Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED June 22, 2022 Session Nov 22 2029 RANDOLYN LAFERNEY v. KIM LIVESAY ET AU. Rec'd by. Robot ne fours 0 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County No. 39969 James E. Lauderback, Judge No. E2021-00812-COA-R3-CV Plaintiff Randolyn Laferney filed a tort action against several defendants, alleging causes of action for, inter alia, libel, civil conspiracy, and malicious prosecution. The allegations arose primarily out

Claim Construction Opinion & Order SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. Table of Contents I. General Legal Standard...................................................425 II. The Abuse-Proof Patents.................................................425 *424A. Background........................

MEMORANDUM *** John Bach, a former practicing lawyer, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-64, California statutory law, and Idaho statutory and common law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgme

ACCEPTED 05-14-01495-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/27/2015 12:00:00 AM

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th