Cases

380 F.Supp. 1294 (1971) Robert P. KOEHLER et al. v. Thomas L. CUMMINGS, Jr., et al. Civ. A. No. 4525. United States District Court, M. D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. June 11, 1971. As Amended July 22, 1974. *1295 *1296 *1297 Herbert R. R

USCA11 Case: 21-13663 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 12/21/2022 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13663 ____________________ JARROD JOHNSON, Indivi

144 F.Supp.2d 958 (2000) Mary Grace McCONKEY and husband, Don McConkey, Plaintiffs, v. McGHAN MEDICAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 3:98-CV-003. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division. July 6, 2000. *959 *960 Lisa June Cox, Jackson, Tenn.; Michael R. Hugo, Samu

WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. ¶ 82. {concurring in part and dissenting in part). Because I conclude that this court should extend the discovery rule to actions brought to enforce Wisconsin's Solid Waste Law, I respectfully dissent. ¶ 83. In 1970, Chrysler Corporation knowingly violated the State’s law with respect to disposal of

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Fennell v. Illinois Central R.R. Co., 2012 IL 113812 Caption in Supreme WALTER FENNELL, Appellee, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD Court: COMPANY, Appellant. Docket No. 113812 Filed December 28, 2012 Rehearing denied April 18, 2013 Held Where a Mississippi plai

590 F.Supp. 45 (1984) John M. DIMIDOWICH, dba Micro Image, Plaintiff, v. BELL & HOWELL; Does I through XX, Defendants. No. CV S 82-1086-EDP. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 19, 1984. *46 Robert F. Koehler, Jr., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff. Lynn H. Pasahow, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen,

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Dimidowich appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his antitrust action, in which he challenged Bell & Howell’s (“B & H”) policy of refusing to sell replacement parts for its microfilm equipment to independent companies that service B & H equipment. We affirm the dismissal of D