⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Kimberly Renae Smith”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2007-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 368 B.R. 381; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1621; 2007 WL 1404441
368 B.R. 381 (2007) In re CORAM HEALTHCARE CORP. and Coram, Inc., Debtors. No. 00-3299 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. May 10, 2007. Deborah E. Spivack, Richards, Layton & Finger, Etta Rena Wolfe, Smith Katzenstein & Furlow LLP, Kenneth E. Aaron, Weir & Partners LLP, Laura Davis Jones, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl Young, Jones & W, Rachel Lowy
Black v. Simmspublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-06-10 · Published · cited 16× · 12 So. 3d 1140; 2009 WL 1607918
12 So.3d 1140 (2009) Kimberlee Coraine BLACK v. Kimberly Renae SIMMS. No. CA 08-1465. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. June 10, 2009. Joseph L. McReynolds, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant Kimberlee Corianne Black. *1141 Walter Marshall, Sanchez Sanchez Law Firm, Lake Cha
In Re Duvallpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 281 B.R. 646; 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 864; 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5938; 2002 WL 1868739
281 B.R. 646 (2002) In re Douglas D. DUVALL, Linda G. Duvall, Linda Flanery, Patrick Dale James, Danielle Darleen James, Richard Yeaman Justice, Deborah Renae Justice, Gary Wayne Rainey, Tasha Michelle Rainey, Mary Ann Smith, Valerie Brooks, Kimberly Joy Moorman, Penny E. Morgan, Micole R. Shabazz, Jenny Allen, Debtors. Nos. 02-40234, 02-40053, 02-30510, 02-40086, 02-40055, 02-30850, 02-40178, 01-37622, 02-30511, 01-35535, 02-30126.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 1995-10-25 · Published · cited 5× · 34 Fed. Cl. 313; 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,854; 1995 U.S. Claims LEXIS 203; 1995 WL 626544
OPINION HARKINS, Senior Judge: Procedural History Jurisdiction of this contract case is under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. § 609 (1988) and the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a). The initial complaint was filed November 9, 1989, by Silent Partner, Inc. (SPI), which on April 28, 1989, had filed in the Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, a petition und
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-03-06 · Published · cited 183× · 672 F.3d 1230; 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20062; 74 ERC (BNA) 1225; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4634; 2012 WL 695007
672 F.3d 1230 (2012) SOLUTIA, INC., Pharmacia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. McWANE, INC., aka Union Foundry, aka M & H Valve, United States Pipe and Foundry Company, Inc., Meadwestvaco Corporation, fka Mead Corporation, fka Union Foundry, fka Woodward Iron, fka Alabama Pipe Company, fka Lynchburg Foundry, fka Standard Foundry, fka Anniston Foundry, FMC Corporation, fka Kilby Steel, United Defense, LP, et al., Defen
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2023-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ark. 67
Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2025-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ark. 59
Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2024-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ark. 67
Cite as 2024 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 18, 2024 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2024 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2024 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2024. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of
McNeil v. Hickspublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995-07-18 · Published · cited 3× · 459 S.E.2d 47; 119 N.C. App. 579; 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 553
459 S.E.2d 47 (1995) 119 N.C. App. 579 Kimetha Rena McNEIL, Plaintiff, v. Kimberly Rae HICKS, Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants. No. COA94-1024. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 18, 1995. David R. Tanis, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant. Pinto, Coates & Kyre, L.L.P. by Richard L. Pinto and Matthew L. Mason, Green
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010-09-28 · Published · cited 51× · 4 A.3d 288; 298 Conn. 495; 2010 Conn. LEXIS 314
4 A.3d 288 (2010) 298 Conn. 495 Rena Sobol ACKERMAN et al. v. SOBOL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LLP, et al. Alfred Casella et al. v. Ruth Sobol et al. Tamar Ackerman et al. v. Bank of America et al. In re Rena Sobol Ackerman Trust. TZVI Rakoszynski et al. v. Bank of America et al. Nos. 18288, 18289. Supreme Court of Connecticut. <
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-12-22 · Published · cited 36× · 774 F.3d 238; 2014 WL 7237744; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24144
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge DUNCAN joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: At issue here is a North Carolina statute that requires physicians to perform an ultrasound, display the sonogram, and describe the fetus to women seeking abortions. A physician must display and describe the image
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-08-21 · Published · cited 95× · 868 F.3d 231
OPINION SMITH, Chief Judge. This opinion addresses two sets of consolidated appeals concerning two pharmaceutical drugs: Lipitor and Effexor XR. In both sets of consolidated appeals, plaintiffs allege that the companies holding the patents related to Lipitor and Effexor XR fraudulently procured and enforced certain of those patents. Plaintiffs further all
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-04-13 · Published · cited 79× · 855 F.3d 126; 2017 WL 1359474
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. A pharmaceutical company holding the patent on a drug sues the manufacturer of a generic version of that drug for patent infringement. The patent-holder and the generic manufacturer later settle, with the former paying the latter not to produce a generic until the patents at issue expire. In FTC v. Actav
Bell v. Toddpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-09-26 · Published · cited 44× · 206 S.W.3d 86
206 S.W.3d 86 (2005) Eleanor BELL et al. v. Roger TODD. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. Assigned on Briefs February 26, 2004. September 14, 2005. Opinion Denying Petition for Rehearing September 26, 2005. Permission to Appeal Denied March 20, 2006. *89 Roger M. Todd, Woodbury, Tennes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 OK 59
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998-09-15 · Published · cited 17× · 504 S.E.2d 802; 130 N.C. App. 711; 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2334; 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 1160; 1998 WL 612988
504 S.E.2d 802 (1998) Anna Mae SHERRILL, Annetta C. White, Linda S. Mintz, Vernette Price, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION a/k/a Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Amoco Oil Company; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; Citgo Petroleum Corporation; Colonial Pipe Line Company; Conoco, Inc. a/k/a Southern Facilities; Crown Central Petroleum Corporation; Exxon Corporation; Marathon Oil Compa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 10× · 2023 OK 59
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004-10-05 · Published · cited 45× · 315 B.R. 321; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1516; 94 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6268; 2004 WL 2244514
315 B.R. 321 (2004) In re CORAM HEALTHCARE CORP. and Coram, Inc., Debtors. Nos.00-3299 (MFW),00-3300 (MFW). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. October 5, 2004. *326 Kenneth E. Aaron, Esquire, Weir & Partners LLP, Laura Davis Jones, Rachel Lowy Werkheiser, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones, Etta Rena Wolfe, Smith, K
Allen v. Daypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006-08-11 · Published · cited 13× · 213 S.W.3d 244; 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 542; 2006 WL 2354799
213 S.W.3d 244 (2006) Kimberly Kay ALLEN, et al. v. John DAY, et al. and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., d/b/a the Tennessean, et al. v. Powers Management, LLC. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. February 24, 2006 Session. August 11, 2006. Permission to Appeal Denied December 27, 2006.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023-05-31 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 OK 59
OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only