Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
18 opinions for “Kevin Mills v. Stitch Industries, Inc.”
Stitch-Tec Co. v. Royal Banks of Missouripublic domain
JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Royal Banks of Missouri, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Washington County denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, Stitch-Tec Company, Inc., for lack of jurisdiction. The issues raised on appeal are (1) whether defendan
In Re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § No. 181, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 12711
In re Tesla Motors, Inc. Stockholder Litigationpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. ) CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION ) C.A. No. 12711-VCS MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: January 18, 2022 Date Decided: April 27, 2022 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esquire, Christine M. Mackintosh, Esquire, Kelly L. Tucker, Esquire and Vivek Upadhya, Esquire of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Wilming
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE COLUMBIA PIPELINE GROUP, INC. ) Cons. C.A. No. 2018-0484-JTL MERGER LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: December 4, 2020 Date Decided: March 1, 2021 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Gregory V. Varallo, BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, Wilmington,
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.public domain
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
DSM Holdco, Inc. v. Demoulaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DSM HOLDCO, INC.; DEMOULAS ) SUPER MARKETS, INC.; and JAY K. ) HACHIGIAN, STEVEN J. COLLINS, and ) MICHAEL KEYES, in their capacities as ) Directors of the Board of DSM HoldCo, ) Inc. and the Board of Demoulas Super ) Markets, Inc., ) ) Plaintiffs / Counterclaim ) Defendants,
RM Engineered Products, Inc. v. UOP, Inc.public domain
793 F.Supp. 1373 (1991) RM ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC. v. UOP, INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 88-2496. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division. November 26, 1991. *1374 *1375 Marvin I. Oberman and Harold Oberman, Oberman & Oberman, A. Arthur Rosenblum, Charleston, S.C., J
Gund, Inc. v. Russ Berrie and Co., Inc.public domain
701 F.Supp. 1013 (1988) GUND, INC., Plaintiff, v. RUSS BERRIE AND CO., INC., Defendant. No. 88 Civ. 2929 (VLB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 12, 1988. *1014 George Gottlieb, Jane Shay Wald, Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, New York City, for plaintiff Gund, Inc. Philip H. Gottfried, Eugene Berman,
White v. Weyerhaeuser Co.public domain
*********** Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission MODIFIES and AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters
White v. Weyerhaeuser Co.public domain
606 S.E.2d 389 (2005) James W. WHITE, Employee, Plaintiff, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Employer, Self-Insured, Defendant. No. COA03-1337. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. January 4, 2005. Kellum Law Firm, by J. Kevin Jones, New Bern, for plaintiff-appellee. Ward and Smith, P.A., by S. McKinley Gray, III and James R. Cummings, New Bern, for defendant-appellant
National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Voughtpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 16, 2025 Decided August 15, 2025 No. 25-5091 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, ET AL., APPELLEES v. RUSSELL T. VOUGHT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU AND CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, APPELLANTS Appeal from
Venezuela US SRL v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuelapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 23, 2026 Decided June 12, 2026 No. 25-7096 VENEZUELA US SRL, APPELLEE v. BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:22-cv-038
Brown v. Coughlinpublic domain
758 F.Supp. 876 (1991) James BROWN, Plaintiff, v. Thomas COUGHLIN, III, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services; Stephen Dalsheim, Superintendent of the Downstate Correctional Facility; Dr. Anthony Forte, Senior Doctor at Downstate Correctional Facility; Lillian Carpenter, Nurse Administrator at Downstate Correctional Facility; Gregory Mitchell, Counselor at Downstate Correctional Facility; Jacqueline McMickens, Com
Heidi Ott A.G. v. Target Corp.public domain
153 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2001) Heidi OTT A.G. and Heidi Ott, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION; the Brass Key, Inc.; Unimax Toys Limited; Unimax Toys (USA), Inc.; and John Pellegrene; Defendants. No. CIV 99-1170 (PAMJGL). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. March 8, 2001. *1056 *1057
State v. Robinsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 90,196 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee/Cross-appellant, v. JOHN E. ROBINSON, SR., Appellant/Cross-appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A constitution-based clai
Jack v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.public domain
SAMUEL, Judge. These cases (consolidated in the trial court and here) arise from a railroad crossing collision between an automobile and a train. Both plaintiffs filed suit against the Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company and the crew of the train involved in the collision for injuries and damages sustained by them. In addition, plaintiff Wallace Jack, a passenger in the automobile, sued the other plaintiff, the driver of
McConnell v. Federal Election Commissionpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu
ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36