Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Kobe Wolf Brown”
United States v. Mohammad Al Sharaireipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2792 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Mohammad Al Sharairei Defen
Francesca Allen v. Wells Fargo & Companypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2781 ___________________________ Francesca Allen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the Wells Fargo & Company 401(k) Plan; John Sterling Ross, and all other individuals similarly situated; Mary Lou Shank
Pinkins v. Statepublic domain
799 N.E.2d 1079 (2003) Darryl Keith PINKINS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 45A03-0301-PC-30. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 8, 2003. Transfer Denied March 5, 2004. *1082 Charles E. Stewart, Jr., Crown Point, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney Gener
KD v. Douglas County School Districtpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1772 ___________________________ KD, Parent, Natural Guardian and Next Friend of minor LD; JD, Parent, Natural Guardian and Next Friend of minor LD Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Douglas County
[Cite as United Gulf Marine, L.L.C. v. Continental Refining Co., L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-666.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY UNITED GULF MARINE, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-18-35 v. CONTINENTAL REFINING COMPANY, LLC, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Religious Sisters of Mercy v. Xavier Becerrapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1890 ___________________________ The Religious Sisters of Mercy; Sacred Heart Mercy Health Care Center, (Alma, MI); SMP Health System; University of Mary; Catholic Benefits Association; Diocese of Fargo; Catholic Charities of North Dakota; Catholic Medical Association
Pacific Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. M. v. Sadoharu Marupublic domain
493 F.Supp. 192 (1979) In the Matter of the Complaint of Pacific Bulk Carriers, Inc., as Owner of the M. V. ATLANTIC HOPE for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. PACIFIC BULK CARRIERS, INC., Plaintiff and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. M. V. SADOHARU MARU and Yamashita Shinnihon Kisen, K. K., Third-Party Defendants. No. 73 Civ. 3220 (CES). United States District Court, S. D. New York.</
Otto Gerdau Co. v. Bowne-Morton's Stores, Inc.public domain
Tilzer, J. The plaintiff sues for negligence in connection with the storing of certain merchandise at the defendant’s warehouse. The first cause of action concerned the shipment of chilies; the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $5,970.31. The second cause of action was in negligence and concerned a shipment of tumeric. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the defendant. No motion to set aside the ver
249 F.Supp.2d 622 (2003) ID SECURITY SYSTEMS CANADA, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.A.99-577. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 28, 2003. *629 Rudolph Garcia, J. Clayton Undercofler, III, William A. De Stefano, Kara H. Good child, Saul Ewing LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for ID Secur
MacH-tronics, Incorporated v. Zirpolipublic domain
316 F.2d 820 MACH-TRONICS, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Petitioner,v.The Honorable Alfonso J. ZIRPOLI, Judge of the United StatesDistrict Court of the Northern District ofCalifornia, Southern Division, Respondent. No. 18349. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. April, 1, 1963. Howard, P
Dollac Corporation v. Margon Corporationpublic domain
164 F.Supp. 41 (1958) DOLLAC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MARGON CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. No. 603-56. United States District Court Third District New Jersey. July 11, 1958. *42 *43 *44 Kirschstein, Kirschstein & Ottinger, New York City, Harry B. Rook,
513 F.Supp. 1100 (1981) ZENITH RADIO CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al. Defendants. NATIONAL UNION ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al. Defendants. In re JAPANESE ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civ. A. Nos. 74-2451, 74-3247. MDL 189. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.</
Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.public domain
367 F.Supp. 258 (1973) The TELEX CORPORATION and Telex Computer Products, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant. Nos. 72-C-18, 72-C-89. United States District Court, N. D. Oklahoma. September 17, 1973. Amended Judgment and Decree November 9, 1973. *259