Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kristin Ann Blankenship”
OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., P.J., and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., joined. Kristine Blankenship (“Plaintiff’) sued Anesthesiology Consultants Exchange, P.C. (“Defendant”) alleging, in part, that as a result of Defendant’s failure to
Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 237 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-25-612 KRISTIN JOHNS Opinion Delivered April 15, 2026 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE VAN BUREN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.
Hurt v. Shelby County Board of Educationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge This case arises from Daniel Acker, Jr.’s horrific twenty-five year practice of exploiting his position as an elementary school teacher to convert the Shelby County school system into his personal sexual hunting ground. It is an action under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1681-88), 42 U.S'.C
Gordon v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the August 1, 2018 Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Mark L. Carman (Doc. # 73), in which he recommended that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 43). Plaintiffs, a putative class of Defendant's customers, and Defendant object to portions to the Recommendation.
In Re Durczynskipublic domain
405 B.R. 880 (2009) In re Kevin/Kristine DURCZYNSKI, Debtor(s). No. 08-37033. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. April 29, 2009. *882 DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge. This cause comes before the Court after a Hearing on the Motion of the United States Trustee to Dismiss Case
State v. Farrispublic domain
[Cite as State v. Farris, 2022-Ohio-3584.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-21-033 Appellee Trial Court No. 2017 CR 0414 v. Bret Farris DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Ronald Gaylon Hargrove v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed March 14, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00200-CR __________ RONALD GAYLON HARGROVE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 50th District Court Baylor County,
Desoto Gathering Co. v. Ramseypublic domain
HOWARD W. BRILL, Chief Justice | petitioner DeSoto Gathering Co., LLC (“DeSoto”), has filed a petition for a writ of prohibition requesting that this court prohibit the Faulkner County Circuit Court from conducting further proceedings on a complaint filed by the respondents.1 Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 1-2(a)(3) (2015), we have jurisdiction of cases involving |
In re Updated List of Attorneys 2017public domain
Cite as 2017 Ark. 222 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE UPDATED LIST OF Opinion Delivered June 8, 2017 ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY 2017 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On April 21, 2017, we issued an opinion pursuant to Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar identifying attorneys who were suspended from the practice of law
Robert Braun v. Bearman Industries, LLCpublic domain
RENDERED: OCTOBER 23, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2024-SC-0277-DG ROBERT BRAUN APPELLANT ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2023-CA-0636 FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT NO. 21-CI-03016 BEARMAN INDUSTRIES, LLC AND
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi
Luquetta v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.public domain
OMNIBUS ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Preemption and Further Reconsideration (DE # 1484), filed May 17, 2011.1 Defendants move for reconsideration of the Court’s earlier Omnibus Order Denying Dism
Sanders v. Sheltonpublic domain
POWERS, Justice, dissenting. The deed of trust, from which the trustee derived his power of sale, expressly required notice of the foreclosure sale “as provided by the Texas Property Code.” I would hold the trustee’s notice insufficient for failing to comply with the statutory requirement that the notice “include a statement of the earliest time at which the sale will begin.” Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 51.002(b). The
Winn v. Statepublic domain
OPINION This is an appeal from a conviction of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Appellant, Patrick Kendale Winn, was indicted for the offenses of auto theft and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, enhanced by two prior convictions of theft by receiving and burglary of a building. He pled not guilty and trial was to a jury. The State opted to submit only the unauthorized use *Page 285 of a motor vehicle charge to the j
Koehl v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Appellant, Eric Wallace Koehl, appeals his judgment of conviction for the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.07 (Vernon 1989). Appellant waived his right to a jury trial. The court rejected his not guilty plea and after finding the two enhancement paragraphs of the indictment to be true, assessed punishment at thirty (30) years confinement in the Institutional Division o
In Re Aurora Dairy Corp. Organic Milk Marketingpublic domain
621 F.3d 781 (2010) In re AURORA DAIRY CORP. ORGANIC MILK MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. *782 Kristine Mothershead, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Leonie Lloyd, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. Aurora Organic Dairy, doing business as Aurora Organic Dairy; Quality Assurance International, Inc.; Case Vander Eyk, Jr., doing b
Rhode v. Hallpublic domain
582 F.3d 1273 (2009) Brandon RHODE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hilton HALL, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-16960. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 17, 2009. *1277 Thomas H. Dunn and Brian S. Kammer (Court-Appointed), GA Resource Ctr., Atlanta, GA, for Rhode. Patricia
In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigationpublic domain
797 F.Supp.2d 1312 (2011) In re CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: Luquetta v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:09-cv-23432-JLK, CD. Cal. Case No. CV09-6967-GHK. Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A. S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:09-cv-23235-JLK, N.D. Cal. Case No. 4:09-cv-3250. Duval v. Citizens Financial Group, Inc., N.D. Ill. Case No. 10-cv-00533, S.D. Fla. Case No. 1:10-cv-21080-JLK. Daniels v. Citizens Fi
Stace Lee Thompson v. The City of Lavergnepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 13, 2005 Session STACE LEE THOMPSON v. THE CITY OF LAVERGNE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 01-2556MI Robert E. Corlew III, Chancellor No. M2003-02924-COA-R3-CV - November 16, 2005 This appeal involves an action brought by Lieutenant Stace Thompson of the
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT