Cases

Manion, Circuit Judge. Hyung Seok and Eunsook Koh, husband and wife, brought a § 1983 suit arising out of the investigation of and the Kohs' arrests in connection with their son's death. They sued the Northbrook Police Department, various Northbrook officers, the Wheeling Police Department, and a Wheeling officer asserting state and federal claims. The district court granted in part a

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 18-1809 & 18-1821 HYUNG SEOK KOH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOHN USTICH, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIM NGO, No. 20-56027 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-06197- MWF-GJS BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC; BMW AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; DOES, 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,

606 So.2d 940 (1992) Hilton ROY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dr. A. GUPTA, et al., The Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-246. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. October 6, 1992. Writ Denied December 11, 1992. *941 John T. Bennett, Marksville, Edward A. Kaplan, A

OPINION AND JUDGMENT Raucci, J. The 251 captioned, vendor-payment actions are before the Court on Respondent’s motions for summary judgment as to each of them, pursuant to section 2 — 1005 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1005), and for dismissal of 235 of said actions pursuant to section 2 — 619, Id., section 790.90 of th

02-10-349-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00349-CV WOUNDKAIR CONCEPTS, INC., APPELLANTS DAN ANDERSON, AND KIM ANDERSON V. RICHARD F. WALSH, MEDICA- APPELLEES RENTS CO., LTD., AND MED-RCO, INC. ----------

PER CURIAM: Defendants-appellants appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court of the District of Connecticut (Vanessa L. Bryant, Judge) awarding $32,489.29 in attorney’s fees and costs to plaintiff-appellee. The issue presented by this case is whether a defendant remains liable for plaintiffs attorney’s fees accrued after defendant offered a settlement that included the maximum available damages and,

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellants District of Columbia and the District’s Police Chief appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction restraining enforcement of a “good reason” standard in the D.C.Code provision governing the issuance of licenses for the carrying of concealed weapons.

804 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2011) MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. 10-24063-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. August 17, 2011. *1273 Amanda Wieker, Kevin J. Post, Megan F. Raymond, Priti Langer, R. Andrew Schwentker, Ropes & Gray, LLP, Washington, DC, Br

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 20, 2016 Decided July 25, 2017 No. 16-7025 BRIAN WRENN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:1

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JAMES WARE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring this putative class action alleging, inter alia, that Defendants engaged in a pattern of behavior in implementing the District Attorney Bad Check Diversion Program1 (“Diversion Program”) that violates

Paulino v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp. (2025 NY Slip Op 00232) Paulino v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp. 2025 NY Slip Op 00232 Decided on January 15, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J

15 A.3d 219 (2011) Alan GRAYSON, Appellant, v. AT & T CORPORATION, et al., Appellees. Paul M. Breakman, Appellant, v. AOL LLC, Appellee. Nos. 07-CV-1264, 08-CV-1089. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued en banc June 22, 2010. Decided January 20, 2011. *222 Victor Kubli, Vienna, VA, and Wa

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0102p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JAMIE GAVIN; JHAMYA WINTERS; TIFFANIE WOLF; │ MELISSA SPEAKER; JAMIE

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDREW KING, on behalf of No. 24-1838 himself and all others similarly D.C. No. situated, 2:23-cv-05915- SPG-AGR Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OPINI

23-222 Michel v. Yale University In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: April 5, 2024 Decided: August 7, 2024) Docket No. 23-222 JONATHAN MICHEL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, *

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge: *947 Much has been said about the art of diagnosis. For example, Mahatma Gandhi 2 opined, "A correct diagnosis is three-fourths the remedy." Prashant Gupta, Wisdom of Gandhi 53 (2008).

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1239 STEVEN KAILIN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF GURNEE and DELANTE GREER, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25 - 701 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jane Doe is a pro s