Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court is the plaintiffs Motion to Remand and Request for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees [ECF No. 6]. The defendant filed its Response [ECF No. 9] and the plaintiff filed his Reply [ECF No. 10], so the Motion is now ripe for adjudication. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. <

Nancy Steffen Rahmeyer, J. The plaintiff and defendant in this action are brother and sister and are beneficia-*82ríes of trusts prepared by their father. Carolyn C. Klein brought a Second Amended Petition against her brother, Steven M. Clinton, for breach of fiduciary duty (Count I), requesting an “application for writ of mandamus” compelling production of books and r

959 A.2d 395 (2008) Jennifer A. ELLISON, Appellee v. Damoun M. LOPEZ, Appellant. No. 3379 EDA 2007 Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 25, 2008. Filed October 15, 2008. *396 Sandjai Weaver, Philadelphia, for appellant. BEFORE: LALLY-GREEN, KLEIN and GANTMAN, JJ. OPINION BY KLEIN, J.:

919 A.2d 612 (2007) Steven V. ELLISON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 05-CF-375. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 13, 2007. Decided March 29, 2007. *613 Michael J. Satin, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Richard S. Greenlee, Public Defender Service, were on the

KLEIN, J. ¶ 1 This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for reconsideration of our order affirming the dismissal of Marcus Ellison’s petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA).1 Ellison claimed his prior appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file a petition for allowance of appeal (PAA) in the Supreme Court following our affirmance of his judg

PER CURIAM. The record more than amply supports appellant’s argument relating to excusable neglect. Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to deny appellant’s Motion to Set Aside the Default. See B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Reversed.

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the operation of the Management Control Unit [MCU] of Trenton State Prison, to which prisoners deemed in need of close supervision are assigned, is challenged as violative of the proscription against cruel and unusual punishment and as a violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Constitution. Appellants, inmates who are or have been assi

HAL P. DEKLE, Circuit Judge. This cause came on for hearing upon the defendant’s application to compel arbitration made under section 57.12 of the Florida Statutes. The court heard argument of counsel for the respective parties. The thrust of the complaint for declaratory judgment is that the court declare and adjudicate that certain provisions of a stockholders’ agreement are in contravention to the statutes of this state and

PER CURIAM. Defendant takes this appeal from a final decree entered upon plaintiff’s complaint for dissolution of a partnership between plaintiff and defendant and appointment of a receiver. Upon hearing and stipulation of the parties, the chancellor entered the following order: “The above entitled cause came on to be heard on March 9, 1962, after due notice, upon the plaintiff’s application for ap

707 F.Supp.2d 1287 (2010) KLEIN & HEUCHAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC., and Costar Group, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 8:08-cv-1227-T-30EAJ. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 19, 2010. *1289 Brian J. Aungst, J. Paul Raymond, Joshua Magidson, MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMu

266 N.J. Super. 74 (1993) 628 A.2d 793 BARRIE B. ELLISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CARL B. ELLISON; LOUIS FRIEDMAN AND CHERYL A. FRIEDMAN, T/A FRIEDELL ASSOCIATES, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE EVERGREEN CEMETERY, A CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND BARBARA W. DOWNS,[[1]

CAROLYN C. KLEIN, as member of R. ) Clinton Enterprises, LLC, a Missouri ) Limited Liability Company, on behalf of ) herself and all other similarly situated ) members, and as Co-Trustee of the Ray ) Clinton Irrevocable Trust, the Dorothy ) Clinton Irrevocable Trust, and the Clinton ) Family Trust, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, )

215 Md. 427 (1958) 138 A.2d 648 COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND v. KLEIN [No. 89, September Term, 1957.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided January 30, 1958. The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ., and GRAY, J., Chief Judge of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, specially assigned. Joseph

508 F.2d 898 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Stephen Kirk HEIDEN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Larry Arnold KLEIN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 73-1471 and 73-1570. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 16, 1974. R. N. Harris, Jr., Harris

769 F.Supp. 1090 (1991) ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. ACCU-CUT SYSTEMS, INC., a Nebraska corporation; and Steven Nabity, an individual, Defendants. No. CV. 90-0-833. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. March 13, 1991. *1091 *1092 C.L. Robin

On application of the plaintiff-respondent corporation we transferred this cause to this court from the St. Louis Court of Appeals [opinion there reported in 212 S.W.2d 480] under Art. V. Sec. 10, Const. Mo. 1945 and our Rule 2.06. It is an action in unlawful detainer for breach of a written lease by subletting, brought by respondent in a justice of the peace court in Normandy township, St. Louis county. The property involved is an apartment. The ultimate issues are: whether respondent's evid

[1] Certiorari to the respondent judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals bringing up the record in State ex rel. Klein v. Balsiger et al., 151 S.W.2d 521. The case involves the construction of Sec. 4906, R.S. 1939, Mo. R.S.A., sec. 4906, in the Liquor Control Act. Relator's principal contention is that respondents' opinion gives the statute an impossible interpretation, conflicting with canons of construction which are well settled by the decisions of this court; and that certiorari therefor

Gerard, J. Motion by defendant appearing specially to set aside the service of the summons. The summons was served on the State Superintendent of Insurance, who, pursuant to section 30 of the Insurance Law, had been designated by defendant to receive the service of process. The State Superintendent of Insurance revoked the license of defendant to do business in the State, and the summons was served on him after such revocation.

78 F.3d 983 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 630 Dorothy A. EDWARDS; Afro-American Police Officers League;Houston Police Organization of Spanish Speaking Officers;Lionel Aaron; Bennie Conway; Clement B. Crosby, Jr.; JoseA. Garcia; Richard C. Garcia; Maria L. Guillory; AnthonyR. Jammer; Charles A. McClelland; Silas Montgomery, Jr.;Clyde Phillpot; Carl Wayne Reed; Richard M. Spencer;Bruce D. Williams;

562 F.2d 276 Louis W. HODGES, Ernest R. Pace, David G. Baldwin, JeromeBoulding, Theodore Gibson, Elliot Hampton, Charles Holman,Ellison Jones, George Martin, Robert Matthews, KennethRoberts, Thomas Rumph, John Scott, Thaddeus Springs, CalvinStrothers, and Curtis Tillman, John Washington, Charles E.Allen, # 56176, on behalf of themselves and all otherssimilarly situated who are or have ever been assigned andtransferred to