Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kevin Harris”
State of Tennessee v. Kevin Harrispublic domain
02/14/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 22, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN HARRIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cheatham County No. 19186 Larry J. Wallace, Judge ___________________________________
Kevin Harris v. James F. Jayopublic domain
USCA11 Case: 19-11286 Date Filed: 07/14/2021 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11286 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:18-cv-61788-WPD, Bkcy No. 0:17-
United States v. Kevin Harrispublic domain
*1055 OPINION PER CURIAM: In 1997, Michael Harris was convicted of eight federal criminal counts related to theft from an employee benefit plan. He was sentenced to 30 months in prison and ordered to pay $646,000 in restitution. He has paid only a small fraction of that amount.
Kevin Harris v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Mar 19 2019, 9:04 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicata, collateral
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ March 31, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A15A1132. KEVIN HARRIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, EX. REL, KASAI DANE HARRIS. The Georgia Department of Human Services brought an action against Kevin Harris, seeking to collect past-due child support. The superior court entered a contempt o
United States v. Kevin Harrispublic domain
No. 95-2047 United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Kevin Guy Harris, * * Appellant. *
Ricky Harris v. Kevin Hampton, Wardenpublic domain
04/22/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE RICKY HARRIS v. KEVIN HAMPTON, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bledsoe County No. 2019-CR-1 Justin C. Angel, Judge ___________________________________ No. E2019-00571-CCA-R3-HC
Kevin Gills v. Mary Harrispublic domain
Opinion filed February 2, 2017 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-15-00018-CV __________ KEVIN GILLS, Appellant V. MARY HARRIS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 2
Harris v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed. Remanded.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-1825 Filed August 16, 2017 KEVIN ROWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TOM HARRIS and TOM HARRIS d/b/a TOM HARRIS AUCTION CENTER, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Michael J. Moon, Judge. A defendant appeals following the district cour
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 5, 2024 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00250-CV KEVIN M. BENNETT AND CARMEN DIANDRA VAUGHNISHA HARRIS, Appellants V. ISBELL RENTALS/PROPERTIES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Bell County, Texa
United States v. Harrispublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER After a jury trial, Defendant-Appellant Kevin Harris appeals from his convictions for conspiracy to distribute heroin and 28 grams or more of a mixture containing cocaine base, distributing heroin and cocaine base, and possessing, with intent to distribute, heroin and cocaine base. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of this case. Harris, proceeding through counsel, raises two issues on appeal, and he raises
United States v. Harrispublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit January 4, 2017 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-IA-00354-SCT ALPHA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. BETTY HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BETTY HARRIS ON BEHALF OF ALL THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF JOHN HARRIS, DECEASED, AND KEVIN GOODEN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/29/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ADRIENNE ANNETT HOOPER- WOOTEN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JOE N. TATUM SAMUEL JOHN NICHOLAS, JR.
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Harris, R.public domain
[J-40-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 31 EAP 2022 : Appellant : Appeal from the Judgment of : Superior Court entered on J
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Harris, R.public domain
[J-40-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 31 EAP 2022 : Appellant : Appeal from the Judgment of : Superior Court entered on J
Harris v. Harrispublic domain
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Thomas, J.), dated March 13, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court dated December 9, 2011, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded custody of the parties’ children to the father. Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as
Harris v. Harrispublic domain
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Thomas, J.), dated March 13, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court dated December 9, 2011, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded custody of the parties’ children to the father. Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as
Kevin Wayne Harris v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued October 7, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Harris v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 493.