Cases

Cassel, J. INTRODUCTION Nearly 20 years after a jury convicted James E. Myers of murder, he filed a motion for testing under the DNA Testing **757 Act. 1 The district court denied that motion as well as Mye

OPINION BY OTT, J.: Myers Coach Lines, Inc. and A.J. Myers & Sons, Inc. (collectively, "Myers Coach"), *428 appeal from the judgment of $2,400.00, entered on November 17, 2017, in the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of Kimberly M. Greco, in this action for wrongfu

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT EDWARD ELLINGTON, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER came before the Court on November 29-30, 2011, for trial on the following pleadings filed in the above-styled adversary proceeding: 1. Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (# 1) filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee, Kimberly R. Lentz; 2. Joint Answ

PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Concurrence by Judge Berzon ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion and concurrence filed October 20, 2017, and appearing at 873 F.3d 1103, is hereby amended. An amended opinion and concurrence is filed herewi

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Edward Ellington, Judge FORWARD The matter before the Court involves two different cases which were filed by the same debtor. The first case was filed in 2000, and is still open. The second case was filed fourteen (14) years later in 2014. On August 17, 2000, case number 00-53489EE was filed by Rick Myers and Tina Myers

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Loushonda Myers appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment and denying reconsideration of its orders and the magistrate judge’s orders in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distric

382 B.R. 304 (2008) In re Rick MYERS and Tina Myers. No. 00-53489EE. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi. January 31, 2008. *305 *306 Robert Gambrell, Biloxi, MS, Derek A. Henderson, Jackson, MS, for Debtors. Kimberly R. Lentz, Gulfport, MS, William J. Little, Jr., Jackson, MS, for

425 B.R. 296 (2010) In re Rick MYERS, Tina Myers d/b/a P & L Properties d/b/a Express Personnel. No. 0053489EE. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi. March 9, 2010. *297 Derek A. Henderson, Jackson, MS, Michael T. Jaques, Ridgeland, MS, Attorneys for Debtors. *298 Kimberly R. Le

154 P.3d 714 (2007) 2007 OK CR 8 Carl Don MYERS, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. M-2006-42. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 8, 2007. Ricki J. Walterscheid, Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Norman, OK, for appellant at trial and appeal. Kimberly Heinze, Katrina Conrad-Legler, Oklahoma Indigent Defense System,

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order dismissing claims against some defendants without prejudice and granting Appellant Loushonda Myers leave to amend the complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),

*262Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court clerk’s order denying their motion for electronic delivery of papers. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and cert

ORDER Anthony L. Harris, a pro se Tennessee prisoner, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Seeking monetary, declaratory, and injun

MOORE, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in all aspects of the main opinion except that portion that reverses the trial court's judgment to the extent that it ordered Carl David Myers ("the husband") to pay the private-school tuition of his minor child. As I wrote in J.D.A. v. A.B.A.,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SEAN GOODMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

22-1000 In re: Kimberly Bruce UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2022 (Argued: April 18, 2023 | Decided: August 2, 2023) Docket No. 22-1000 KIMBERLY BRUCE, Debtor and Plaintiff on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, AKA Kimberly A. Bruce, AKA Kimberly Ant

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 25, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KIMBERLY M. SMART Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 313010 Boyd M. Patterson, Judge FILED No. E2023-01688-CCA-R3-CD The Defendant, Kimberly M. Smart, was convicted by a Hamilton County jury of reckless aggravated assault, for which she received a sentence of three years’ incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant argues that (1) the trial court erred in admitting extr

[Cite as State v. Myers, 2022-Ohio-991.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 21AP0027 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JACOB MYERS

PER CURIAM. Kimberly Roden appeals the trial court’s order granting the tobacco companies’ motion to dismiss. Roden argues that the trial court erred in determining that the complaint could not be amended to add a wrongful death claim. We agree. In January 2008, the original plaintiff, Loretta Roden (“Loretta”), filed a complaint against the 'tobacco com

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs received medical services but did not pay their bills. Their providers referred the debts to defendants, and dunning letters ensued. The debt collectors demanded payment not only of the principal sums but also of 5% per annum interest. Plaintiffs contend that this violates 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)(l), part of the Fair Debt Collection Practices