Cases

MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: *87Plaintiff LG Capital Funding, LLC ("plaintiff"), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in Brooklyn, New York, commenced the instant action on May 31, 2016 by filing, together with certain other documents, a verified complaint ("Compl." or the "complaint," ECF No. 1) in this court ag

*295 OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge DiFiore. The issue on appeal is whether there is personal jurisdiction over defendant, a Spanish winery, under New York’s long-arm jurisdiction statute, and consequently subject matter jurisdiction over the parties’ dispute under Business Corpo

This dispute, which raises issues of long-arm jurisdiction, involves two Spanish businesses, neither of which is authorized to do business in New York or has offices, employees, telephone listings, or bank accounts in New York. It is undisputed that plaintiff, a limited liability company, and defendant, a Spanish winery, entered into an oral agreement in or about March 2005 in Spain. Under the agreement, plaintiff agreed to procure American importers for d

PER CURIAM. For the second time in this trademark infringement case, the plaintiffs-appellants (Distiller) appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees (Restaurant). At the initial trial, the district judge granted Restaurant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence and dismissed the co

MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the ruling of the district court granting appellees’ (Restaurant’s) 1 motion for directed verdict under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) grounded on appellants’ (Distiller’s) 2 failur

403 F.Supp. 643 (1975) V. & L. CICIONE, INC., et al. v. C. SCHMIDT & SONS, INC. and Wm. H. Pflaumer & Sons, Inc. Civ. A. No. 73-1804. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. October 29, 1975. *644 *645 John T. Clary, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs. Charles I. Th

170 P.3d 854 (2007) Randy KREFT and Colleen Kreft, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ADOLPH COORS COMPANY, Coors Brewing Company, Bacardi USA, Inc., Kobrand Corporation, Beer Institute Inc., Heineken USA, Inc., Brown-Forman Corporation, Diageo North America, Inc., and Mark Anthony Brands, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 05CA2315. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. October 4, 2007.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, Chief Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commenced this civil enforcement action against defendants David Smith and Timothy McGinn, along with various entities owned and controlled by McGinn and Smith: McGinn, Smith & Co., Inc. (“MS & Co.”), McGinn, Smith A

309 F.Supp. 1154 (1969) JAMES BURROUGH LTD., and Kobrand Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. William LESHER, d/b/a Beefeater's and Doubl L Washington, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. IP 57-C-163. United States District Court S. D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. July 11, 1969. *1155 Lauterstein & Lauterstein, New York City, and V. A. T

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, District Judge: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in its entirety because Plaintiff fails to state a claim of disability discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Eric Shinseki, as former S

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CELESTIALRX INVESTMENTS, LLC ) and KRITTIKA LIFE SCIENCES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11733-VCG ) JOSEPH J. KRIVULKA; LEONARD ) MAZUR; DONALD OLSEN; JJK ) PARTNERS, LLC; MIST

675 F.Supp. 555 (1987) UNITED STATES of America v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA; Robert E. Hanson, State Treasurer of North Dakota. Civ. No. A1-86-212. United States District Court, D. North Dakota. Southwestern Division. June 24, 1987. Richard A. Correa, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles A. Miller, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Bismarck, N.D., for plaint

Justice Stevens announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which The Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice O’Connor join. The United States and the State of North Dakota exercise concurrent jurisdiction over the Grand Forks Air Force Base and the Minot Air Force Base. Each sovereign has its own separate regulatory objectives with respect to the area over which it has authority. The Dep

Lane, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, reported in full at 182 USPQ 269 (1969), dismissing appellant’s opposition to registration of SIGN OF THE BEEFEATER. 1 for “restaurant services.” Opposer is the owner of the prior registration of BEEFEATER2 for “gin.” The opposition is based on the ground that SIGN OF TH

98 Ill. App.3d 126 (1981) 423 N.E.2d 1373 DUGAN OIL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COALITION OF AREA LABOR, Defendant-Appellant. — PATTERSON BROTHERS OIL AND GAS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. H. BRENT DeLAND et al., Defendants-Appellants. — GEORGE ANDERSON et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. H. BRENT DeLAND et al., Defendants-Appellants. — PATTERSON BROTHERS OIL AND GAS, INC., et al., Plaintif

378 F.Supp. 376 (1974) FAIRFIELD COUNTY BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NARRAGANSETT BREWING COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. No. B-87. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 19, 1974. Thomas E. Minogue, Jr., Joel E. Kanter, Bridgeport, Conn., for plaintiff. David M. Reilly, Jr., Reilly, Peck, Raffile & Lasala, New Haven, Conn., for defenda

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER McLAREN, District Judge. This matter arises on the motion of plaintiff, J.W.T., INC'. (“JWT”),' to maintain these twelve antitrust cases as class actions pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b).1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. In these cases, JWT, a liquor retailer, has brought suit against twelve alcoholic