Cases

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00200-CR RICHARD GALLANT WISDOM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 4th District Court Rusk County, Texas Trial Court No. CR 14-233 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 266 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Claudia M. Gallant, appeals the judgment of the Marion County Municipal Court denying her motion to dismiss criminal check-fraud charges. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. {¶ 2} On July 26 28, 1989, Claudia wrote two checks pay

Brown, J. After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant was convicted of attempted kidnapping, assault with *410the intent to commit a felony (kidnapping), and assault and battery. The defendant appealed and filed a motion for a new trial. In the motion, the defendant also presented additional claims under the rubric of ineffective assistance of counsel. We disc

Lopez, J. INTRODUCTION In this action, plaintiffs Audrey Dowell (Dowell) and Margaret Ratliff (Ratliff) were evicted from their state subsidized housing for nonpayment of rent. Also named in the suit as a plaintiff is the Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless (MCH), a homeless advocacy organization. They have brought suit against the Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) seeking lo enjoin the DTA’s

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, (1) the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered July 15, 1998, as granted the branch of the motion of the defendant Staten Island Savings Bank which was for partial summary judgment dismissing the fifth cause of the action in the complaint alleging a deceptive trade practice pursuant to General Business Law § 349, and (2

997 F.Supp. 1231 (1998) David Shanon GALLANT, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY; James May, an individual, Defendants. No. C97-0376 BZ. United States District Court, N.D. California. March 27, 1998. *1232 Robert E. Lazo, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff. Michael T. Lucey, Greta Schnetzler, Larr

Cowin, J. The defendant, Thomas S. King, appeals from his convictions of forcible rape of a child under sixteen years, G. L. c. 265, § 22A, and indecent assault and battery of a child under fourteen years, G. L. c. 265, § 13B. In part, the defendant argues that the trial judge improperly admitted the testimony of two “fresh complaint” witnesses. Under the fresh complaint doctrine in effect at the time of trial, the Commonwealth w

King, C.J. At issue in this case is whether the appellate division of the department of employment security acted within statutory and constitutional limits when it refused to hear an appeal filed late as a result of a delayed mail delivery by the United States Postal Service. We reverse and remand to the department of employment security for a hearing on the merits of the appeal. The claimant, Laurie J. Gallan

471 So.2d 858 (1985) Edward Vincent GALLANT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSCONTINENTAL DRILLING COMPANY, Larry Alesi, Frank Herring, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 17008-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 12, 1985. *859 Hunter & Jack by Frances Baker, Shreveport,

POMEROY, Justice. A Justice of the Superior Court denied appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the purpose of which was to test his *735extradition to the State of Georgia.1 This timely appeal resulted. We deny the appeal. Interestingly enough, the appeal is based substantially upon an object

97 B.R. 768 (1989) In re Perri KANTERMAN, Debtor. Alvin GALLANT and Joan Gallant, Plaintiffs, v. Perri KANTERMAN, Donald Kanterman, First Inter-County Bank of New York, Arnold I. Biegen, Marchi Jaffe Steinberg Crystal Katz & Burke, and Joseph G. Blum, in his capacity as temporary receiver of Gallant Securities, Inc. and Gallant Intercapital Corp., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 12318 (HCB), Adv. No. 88-5235A.

[1] OPINION [2] This case came before the Supreme Court on the appeal of the defendant, Freeman K. King, from a judgment of conviction of three counts of assault with intent to murder and one count of possession of cocaine. On appeal, the defendant has raised five issues: (1) the admission of certain evidence allegedly seized pursuant to a defective search warrant, (2) the refusal to sever the assault charges from the defendant's drug charges, (3) the

King J. Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on May 12, 1914, while in the defendant’s employ as a river driver. The action was brought under the provisions of Chapter’258 of the Public Laws of 1909, known as the Employers Liability Act. An amendment was allowed, adding a count at common law, with a stipulation of the parties to report the case to the Law Court upon the e

387 Mass. 464 (1982) 441 N.E.2d 248 COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL KING. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. May 3, 1982. October 13, 1982. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Elizabeth A. Lunt for the defendant. Charles J. Hely, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwe

Horowitz, J. (dissenting) — The majority opinion over*457rules Miller v. Argus Publishing Co., 79 Wn.2d 816, 490 P.2d 101 (1971). Its action in doing so is permitted but not required by Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789, 94 S. Ct. 2997 (1974). In the case of a defamatory statement relating to a private person’s involvement in an e

Wilson, J. This case comes before this court on exceptions to a portion of the charge of the presiding Justice and also to his refusal to direct a verdict of not guilty. The respondent was indicted under fifteen separate counts for immoral practices and taking indecent liberties with and assaults upon three young girls, on five different occasions, widely separated in time. He was tried, however, on only thre

611 F.3d 299 (2010) AMERISURE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAVIGATORS INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-20060. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 13, 2010. *302 David Morgan Pruessner (argued), Jes Alexander, Law Offices of David M. Pruessner, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Innes A.

770 N.E.2d 846 (2002) Steve MALONE, d/b/a IBI/Cousins Insurance Agency and Gallant Insurance Company, a Member of Warrior Insurance Group, Inc., Appellants-Defendants, v. Anna M. BASEY and Sharon Basey, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 73A01-0112-CV-451. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 19, 2002. *847 Karl L. Mulvaney, Dennis F. Cantre

310 F.Supp.2d 871 (2004) Jane DOE, By and Through her mother and next friend, Mary DOE, Plaintiff, v. DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Earl Bryant, individually and officially as principal; and Bonnie King, individually and officially as teacher, jointly and severally, Defendants. No. CIV. 02-40306. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 24, 2004.

653 F.3d 1230 (2011) KANSAS JUDICIAL WATCH; Honorable Charles M. Hart; Robb Rumsey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mike L. STOUT, in his official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications; Jennifer L. Jones, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications; Nancy Anstaett, in her official capacity as a Member of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications; J. Patrick Brazil, i