Cases

389 B.R. 481 (2008) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590-DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. May 15, 2008. *483 Alison Kirshner, Bryan A. Merryman, Charles C. Kline, Claudine Columbres, Daniel Ginsberg, Erika Ruiz, Erin L. Connolly, Felix J. Lopez, Forrest W. Hunter, Frank L. Eaton,

MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge. . BACKGROUND This cause comes before the court on the defendant’s motions for . summary judgment based on federal preemption [81] and on state law grounds [83]. ■ The court has *898reviewed the briefs, exhibits, and relevant law and is prepared to rule.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1802 Filed March 19, 2025 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF JEFFREY ADAM THOENE AND KERRI LYNN THOENE Upon the Petition of JEFFREY ADAM THOENE, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning KERRI LYNN THOENE, n/k/a KERRI LYNN WEBBER, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County,

MCDONALD, Judge. Chad and Bonnie Seely married in 1994 and divorced in 2012 pursuant to a stipulated decree. The stipulated decree provided for joint legal custody and joint physical care of the parties' four children, M.S. (born 1995), N.S. (born 1997), H.S. (born 2001), and J.S. (born 2003), with neither party to pay child support to the other. Subsequently, Chad relocated from the

751 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2010) FLEMING BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 10-CV-432-GKF-TLW. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. November 12, 2010. Kenneth Leonard Brune, Timothy Edward Houchin, Brune Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. James Donald Johnson, Kerry R. Lewis, Rhodes Hieronymus Jones Tucker &

598 F.3d 208 (2010) Ned COMER; Brenda Comer; Eric Haygood, husband of Brenda Haygood; Brenda Haygood; Larry Hunter, husband of Sandra L. Hunter; Sandra L. Hunter; Mitchell Kisielweski, husband of Johanna Kisielweski; Johanna Kisielweski; Elliott Roumain, husband of Rosemary Roumain; Rosemary Roumain; Judy Olson; David Lain, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MURPHY OIL USA; Universal Oil Products (UOP); Shell Oil Company; Exxonmobil Corp.; AES Corp.; Alle

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

348 B.R. 725 (2006) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590-DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. August 9, 2006. *726 *727 Craig H. Averch, Michelle C. Campbell, Paul E. Godinez, Ronald Kevin Gorsich, Kerri A. Lyman, White & Case, L.L.P., Los Ang

Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals 730 21 NEBRASKA APPELLATE REPORTS releasing the funds became final and appealable. John has not perfected an appeal from that order. Because John has not separately appealed from the order releasing nonexempt funds, we do not have jurisdiction to con- sider his arguments related to that order. V. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated herein, we do not have jurisdiction of John’s appeal as it relates to the modification ord

354 B.R. 113 (2006) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590 DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. November 21, 2006. *114 *115 *116 *117 *118

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

Moyer, C.J. {¶ 1} This case originated as an election contest challenging the results of the November 2, 2004 election in Ohio for President and Vice-President of the United States. The contestors, 37 Ohio residents who allegedly had voted in the presidential election, filed an election-contest petition pursuant to R.C. Chapter 3515. The named contestees were President George W. Bush, Vice-President Richard Cheney, Bush-Cheney

113 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2000) SUPREME BEEF PROCESSORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 3:99CV2713G. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. May 25, 2000. *1049 James Winford Bowen, Jenkins & Gilchrist, Dallas, TX, Robert G. Hibbert, McDermott, Will & Emery,

607 F.3d 1049 (2010) Ned COMER; Brenda Comer; Eric Haygood, husband of Brenda Haygood; Brenda Haygood; Larry Hunter, husband of Sandra L. Hunter; Sandra L. Hunter; Mitchell Kisielweski, husband of Johanna Kisielweski; Johanna Kisielweski; Elliott Roumain, husband of Rosemary Roumain; Rosemary Roumain; Judy Olson; David Lain, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MURPHY OIL USA; Universal Oil Products (UOP); Shell Oil Company; Exxonmobil Corp.; AES Corp.; All

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0354p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

348 B.R. 720 (2006) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. No. 03-46590-DML-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. June 23, 2006. *721 Craig H. Averch, Michelle C. Campbell, Paul E. Godinez, Ronald Kevin Gorsich, Kerri A. Lyman, White & Case, L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, Douglas P. Baumstein, Howard S. B

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: A group of Mississippi Gulf Coast residents and property owners (“Plaintiffs”) alleged that emissions by energy companies (“Defendants”) contributed to global warming, which intensified Hurricane Katrina, which, in turn, damaged their property. The district court dismissed their claims with prejudice. A panel of this court reversed, in part, the district court’s dismissal. Before mandate could issue,

927 N.E.2d 349 (2010) In the Matter of Failure to Comply with CONTINUING Legal EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS and/or Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees. No. 94S00-1005-MS-259. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 14, 2010. ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN ATTORNEYS FOR FAILURE TO PAY ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES and/or FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIR

689 F.Supp. 541 (1988) Karen PINCHBACK v. ARMISTEAD HOMES CORPORATION, Diane Dailey Civ. No. B-81-1334. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 23, 1988. *542 Leslie L. Gladstone, Baltimore, Md., and Kerry Alan Scanlon, Robert F. Leibenluft, William A. Bradford, Jr., and Bradley Saxton, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.<