Cases

Memorandum of Opinion and Order PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN, District Judge. Introduction This matter is before the Court upon defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Remaining Claims (Counts I, V, VI, VII, VIII, and X) in Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. 13) and defendants’ Motion to Strike Consent Agreement and Affidavits of Plaintiffs, Lydia Glaude, and June Romeo (D

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 06–1054 Filed November 21, 2008 GREGORY KERN, Appellant, vs. PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC, ROBERT PERCUOCO, GUY RIEKEMAN, and KEVIN MCCARTHY, Individually, Appellees. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, James E. Kelley, Judge. A discharged employee challenges summary judgment in favor of the employer on a wrongful termination claim and th

Matter of Naar v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 03683) Matter of Naar v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 03683 Decided on May 23, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Jerome Hampton appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol ("DUI"). We vacate the judgment of sentence, reverse the order denying suppression, and remand for further proceedings. The trial court set forth the factual and procedural background underlying the instant appeal as follows: Police Officer Ka

MAJORITY OPINION JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice. Appellant, Robin Singh Educational Services, Inc., appeals from the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellee, Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Appellant and appellee both offer test preparation courses for various standardized scholastic examinations

191 F.3d 588 (5th Cir. 1999) LEONARD G. GUZZINO, ET AL., Plaintiffsv.JODY M. FELTERMAN, ET AL., Defendants,DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Cross-Claimant/Appellant,v.PETER J. LIPARI; PATTERSON STATE BANK; WHITNEY HOLDING CORP., Third-Party Defendants/Appellees,andJODY M. FELTERMAN, Cross-Defendant/Appellee.GARY MASSICOT, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.JODY M. FELTERMAN, ET AL., Defendants

CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 In this case, we consider the operation of section 13-20-101, C.R.S. (2017), Colorado's survival statute, and section 10-3-1116(1), C.R.S. (2017), a statutory cause of action for the unreasonable delay or denial of insurance benefits. We also consider the scope of the trial court's authority to enter a final judgment n

52 So.3d 1095 (2010) Brian HESSER v. NABORS DRILLING USA, LP. No. 10-741. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 8, 2010. *1096 Kevin Andrew Marks, Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant/Appellee, Nabors Drilling USA, LP. Mark Kenneth Manno, Fischer & Associates, Sh

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 414 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-130 ELIZABETH GOODE Opinion Delivered September 10, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH V.

BEEZER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Robert, Molly, and Samantha Shad appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“DWR”) and two of its account executives. The Shads alleged that DWR account executives churned four Shad accounts between August 1978 and July 1982 in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exc

988 P.2d 930 (1999) 164 Or. App. 109 W. Dean FERNLEY, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, v. Rhonda LLOYD, Appellant—Cross-Respondent. (9303-01573; CA A94724) Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1999. Decided November 10, 1999. *931 Danny H. Gerlt, Portland, argued the cause a

[Cite as State v. Stacy, 2025-Ohio-4491.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Case No. 2024 CA 00204 Plaintiff - Appellee Opinion And Judgment Entry -vs- Appeal from the Stark County Court of

[Cite as State v. Wood, 2022-Ohio-3536.] COURT OF APPEALS PERRY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon. C

427 F.Supp.2d 105 (2006) Maureen RIEGER, Plaintiff, v. ORLOR, INC. dba Executive Honda, Executive Auto Group, Inc. and David Blackert, Defendants. No. 3:04CV244 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 29, 2006. *106 *107 *108

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND GRANTING TARSADIA DEFENDANTS’ AND PLAYGROUND’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE NEGLIGENCE CAUSE OF ACTION GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’1 motion for reconsideration of two rulings in the Court’s order filed on October 16, 2013. (Dkt. No. 133.) In th

HECHT, Justice. In this case, a discharged employee sued his former employer for breach of an employment contract, and sued three of the employer’s agents for tortious interference with that contract. The district court concluded the termination was, as a matter of law, for cause and granted summary judgment to all of the defendants. We conclude the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the employer and one of

GARRETT, J. |/The defendants, Milton Crow Limited Partnership and Livingstone, LLC (collectively, “C-L”), appeal from a trial court judgment granting the plaintiff, Phillips Energy Partners, LLC (“PEP”), a right of passage across their estates and denying the defendants’ motion for new trial. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court judgment and remand for further proceedings.

This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras

ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE PRATT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The parties in this case have submitted several in limine motions, with supporting *807memoranda and attachments, along with responses and statements in opposition, in anticipation of the non-jury trial in this matter. See Clerk’s Nos. 266-286. In the arg