Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 997 CA 13-01392 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. DEVON FAISON AND TIERRA FAISON, AN INFANT, BY HER PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, KIMBERLY BARNETT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE LUONG, DEFENDANT, JAMES L. CUYLER AND GEORGIA CUYLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.) BURGIO, KITA, CUR

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 998 CA 13-01394 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. DEVON FAISON AND TIERRA FAISON, AN INFANT, BY HER PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, KIMBERLY BARNETT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE LUONG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, JAMES L. CUYLER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.) ATHARI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 996 CA 13-01391 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. DEVON FAISON AND TIERRA FAISON, AN INFANT, BY HER PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, KIMBERLY BARNETT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE LUONG, JAMES L. CUYLER AND GEORGIA CUYLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) ATHARI & A

243 P.3d 118 (2010) 238 Or. App. 577 Kimberly BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SALEM, a public body; Robert Wells; and Constance Munnell, aka Constance Wiggins, Defendants-Respondents, and Craig Stoelk, Defendant. 05C14514; A139407. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2010. Decided November 10, 2010.</

ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge. After being fired from his job at Sheila J. Butler and Company, Inc. (“the employer”), Danny Barnett applied for unemployment compensation benefits under Georgia’s Employment Security Law, OCGA § 34-8-1 et seq. The employer challenged Barnett’s application for unemployment benefits, contending that he was fired for violating orders, rules, or instructions, or for failing to perform duties of his e

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Jonathan Barnett alleges that his former employer, DynCorp International LLC, failed to give him all of the pay and benefits he was owed for work he did in Kuwait. To resolve this appeal, we must decide whether the district court properly dismissed Barnett’s putative class action complaint on the basis of a forum-selection clause in h

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 89-2-00112-0, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered May 22, 1997. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.

959 P.2d 691 (1998) 91 Wash.App. 671 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Clifford BARNETT, Appellant. No. 38611-5-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. July 20, 1998. *692 Kimberly Noel Gordon, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Appellant. Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish County D

73 Wn. App. 825 (1994) 871 P.2d 627 ROBERT L. GUNTLE, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY A. BARNETT, ET AL, Respondents. No. 14880-3-II. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two. April 21, 1994. *827 Jon C. Parker and Parker, Johnson, Edwards & Parker, for appellant. Kimberly A. Bar

MEMORANDUM OPINION DOUGLAS D. DODD, Bankruptcy Judge. Whitney National Bank (“Whitney”) moved for approval of post-petition attorneys’ fees and costs1 of $352,888.002 and $112,639.52, respectively. Debtor Barnett Marine objected3 on the following grounds: (1) the inapplicability of 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) to post-confirmatio

JUDGE EMANUELLA GROVES Facts On June 13, 2017, Mr. Beonte Walker ("Defendant") was cited for fare evasion on the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority ("RTA") Red Line rapid/transit train ("Red Line") in violation of C.C.O. § 605.11 Misconduct Involving a Public Transportation System ("fare evasion"), which states in pertinent part, "No person shall evade the payment of the known fares of a pu

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 89-2-00112-0, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered November 4, 1994. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewa-ter and Armstrong, JJ.

968 F.Supp. 690 (1997) Derrick BARNETT, as Natural Parent and Guardian of Derrian J. Barnett, Plaintiff, v. LEISERV, INC., d/b/a Circus World Pizza, Defendant, v. ROYAL CUP, INC., and Frankie Roberts, Third-Party Plaintiff. Civil Action No. 1:95-CV-2588-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 31, 1997.

527 F.Supp.2d 430 (2007) KIMBERLY-CLARK PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. DELAWARE COUNTY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL AUTHORITY, a Pennsylvania Municipal Authority. Civil Action No. 07-2688. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 20, 2007. *431 Bonnie Allyn Barnett, Sarah S. McInnes,

1 F.Supp.2d 572 (1998) J. Bruce BARNETT, Plaintiff, v. TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 3:97CV771. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 8, 1998. *573 David R. Simonsen, Jr., Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff. David E. Constine, Kimberly W. Daniel, D. Eugene Webb, Mays & V

Appeal and cross appeals from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered May 9, 2013. The judgment and order denied the motion and cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion and dismissing the complaint against defendant Lee Luong and by granting the cr

Mihalatos v Barnett (2019 NY Slip Op 06082) Mihalatos v Barnett 2019 NY Slip Op 06082 Decided on August 7, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered June 7, 2013. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant Lee Luong for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in Faison v Luong ([appea

Appeal and cross appeals from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered May 9, 2013. The judgment and order denied the motion and cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion and dismissing the complaint against defendant Lee Luong and by granting the cr

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered June 7, 2013. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant Lee Luong for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment. It is hereby ordered that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs. Same memorandum as in Faison v Luong ([appea