⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kevin Duane Jackson”

Jackson v. Clarkepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-27 · Published · cited 0× · 351 F. App'x 172
MEMORANDUM ** Arthur Duane Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by denying him postconviction discovery of potentially exculpatory evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
Jackson v. Clarkepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-27 · Published · cited 1× · 351 F. App'x 172
MEMORANDUM ** Arthur Duane Jackson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by denying him postconviction discovery of potentially exculpatory evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-11-10 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 10, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00392-CR COURTNEY DUANE BARLOW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
12/21/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 26, 2017 Session MARLON DUANE KISER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 274423 Don W. Poole, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
./ I-;:. LJ 0 This document contains some pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging. RECEIVED IN 0 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 30 2Ui5 n THE STATE OF TEXAS
In re Duane F.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 309 A.D.2d 265; 764 N.Y.S.2d 434; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9912
OPINION OF THE COURT Marlow, J. This is a single eyewitness identification case. The complainant, also the eyewitness, did not testify at the Sirois,1 Wade or fact-finding hearings. The only evidence admitted at the fact-finding hearing about the identification procedure was the transcript of the prior hearsay testimony of a police officer, who had dete
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 20, 2003 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DUANE BRIAN BROOKS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S43,678 Phyllis H. Miller, Judge No. E2002-02040-CCA-R3-CD July 10, 2003 The defendant, Duane Brian Bro
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 07–0142 Filed July 10, 2009 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KEVIN DEMALE JOHNSON, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Michael S. Walsh (motion to dismiss) and Duane E. Hoffmeyer (trial), Judges. Defendant appeals convictions following a bench trial claiming he was tried in violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers and
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-04-11 · Published · cited 74× · 887 F.3d 1081
JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: *1083 Relator Billy Joe Hunt filed a qui tam action alleging that his employer The Parsons Corporation and another entity, Cochise Consultancy, Inc., violated the False Claims Act ("FCA"),
Jackson v. Bergepublic domain
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994-09-30 · Published · cited 3× · 864 F. Supp. 873; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14584; 1994 WL 557056
864 F.Supp. 873 (1994) Pearlie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. Warden BERGE, Captain Prieve, Major McClelland, Sergeant Goggins, Sergeant Martel, Sergeant Bensley, and Sergeant Cupery, Defendants. No. 92-C-817. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. September 30, 1994. *874 Pearlie B. Jackson, pro se. David E. Hoel, Asst.
Bowers v. Whitmanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-01-12 · Published · cited 34× · 671 F.3d 905
664 F.3d 1321 (2012) Jon BOWERS; Lynna Bowers; A.L. Bruner; Marilyn Bruner; Robert Ferns; Milton Gorden; Kathleen Gorden; Morton Gossett; Charles N. Hilkey, Jr.; Linda Jones; James Lavia; Marcia Lavia; Donald Litchfield; Melissa Litchfield; Jerry McCauley; Kathleen McCauley; Irma Payne; Harold Payne; Walter Phillips; Lyle Woodcock, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard WHITMAN; State of Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, Defendan
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 246 So. 3d 941
LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Pasquale Solitro was found guilty of driving under the influence (DUI), first offense, in the Jasper County Justice Court. He appealed his conviction to the Jasper County Circuit Court for a trial de novo. Following a bench trial in the circuit court, Solitro was convicted of common law DUI first offense and was sentenced to two days in jail; fined $1,000;
District Court, D. Hawaii · 1992-06-11 · Published · cited 15× · 795 F. Supp. 1036; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8890; 1992 WL 128422
795 F.Supp. 1036 (1992) Cynthia GENOVIA, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, and the Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of Lincoln, Nebraska, a Nebraska corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 91-00288. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. June 11, 1992. *1037 Clyde Wm. Matsui, Randall
State v. Goodleypublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002-12-11 · Published · cited 5× · 832 So. 2d 1165; 2000 La.App. 3 Cir. 0846; 2002 La. App. LEXIS 3787; 2002 WL 31760075
PICKETT, Judge. FACTS The defendant, Kevin Duane Goodley, was indicted for second degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1. Following a trial before a jury on January 10-11, 2000, he was found guilty as charged. On April 20, 2000, the district court sentenced him to the mandatory term of life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-09-19 · Published · cited 9× · 209 F. Supp. 3d 243; 118 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5835; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126906; 2016 WL 5107002
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On May 5, 2015, defendant Kevin Duane Bertram was sentenced to thirty months’ incarceration after he pleaded guilty to willfully failing to pay the federal income taxes that he withheld from his employees’ paychecks. See J. in a Criminal Case [Dkt. # 18] (“J & C”)
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022-01-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District GARY AUSTIN, ) ) Appellant, ) WD84085 ) v. ) OPINION FILED: January 2
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015-07-31 · Published · cited 4× · 356 P.3d 62; 2015 OK CIV APP 68; 2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 63; 2015 WL 5104615
BRIAN JACK GOREE, Presiding Judge. [ 1 The issue in this appeal is whether the Drug Dealer Liability Act, 68 0.8. 2011 $ 2-421 et seq., is unconstitutional. The Act permits a plaintiff who is harmed by the use of an illegal drug to recover civil damages against a defendant who has participated in the fllegal drug market. The Drug Dealer Liability Act is a new and non-traditional basis for civil Hability because it allows damag
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-15-00866-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/10/2015 3:56:43 PM
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2024-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District IN THE INTEREST OF: E.R., ) ) Respondent, ) WD86297 ) CHILDREN'S DIVISION, ) OPINION FILED: ) FEBRUARY 13, 2024