Cases

Knox v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 03107) Knox v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 03107 Decided on May 11, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Tessa Knox has sued her former employer, John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc. ("JV") on the ground that JV gave an annual $12,000 clothing allowance to male sales associates but not to female sales associates in violation of the Equal Pay Act ("EPA"), 29 U.S.C. § 206(

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge In this breach of contract action arising under Virginia law, a jury found for the plaintiff and counterclaim defendants, Knox Energy, LLC and Consol Energy, Inc., on the ground that there was no mutual assent to enter into the alleged contract. The defendant and counterclaim plaintiff, Gaseo Drilling, Inc.,’ has moved for a new trial pursuant

01/25/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 18, 2018 Session EAST TENNESSEE PILOT’S CLUB, INC. v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 187187-1 John F. Weaver, Chancellor _______

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. In this breach of contract action arising under Virginia law, the party alleged to have breached the contract moved at trial for judgment as a matter of law. The parties argued their positions and I announced my intention to grant the oral motion and then discharged the jury. This opinion sets forth my basis for granting the motion. In summary, I find that t

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supre

Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge Plaintiff Rivko Knox challenges the constitutionality of Arizona Revised Statute ("A.R.S.") § 16-1005(H), as amended in 2016 by Arizona House Bill 2023 (hereinafter referred to as "H.B. 2023"), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Knox contends t

[Cite as Weiler v. Knox Community Hosp., 2021-Ohio-2098.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RICHARD WEILER, ET AL. : JUDGES: : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiffs-Appellants

ORDER Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge Presently pending before the Court in this action brought under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. (“FCA”) and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Zane E. McCrary’s Complaint. [Filing No. 11.] For the reasons detailed herein, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion to D

2024 IL App (4th) 230726 FILED May 29, 2024 NO. 4-23-0726 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT

Smith, J. On June 17, 2002, Fecteau Benefits Group, Inc. (FBG), brought a complaint in the Superior Court against Peter *205L. Knox and Peter L. Knox & Associates (collectively, Knox), alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith, intentional interference with an advantageous business relationship, fraud, and a violation of G. L. c. 93A, a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 12, 2024 Session THOMPSON SCHOOL ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, ET AL. v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ET AL. FILED Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County FEB 0 No. 2-246-22 William T. Ailor, Judge EB 94 2025 Clerk of the Appellate Courts REc'd By No. E2024-00310-COA-R3-CV This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action regarding a decision of the Knox County Commission to amend zoning for the subject property. The trial cour

GRATTON, Chief Judge Travis David Knox appeals from the district court’s order affirming the Idaho Central Sex Offender Registry’s final order. The final order determined that Knox must register as a sex offender for as long as he lives in Idaho because his sex offense convictions in Oregon are equivalent to an aggravated offense in Idaho. We affirm. I.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas A. Varlan, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This civil matter is before the.Court on the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Knox County, Tennessee, Knox County Schools, and Tim Berry [Doc. 6], Plaintiff filed a response [Doc. 10], After careful consideration of the complaint and the relevant law, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion to dismiss [D

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0052p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ RICHLAND BOOKMART, INC. d/b/a TOWN AND X - VIDEO SUPERSTORE, INC.; and GREG TURNER, -- COUNTRY BOOKSTORE; KNOXVI

Case: 18-11756 Date Filed: 04/30/2020 Page: 1 of 24 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-11756 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-02538-ODE BRAD KNOX,

555 F.3d 512 (2009) RICHLAND BOOKMART, INC. d/b/a Town and Country Bookstore; Knoxville Adult Video Superstore, Inc.; and Greg Turner, d/b/a Raymond's Place, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 07-6469, 08-5036. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 11, 2008. Decide

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0218p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ANDREW WILLIAMS BANNISTER, deceased, by his Co- │ Administrators Ad Litem,

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: In this declaratory judgment action, the district court granted two motions for summary judgment by Landmark Insurance Co. (“Landmark”) and denied a cross-motion by Scottsdale Insurance Co. (“Scottsdale”). The court concluded that Landmark did not owe a duty to defend and was not obligated to cover breach of warranty claims brought in an underlying suit against Shade Tree Electric, Inc. (“