Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kevin Patrick McGrath”
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Garberpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brings this action *464against, among others, Danny Garber, Kenneth Yellin, and Jordan Feinstein (the “individual defendants”) and certain entities that they control, specifically the OGP Group LLC, Rio Sterling Ho
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rajaratnampublic domain
*433 OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the motion of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for summary judgment against one of the few remaining defendants in the above-captioned insider trading case, Raj Rajaratnam.1 The SEC alleges that the defendant engaged
Smith v. Securities & Exchange Commissionpublic domain
653 F.3d 121 (2011) Lynn A. SMITH, Relief-Defendant-Appellant, Geoffrey R. SMITH, Lauren T. Smith, Defendant-Appellants, v. SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation, First Advisory Income Notes, LLC, First Excelsior Income Notes, LLC, First Independent Income Notes, LLC, Third Albany Income Notes, LLC, Timothy
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Guptapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On February 24, 2012, the parties in this insider trading civil enforcement action deposed Lloyd Blankfein, Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs, a non-party to this proceeding. During that deposition, counsel for defendant Gupta asked Blankfein if he had met with anyone other than his attorneys in connection with preparing for the deposition.
Montoya v. A-1 MUFFLERS, INC.public domain
323 S.W.3d 835 (2010) Nicholas MONTOYA, Respondent, v. A-1 MUFFLERS, INC., Appellant. No. WD 71773. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 2, 2010. Patrick McGrath, Kevin Weakley, Aaron Schwartz, Overland Park, KS, for Appellant. Patrick Reavey, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent. Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and GARY D.
Rossum v. Patrickpublic domain
622 F.3d 1262 (2010) Kristin ROSSUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deborah PATRICK, Warden, & Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.[*] No. 09-55666. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 2010. Filed September 23, 2010. *1
Rossum v. Patrickpublic domain
OPINION GERTNER, District Judge: State prisoner Kristin Rossum appeals the district court’s denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We reverse and remand for the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing on Rossum’s claim that she was deprived of her Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. Rossum was convicted of murdering her husband, Gregory de V
Montoya v. A-1 MUFFLERS, INC.public domain
331 S.W.3d 702 (2011) Nicholas MONTOYA, Respondent, v. A-1 MUFFLERS, INC., Appellant. No. WD 72276. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. February 22, 2011. *703 Patrick E. McGrath, Kevin Weakley, Aaron E. Schwartz, Overland Park, KS, for appellant. Patrick G. Reavey, Kansas City, MO, for respondent. Before C
People v. Williamsonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Patrick J.. McGrath, J. *173The above-named defendant was arraigned on April 4, 1997, on the charges of murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts) and endangering the welfare of a child, in violation of sections 125.27 (1) (a) (ix) and (1) (b), 125.25 (1), 120.05 (1), 120.0
Jeun v. United Statespublic domain
Veteran Disability Benefits; Physical Disability Board of Review; Veterans Affairs Disability Rating; Statute of Limitations OPINION MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge FINDINGS OF FACT Plaintiff Kevin J. Jeun (formerly Chihwan or Chi Jeun) filed a complaint in this court alleging an unlawful denial of military disabili
Conyers v. City of Chicagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiffs Blake Conyers, Lamar Ewing, and Kevin Flint, individually and on behalf of a class, bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago (the “City”). The plaintiffs allege that the City’s policies pertaining to the destruction of personal property items seized from arres-tees at the City’s police station viol
State v. DeWittpublic domain
149 P.3d 549 (2006) 2006 MT 302 334 Mont. 474 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Patrick B. DeWITT, Defendant and Appellant. No. DA 06-0103. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs November 1, 2006. Decided November 22, 2006. For Appellant: Kevin E. Vainio, Attorney at Law, Butte, Mon
MEMORANDUM JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. On December 17, 2010, the SEC renewed its motion to compel defendants Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi to produce to the SEC all relevant wiretapped communications in their possession. On January 5, 2011, defendants filed opposition papers in which they agreed to produce certain of the wiretapped communications and objected to producing others. The SE
WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must decide whether the district court should have granted a new trial based on an allegedly inconsistent and inadequate jury verdict in a personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident. The jury initially awarded the plaintiff passenger nearly $17,000 in past medical expenses, but zero for pain and suffering. All parties agreed that the verdict was inconsistent, and the ju
Joseph Patrick Doherty v. U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Servicepublic domain
908 F.2d 1108 Joseph Patrick DOHERTY, Petitioner,v.U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATIONSERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 662, 880, Dockets 88-4084, 89-4092. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Jan. 19, 1990.Decided June 29, 1990. Mary Boresz Pike, New York City (Somerste
Worcester Insurance v. Bettenhauserpublic domain
95 N.Y.2d 185 (2000) 734 N.E.2d 745 712 N.Y.S.2d 433 In the Matter of WORCESTER INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. THOMAS BETTENHAUSER, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued May 10, 2000. Decided June 20, 2000. *186 Russo, Fox & Karl, Hauppauge (K
Gray v. CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANApublic domain
693 F.Supp.2d 823 (2010) Derrick GRAY, Yolanda Gray, Amir Gray, a minor, Derrick Gray, a minor, and Atia Gray, a minor, by their next friend, Yolanda Gray, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, Sgt. Patrick Vicari, Cpl. Karl Eidam, City of Calumet City, and Sgt. Kevin Urbanek, Defendants. Cause No.: 2:08-CV-114-TS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana. March 4, 2010.</
In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McGRATHpublic domain
462 N.W.2d 599 (1990) In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST F. Patrick McGRATH, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota. No. C4-90-178. Supreme Court of Minnesota. November 16, 1990. *600 William J. Wernz, Director, Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, St. Paul, for appellant. John J. Scanlon, Hinckley, for
Amended February 23, 2016 Kevin Bryant v. Robert Lee Rimrodt and Geico General Insurance Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1883 Filed December 11, 2015 Amended February 23, 2016 KEVIN BRYANT, Appellant, vs. ROBERT LEE RIMRODT and GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and LORI LYNN PARR, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Ian K. Thornhill, Judge. Plaintiff seeks a ne
Chesapeake Operating Inc., Nomac Drilling Corporation, Robert Russell/Robert M. Consulting, LLC v. Kevin Paul Hopelpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-11-00403-CV ________________________ CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC., NOMAC DRILLING CORPORATION, ROBERT RUSSELL/ROBERT M. CONSULTING, LLC, APPELLANTS V. KE