Cases

Opinion and OedeR RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Raymond T. Kim (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants Korea Trade Promotion-Investment Agency (“KOTRA”), Sung Pil Um (“Um”), and Sung Hun Lee (“Lee,” and collectively with KOTRA and Um, “Defendants”), asserting numerous claims of discrimination and retaliation pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 2

—In related actions, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note and guarantees, the defendant Charles R. Chung appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated April 7, 1999, which denied those branches of his cross motion which were, inter alia, to dismiss the complaint in Action No. 2 insofar as asserted against him for lack of personal jurisdiction. Ordered that the order is affirmed, wi

In related actions to rescind a personal guarantee of a corporate obligation (Action No. 1) and to recover a money judgment on a promissory note and nine guarantees (Action No. 2), Korea First Bank, New York Agency, a defendant in Action No. 1 and the plaintiff in Action No. 2, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), entered May 7, 1997, which, upon an order of the same court, dated December 9, 1996, (1) is in favor of the

282 F.Supp.2d 6 (2003) ALBEE TOMATO CO., INC., E. Armata, Inc., R & C Communale, Inc., Costa & Harris, Inc., Craig-Ann Produce, Inc., D'Arrigo Bros. Co. of New York, Inc., Fierman Produce Exchange, Inc., Finest Fruits, Inc., G & B Produce, Inc., Hunts Point Tomato Co., Inc., Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc., L & K Tomatoes, Inc., L & P Fruit Corp., M & R Tomato Distributors, Inc., Morris Okun, Inc., M & R Trading Co., Inc., Rubin

In related actions to rescind a personal guarantee of a corporate obligation (Action No. 1) and to recover a money judgment on a promissory note and nine guarantees (Action No. 2), the defendant in Action No. 2, Vincent R. DeAngelis, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), dated September 29, 1995, as denied his cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint in Action No. 2 insofar as asserted agains

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CYNTHIA WARMBIER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-977 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA, Defendant.

HALL, Circuit Judge: Before us on appeal is a matter of first impression regarding the interpretation of § 201 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1610 note) (“TRIA”) and §§ 1610(f)(1) and 1610(g) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) (codified at 28 U.S.C.). The petitioners are family members of victims of state sponsored terrorism.

BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge "What the heck did you do to my kid?"1 This is the anguished question voiced by the mother of Otto Warmbier when, after *36detaining the young man for over 17 months, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea ("North Korea") returned Otto's comatose body to the United States.2

269 F.Supp.2d 424 (2003) KOREA LIFE INSURANCE CO., LTD. and Morning GHory Investment (L) Limited, Plaintiffs, v. MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. No. 99 Civ.12175 AKH. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 1, 2003. *426 John David Lovi, McDermott, Will & Emery, New York City, for Plaintiffs.</

417 F.Supp.2d 652 (2006) U.S. MATERIAL SUPPLY, INC., Plaintiff, v. KOREA EXCHANGE BANK, and Keb N.Y. Financial Corp., as successor in interest to Korea Exchange Bank New York Branch, Defendants. Civil No. 05-2605 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 27, 2006. *653 Seth N. Broder, Scott Marcus, Marcus Brode

DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On December 21, 2012, the Plaintiff State of New York (the “State”) filed this complaint against the Defendant King Mountain Tobacco Company, d/b/a/ King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc. (“King Mountain”); Mountain Tobacco Distributing Company Inc.; and Delbert Lauren Wheeler, Sr., alleging violations of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2341-2346 (

280 F.Supp.2d 314 (2003) Raymond Anthony SMITH, as Administrator of the Estate of George Eric Smith, deceased; and Katherine Soulas, in her own right, on behalf of her minor children, and as Executrix of the Estate of Timothy Soulas, deceased Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK and Honorable John W. Snow, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendants. No. 03 CIV. 5658(HB). United States District Co

421 F.Supp.2d 627 (2005) John M. MURPHY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. KOREA ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 04CIV2598(RJH HBP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 19, 2005. *628 Herald Price Fahringer, Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria LLP, New York City, Robert Fryd, Washaw Burst

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge. Contents I. INTRODUCTION.547 II.BACKGROUND.549 A. Rule 56.1 Statements.549 B. Factual Background.549 1. Governance Structure of ACHA and ACIC.. •..550 2. 1994 ACHA Agreement with Local 1578 .550 •3. Demand for Payment of Withdrawal Liability.551 C

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Judge MICHAEL joined. *511 OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Brunswick County-appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment

655 F.Supp.2d 308 (2009) Kwame OWUSU, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE, et al., Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 6981 (DAB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 14, 2009. *311 Kwame Owusu, Ridgefield, NJ, pro se. Martha A. Lees, Office of New York State Attorney General, New York, NY, Michael T. Ryan, Hsbc Ban

*1168CHEN, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that disgorgement of profits is not a proper remedy where an individual private plaintiff alleges a violation of California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) and the requested disgorgement would not be restitutionary in nature.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered April 20, 2005, which, in an action involving defendant City’s obligation to provide discharge planning for plaintiffs, a class consisting of inmates receiving treatment for mental illness while incarcerated in a “City Jail” (see 185 Misc 2d 420 [2000], affd for reasons stated 276 AD2d 440 [2000]), declared that inmates housed in forensic units located at Bellevue, Kin

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge Plaintiff BAE Systems Technology Solution & Services, Inc. (“BAE”) and Defendant the Republic of Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program . Administration (“DAPA”) entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”), in conjunction with a Letter of Agreement between the United States and the Republic of Korea to upgrade the Republic of Kore

Judge Chin dissents in a separate opinion. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *154 John Doe is a judgment creditor who seeks attachment and turnover of electronic fund transfers (" EFTs ") initiated by sanctioned foreign terrorist organizations w