Cases

897 A.2d 1094 (2006) 385 N.J. Super. 501 Gerald G. HAGGERTY and Mary Jane Haggerty, Kathy Lou Colmorgen, Kaye Ernst, Jeffrey M. Weiner, Rudy Vener and Gina Vener, and David Prown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RED BANK BOROUGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent, and Building & Land Technology, a/k/a Building & Land Technology Inc., Defendant, and Palatial Homes at Red Bank, L.L.C., Defendant/Inter

*434OPINION OF THE COURT Levine, J. Kevin King died October 23, 1994 during what eyewitnesses described as a mob attack outside a pizzeria in the City of Olean, Cattaraugus County. The matter was submitted to a Grand Jury by the Cattaraugus County District Attorney. Some four months after the occurrence, the Grand Jury returned a no true bill. The Gra

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEISSBARD, J.A.D. Plaintiffs, landowners in the Borough of Red Bank (Borough), appeal from the dismissal of their complaint in lieu of prerogative writs challenging decisions of defendant, Red Bank Borough Zon*504ing Board of Adjustment (Board), granting the bifurcated application of Building and Land Techn

TERESHKO, J., Plaintiffs appeal from this court’s order of December 3,2009, bifurcating the five (5) remaining cases of an action that originally involved more than forty (40) plaintiffs. This court ordered the five cases to be tried initially on liability, then separately on the damage claims of individual plaintiffs. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs commenced this action following a motor v

3 Cal.Rptr.3d 835 (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 515 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Kevin Charles GILBEAUX, Defendant and Appellant. No. B157983. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five. August 20, 2003. Review Denied November 12, 2003. *836 Edward J. Haggerty, under appointment

ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2009, this Court having assumed plenary jurisdiction over this case by order dated April 7, 2009; and having specially appointed the Honorable William H. Piatt, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, to preside over a remand of this matter; and the Court having received and considered the Report and Recommendation of President Judge Piatt, as well

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge This case was transferred in February 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2144 YASMIN REYAZUDDIN, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant – Appellee. ------------------------------ THE disABILITY LAW CENTER OF VIRGINIA; DISABILITY RIGHTS MARYLAND; DISABILITY RIG

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2144 YASMIN REYAZUDDIN, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant – Appellee. ------------------------------ THE disABILITY LAW CENTER OF VIRGINIA; DISABILITY RIGHTS MARYLAND; DISABILITY RIG

1. The provisions of G. L. c. 277, § 72A, were not invoked by the demand for speedy trial which was filed in a District Court on April 1, 1976, because the defendant was not at that time a "prisoner serving a sentence of imprisonment.” Commonwealth v. Dabrieo, 370 Mass. 728, 739-741 (1976). Commonwealth v. Jones, 6 Mass. App. Ct. 750, 752 (1978). 2. No affidavit, evidence, or argument pertinent to the issue of prejudicial

Leibensperger, Edward P., J. I. Introduction In 1985, when a plan for the development of approximately 85 acres of land in the town of Tyngsborough (the “Town”) was approved by issuance of a special permit, a condition was imposed by the planning board of the Town with respect to the approval. The condition was that “no future development shall be allowed on this PUD site which will increase the density o

OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Thomas A. Joseph (Joseph, Sr.), Thomas J. Joseph (Joseph, Jr.), Acumark, Inc. (Acumark), and Airport Limousine and Taxi Service, Inc. (Airport Limousine) (Appellants, collectively) appeal from the April 23, 20121 judgment entered upon a non-jury verdict against Appellants and in favor of The Scranton Times, L.P. (Scranton Times), The Times Partner, James Conmy (Conmy),

Cardona, P.J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lebous, J.), entered July 9, 2003 in Broome County, which partially granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. *785Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for back and neck injuries she allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident with defendant’s vehicle. Foll

806 F.2d 1147 42 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 908,42 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,718, 6 Fed.R.Serv.3d 930 The HISPANIC SOCIETY OF the NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENTINC., Luis A. Salgado, William Morales, Manuel Torres,Valentin Neves, Jr., Individually and on behalf of all thosesimilarly situated, the Guardians Association of the PoliceDepartment of the City of New York Inc., Gregory S.Williams, Robert McNair,

OPINION Justice STEVENS. This discretionary appeal concerns a defamation case wherein The Scranton Times L.P., The Times Partner, James *41Conmy, and Edward Lewis (collectively “the Media Defendants”) 1 appeal from an order of the Superior Court, which affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the Hon

Hanlon, J. Along with her husband, the defendant was convicted of sexual abuse of her four minor sons and related drug offenses after a joint jury-waived trial in 1997.1 In 2002, she filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that battered woman syndrome had rendered her incompetent to stand trial, and thus *571she suffered a violation of her con

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1776 KEVIN CARROZZA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. d/b/a CVS PHARMACY, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. F. Dennis Saylor, IV, U.S. Dist

*717LAVERY and DRANGINIS, Js., dissenting from the order. We dissent from the order of the court dismissing the motions to stay the execution. We agree with the majority that the plaintiffs in error, the office of the chief public defender and Dan Ross, Michael Ross’ father, lack standing to raise claims on behalf of the defen

57 N.Y.2d 27 (1982) Board of Education, Levittown Union Free School District et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Board of Education, City School District, Rochester et al., Intervenors-Respondents-Appellants, v. Ewald B. Nyquist, as Commissioner of Education, et al., Appellants-Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued May 10, 1982. Decided June 23, 1982.</

OPINION OF THE COURT Wallach, J. On March 7, 1995, the Governor approved the first legislative enactment of his term in office, designated as chapter 1 of the Laws of 1995. Included in this legislation, most of which was to become effective the following September 1st, was a return to the death penalty as a permissible sentence (Penal Law § 60.06), for an expanded list of crimes characterized as murder in