of Appeals
In Re Perrypublic domain
194 B.R. 875 (1996) In re Jerome Kenneth PERRY, Debtor. No. CV-95-5594-REC. United States District Court, E.D. California. February 7, 1996. *876 Jerry Namba, Forrest and McLaughlin, Pinedale, CA, for Forrest McLaughlin. Thomas L. Holtz, Jr., McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte and Carruth, Fresno, CA, for Linda Ekstrom Stanley and J
Kenneth R. v. Hassanpublic domain
ORDER STEVEN J. McAULIFFE, District Judge. The plaintiffs and intervenor claim that the State of New Hampshire unnecessarily institutionalizes people with serious mental illnesses, in violation of the integration mandates of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131(2), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794. The named plaintiffs seek certification of an appropriate class, doc
Perry v. Shawpublic domain
106 Cal.Rptr.2d 70 (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 658 Sandra PERRY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. William SHAW et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B133608. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One. April 23, 2001. Review Denied August 22, 2001.[*] *71 Garcia, Emmons, Maranga &
Siesta Village Market, LLC v. Perrypublic domain
530 F.Supp.2d 848 (2008) SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET, LLC, d/b/a Siesta Market, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rick PERRY, Governor of Texas, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 3:06-CV-0585-D, 4:06-CV-0232-D. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. January 14, 2008. *849 *850
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Perrypublic domain
623 F.Supp.2d 409 (2008) COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Lewis PERRY, Yoland Perry, Alexander Road Association, Inc., Anthony Vulpone, Estate of Anthony Vulpone, Robert Antalocy, Thomas Harris, Dolores A. Korz, John P. Kilduff, Kenneth Lee d/b/a "I Can Get It For You Wholesale," Sallie E. Harmon, Paul Ruggiero, Michelle Ruggiero, Terrance Donnary, Andrew Perna, Karen Perna, Robert McMahon, Carl McMahon, Kelvin M. Lewis, March
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REMAND NO. 03-05-00786-CV Emory B. Perry, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee, David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley P. Nordgren, Craig S. Nordgren, Rex Madion, William J. Drasky, Samantha Paulson, Kenneth Paulson, and Fred Ananian, Appellants
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REMAND NO. 03-05-00786-CV