Cases

RENDERED: JUNE 20, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-0743-MR FAYETTE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JULIE M. GOODMAN, JUDGE ACTION NO. 18-CI-01569 KELVIN BRU

100 N.Y.2d 801 (2003) 798 N.E.2d 1047 766 N.Y.S.2d 654 SARATOGA COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE PATAKI, as Governor of the State of New York, et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) KEITH L. WRIGHT, as Member of the New York State Assembly, et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE E. PATAKI, as Governor of the State of New York, et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

274 F.3d 771 (3rd Cir. 2001) SOUTH CAMDEN CITIZENS IN ACTION; GENEVA SANDERS; PAULINE WOODS; BARBARA PFEIFER; JULITA GILLIARD; OSCAR LISBOA; SHIRLEY RIOS; PHYLLIS HOLMES; GWEN PETERSON; LATOYA COOPER; JULIO LUGOv.NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ROBERT C. SHINN, JR., COMMISSIONER OF THE NJ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ST. LAWRENCE CEMENT CO., L.L.C., INTERVENOR IN D.C., APPELLANT.SOUTH CA

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs bring challenges to certain zoning and environmental ordinances enacted by Defendant Village of Pomona (the “Village”), alleging they are unlawful under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Aet of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), 42

336 F.Supp. 839 (1971) Sherman H. SKOLNICK et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE ELECTORAL BOARD OF ILLINOIS, Defendant, William L. Springer et al., Intervenors. No. 69 C 755. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. September 21, 1971. Order November 5, 1971. Dissenting Opinion November 10, 1971. Memorandum November 15, 1971

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sarah Alhassid and Sarah Dren-nen’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Certify Class Action, ECF No. [190] (the “Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, all supporting and opposing submissions, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons set forth be

254 F.Supp.2d 486 (2003) SOUTH CAMDEN CITIZENS IN ACTION, Geneva Sanders, Pauline Woods, Barbara Pfeiffer, Julita Gilliard, Oscar Lisboa, Phyllis Holmes, Gwen Peterson, Latoya Cooper, Julio Lugo, Lula Williams, and Sharon Christie Potter, Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and Bradley M. Campbell, Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, in his official capacity, Defendants, and S

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to certify class (DE 20), to which Defendant filed a response in opposition (DE 28), Plaintiff filed a reply (DE 38), and Defendant filed a sur-reply (DE 48). Following an appeal, and given the passage of time, the Co

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Kovac v. Barron, 2014 IL App (2d) 121100 Appellate Court F. GARY KOVAC, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellee and Caption Cross-Appellant, v. SANDRA L. BARRON, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth L. Barron, Jr., Dec

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

999 F.Supp. 823 (1998) Ruth Elaine MCCARTHY, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 97-1215-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. April 7, 1998. *824 Bernard E. Goodman, Nancy D. Greene, Gary & Goodman Ltd., Vienna, VA, for Plaintiff. Willis J. Goldsmith, Thomas M. B

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Plaintiffs”) are direct or indirect victims of terrorist acts linked to the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”), against which they hold unsatisfied money judgments. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to enforce these judgments against Defendants-Appellants Alavi Foundation and 650 Fifth Avenue Company (together, “Defendants”),1 pursuant to the Forei

ORDER STEELE,, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (doc. 330). Also pending are certain ancillary filings, including Defendants’ Motion to Re-Urge Motions to Strike or Exclude Experts Farber and McFaddin (doc. 364), Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Newly Disclosed Sampling Data (doc. 365), and Defendants’ Motion to Strike Affida

150 F.Supp.2d 456 (2001) THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY Plaintiff, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., et al., Defendants. Department of Amazonas, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. 00-CV-06617, 00-CV-02881 (NGG)(VVP). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 16, 2001. *457

690 F.Supp. 1393 (1988) BLACK GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE, et al. v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 75-3156. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 20, 1988. *1394 Alice W. Ballard, Samuel & Ballard, Herb Newberg, Earl W. Trent, Jr., for Black Grievance Committee. Frank Finch, III, Philadelphia, Pa.,

785 F.Supp. 1491 (1992) Paul Charles WESCH, Plaintiff, Michael Figures, et al., Intervenors-Plaintiffs, v. Guy HUNT, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-0787. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D. March 9, 1992. Judgment Affirmed May 18, 1992. *1492 David A. Boyett, III and Ferrell S. Anders, Mobile

522 F.Supp. 254 (1981) SEDCO INTERNATIONAL, S. A., Plaintiff, v. William F. CORY and Marcella McKillip, Executors of the Estate of Roy J. Carver, Deceased, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. SEDCO INTERNATIONAL, S. A., Sedco, Inc., and Sedco Energy Corporation (formerly TerraMar Consultants, Inc.), Counterclaim Defendants. Civ. No. 77-85-D. United States District Court, S. D. Iowa, Dave

No opinion. Parts of the decree appealed from amrmed, with costs against the appellant personally. *1153INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. ACCOUNT STATED. Right of action by or against personal representative, see “Executors and Administrators,” § 6. ABUTTING OWNERS. Assessments for expenses of public improvements, see “Municipal Corporations,” § 5. Compensation for taking of or injury