Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Kohler Co v. Kohler Intl Ltd”
Fuji Kogyo Co. LTD v. Pacific Bay Intlpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0312p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - F
Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION RIDGWAY, Judge: In this action, Plaintiffs.Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co., Ltd., et al. (collectively “Brother”) challenge various aspects of the Final Results of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain steel threaded rod from the People’s Repub
Lamm v. Bekins Van Lines Co.public domain
139 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2001) Mark D. LAMM, an individual, and Beate Lamm, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. BEKINS VAN LINES CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 00-T-224-S. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 17, 2001. *1301 *1302 Edward S. Brown, Reese, Reese &
350 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2004) AN GIANG AGRICULTURE AND FOOD IMPORT EXPORT COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Catfish Farmers of America, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 04-128, No. 03-00563. United States Court of International Trade. October 8, 2004. White & Case LLP, Washington, DC (Walter J. Spak, Edmund W. Sim, Albert Lo, Adams C. L
Piller v. Princeton Realty Assoc. LLCpublic domain
Piller v Princeton Realty Assoc. LLC (2019 NY Slip Op 04518) Piller v Princeton Realty Assoc. LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 04518 Decided on June 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Report
Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United Statespublic domain
Opinion Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge In this consolidated action, plaintiffs Pa-pierfabrik August Koehler AG (“Koehler”) and Appleton Papers, Inc. contested the amended final results issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the ^Department”) to conclude the second administrative review (“AR2”) of
Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This case returns to court following remand ordered by the Court of Appeals for *1352 the Federal Circuit in Papierfabrik August Koehler AG v. United States, 413 Fed.Appx. 227 (Fed.Cir.2011) (“Koehler
ITT Corp. v. Xylem Group, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on (1) Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [78], (2) Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Michael B. Mazis, Ph.D. [76], (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Damages [70], (4) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Robert A. Hutchins, CPA, as to a Reasonable Roy
*795 OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, in which the sole remaining issue is a counterclaim filed by Defendant Wartburg Enterprises, Inc. (‘Wartburg”) against Plaintiff Jonibach Management Trust, a South African company trading as Bumbo International Trust, (“Bumbo”), al
Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.public domain
268 F.Supp.2d 1126 (2002) CHIRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC., Defendant. No. CIV.S-00-1252 WBS GG. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 24, 2002. *1127 Paul Joseph Riley, Morrison and Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Eric S. Walters, Morrison and Foerster, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff. Jack Vi
Kennedy v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 23-1276T (Filed: December 11, 2025) ) JOHN T. KENNEDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES,
Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. Kerkhoffpublic domain
504 F.Supp.2d 464 (2007) Heidi BROWN, and Heidi Brown as Parent and Next Friend of Trevor Rhiner, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Paul KERKHOFF; Kerkhoff Chiropractic; The Masters Circle; Dr. Larry Markson; Dr. Bob Hoffman; Dr. Dennis Perman; and John Does, Defendants. No. 4:06-cv-00342-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.</
Bank One Corp. v. Comm'rpublic domain
CONTENTS FINDINGS OF FACT. 183 I. Background. 183 A. Stipulations of Fact. 183 B. Briefs on CD-ROM With Appropriate Hyperlinks . 183 C. Relevant Taxpayers. 183 1. FCC . 183 2. First Chicago NBD Corp. 184
425 F.2d 1318 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Respondent. No. 27699. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 18, 1970. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 7, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B