Cases

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 80 Docket: Ken-23-198 Argued: October 9, 2024 Decided: December 19, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. DYLAN KETCHAM HORTON, J. [¶1] Dylan Ketcham appeals from a judgment of convi

20-14 Ronald Ketcham v. City of Mount Vernon et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2020 6 7 (Argued: December 11, 2020 Decided: March 29, 2021) 8 9 10

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Plosky, H. E.), entered July 9, 2002, which, upon a decision of the same court dated June 13, 2002, made after a hearing, inter alia, denied his petition for downward modification of his child support obligation and found that he willfully failed to obey an order of child s

780 N.E.2d 1171 (2003) John L. KETCHAM, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 84A05-0204-CR-160. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 9, 2003. *1174 Robert D. Hepburn, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Nicole M. Schuster, Deputy Attorney General,

93 N.Y.2d 416 (1999) 712 N.E.2d 1238 690 N.Y.S.2d 874 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM KETCHAM, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued April 29, 1999. Decided June 3, 1999. *417 Svetlana M. Kornfeind, New York City, and M. S

SHANGLER, Presiding Judge. The secretary of state certified that two initiative petitions to amend the Missouri Constitution by limiting the terms of the Missouri’s state and federal legislators, respectively, had received sufficient signatures to qualify for the ballot. The plaintiffs Ketcham and Jackson, citizens of Missouri, and Missourians for Responsible Government, a campaign committee duly organized and existing for the

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: Basil Ketcham 1 appeals his sentence. Ketcham argues that the district court erred when it failed to group the four counts of his conviction pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 3D1.2.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING After further consideration of this case, the original opinion is withdrawn, and the following is substituted as the opinion of the Court. *Page 731 Celeste Barrett and Carolyn Allan formed a partnership, Cedar Bark Lot 14 (hereinafter "Cedar Bark"), which purchased a parcel of real estate containing a residential dwelling from Barrett Builders, Inc., a corporation apparently owned or controlled

*123DEITS, J. Plaintiff Ketcham and intervenor appeal the trial court’s allowance of defendant Selles’ motion to offset judgments and motion to dismiss, its denial of intervenor’s motion to intervene and its denial of plaintiffs and intervenor’s motion to dismiss and requests for trial. We affirm. In Apr

Barney, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned. This litigation concerns a vacancy on the District Court bench. The plaintiffs, who are Addison County residents and long-time members of the Vermont bar, are potential candidates for that vacancy. Their complaint seeks to enjoin and set aside actions by the judicial branch that, if not enjoined, would have the effect of changing the va*315

783 F.Supp. 511 (1991) Evelyn G. KETCHAM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CV-N-91-47-ECR. United States District Court, D. Nevada. August 27, 1991. *512 Thomas A. Collins, Reno, Nev., for plaintiff. Leland E. Lutfy, U.S. Atty., Reno, Nev., Mark G. Fraase, Trial Atty., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice,

Carley, Judge. Appellants Bonnie and Edwin Ketcham were tried before a jury on an indictment which charged them jointly with the offense of theft by taking. The jury found appellants guilty. Appellants appeal from the judgments of conviction and sentences entered on the jury’s guilty verdicts. 1. The general grounds are raised in related enumerations of error. Appellants’ contention is that, rather than thei

BUTTLER, P. J. Defendant was cited to appear and show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt of court for wilful failure to pay spousal and child support previously ordered by the court. He appeals from the final order adjudging him to be in contempt and sentencing him to six months in jail, contending that the trial court erred in failing to inform him of his right to assistance of court appointed counsel.

748 P.2d 67 (1987) 304 Or. 529 Ronald M. KETCHAM, Respondent On Review, v. George W. SELLES and Elaine B. Selles, Husband and Wife, Petitioners On Review, Steve Carson and Joanne Carson, Husband and Wife, Respondents. TC 85-678-CV; CA A39458; SC S34058. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted November 5, 1987. Decided

735 P.2d 1246 (1987) 85 Or.App. 74 Ronald M. KETCHAM, Appellant, v. George W. SELLES and Elaine B. Selles, Husband and Wife, Steven Carson and Joanne Carson, Husband and Wife, Each As an Individual and As a Co-Partner Dba Keno Rock Products, Respondents. 85-678-CV; CA A39458. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted November 14, 1986.

146 Ill. App.3d 196 (1986) 496 N.E.2d 1104 HOWARD E. KETCHAM, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant (Republic Steel Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee). No. 85-1340. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed July 18, 1986.

343 Pa. Superior Ct. 534 (1985) 495 A.2d 594 In re ESTATE OF Ida Graham KETCHAM, Deceased. Appeal of Barbara Harrison JOHNSON. ESTATE OF Ida Graham KETCHAM, Deceased. Appeal of Eleanor Graham ROBB. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 26, 1985. Filed June 28, 1985. *535 A. Bruce Niccolo, Devon,

*1358ROONEY, Justice. On November 16,1978, appellant-defendant was sentenced to a term of not less than two nor more than five years in the Wyoming State Penitentiary after a plea of guilty to a charge of burglary in violation of § 6-7-201, W.S.1977. The execution of the sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation for a period of five years. On March

JUSTICE MURRAY delivered the opinion of the court: This is an appeal by defendant, third-party plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) from the trial court’s order dismissing its third-party amended complaint against third-party defendant, Republic Steel Corporation (Republic). On appeal, Conrail contends that: (1) the trial court erroneously dismissed its property

875 S.W.2d 753 (1994) Lorene KETCHAM, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEW BOSTON, TEXAS, Appellee. No. 06-93-00041-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted November 2, 1993. Decided May 2, 1994. *754 Kirk Johnson, Wyrick, Gooding & Johnson, Texarkana, for appellant. Charles G. Hall, Tex