Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Kristin M Miller”
*785VAIDIK, Chief Judge, concurring in result. [81] In this case, the lead opinion concludes that Jeffrey and Cynthia Miller’s fifth amended complaint — in which they sought to name Kristine Danz as John Doe # 8 — does not relate back to the filing of the Millers’ original complaint. I agree, but I reach that conclusion because the facts show that the
On Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A05-1401-PL-45. DICKSON, Justice. This appeal challenges summary judgment in favor of a named defendant substi- ' tuted in an amended complaint for a previously unknown “John Doe” defendant after expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm. This particular appeal
Curt Pearman d/b/a Greenwood Professional Park v. T. Ryan Jackson and Kristin M. Jacksonpublic domain
SHARPNACK, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case Curt Pearman, who as a landlord does business as Greenwood Professional Park, appeals from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of former tenants, T. Ryan Jackson and Kristin Jackson (the Jacksons), in his action against them alleging breach of a lease agreement by abandoning the leased pre
626 F.3d 586 (2010) KRISTIN BROOKS HOPE CENTER, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. No. 09-1310. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 9, 2010. Decided December 3, 2010. *587 Barbara A. Miller argued the cause of the pe
Miller v. Advantage Behavioral Health Systemspublic domain
ORDER CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Plaintiff Gloria Jane Miller alleges that Defendant Advantage Behavioral Health Systems terminated her employment because of her. age in'violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (ADEA). Advantage seeks- dismissal of this action based on lack of subject matter
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 25, 2023 NO. 03-21-00039-CV Michael Garrett, M. D. and Kristin Held, M.D., Appellants v. The Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Ian Shaw, Bradley Miller, Donnie Lewis, Jenny Yoakum, Rick Fernandez, Daniel Guerrero, Lori Henke, Donna Montemayor, Julie Spier, Rick Tisch, and Suze
People v. Millerpublic domain
916 N.E.2d 10 (2009) 333 Ill.Dec. 891 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brandon D. MILLER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-07-0391. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. August 20, 2009. *12 John A. Barsanti, Kane County State's Attorney, St. Charles, IL, Lawrence M. Bauer, Dep
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00039-CV Michael Garrett, M. D. and Kristin Held, M.D., Appellants v. The Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Ian Shaw, Bradley Miller, Donnie Lewis, Jenny Yoakum, Rick Fernandez, Daniel Guerrero, Lori Henke, Donna Montemayor, Julie Spier, Rick Tisch, and Suzette Tijerina, in their Official Capacities as members of the St
Kristin Mayes v. Joseph Bidenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN K. MAYES; STATE OF No. 22-15518 ARIZONA; AL REBLE; PHOENIX LAW ENFORCEMENT D.C. No. 2:21-cv- ASSOCIATION; UNITED PHOENIX 01568-MTL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 493, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States; ALEJA
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Millerpublic domain
ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. Introduction and Background Plaintiff instituted the instant action seeking a declaration that it is under no *1238duty to pay for the defense of or to indemnify Defendants Charles Miller and Trent Fricks in an underlying lawsuit against them under the terms of a
In the Interest of S.M., Minor Childpublic domain
BOWER, Judge. A father appeals the juvenile court order terminating his parental rights. We find there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support termination of the father's parental rights and termination is in the child's best interests. We affirm the decision of the juvenile court. I. Background Facts & Proceedings
GINO CICERCHIA v. KRISTIN KAY CICERCHIApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GINO CICERCHIA, Appellant, v. KRISTIN KAY CICERCHIA, Appellee. No. 4D21-3578 [October 13, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen
Kristin Worth v. Bob Jacobsonpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2248 ___________________________ Kristin Worth; Austin Dye; Axel Anderson; Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus; Second Amendment Foundation; Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. Plaintiffs - Appellees
Kristin Mayes v. Joseph Bidenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN K. MAYES, Attorney No. 22-15518 General; STATE OF ARIZONA; AL REBLE; PHOENIX LAW D.C. No. ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION; 2:21-cv-01568- UNITED PHOENIX FIREFIGHTERS MTL ASSOCIATION LOCAL 493, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States;
Chadmark, LLC v. Kristin Bushpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1475 Filed August 21, 2019 CHADMARK, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. KRISTIN BUSH, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge. Trucking company appeals a district court’s calculation of damages resulting from a motor vehicle
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commissionpublic domain
251 P.3d 400 (2011) Roy MILLER; Thomas F. Husband; Jennifer Bryson; and Corpus Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs/Petitioners/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION; and Kristin Mayes, William Mundell, Jeff Hatch-Miller, Gary Pierce, and Mike Gleason, in their official capacities as members of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Defendants/Respondents/Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV 09-0789.
ADO Home Services, LLC v. Kristin L. Frykmanpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges O’Brien, Causey and Bernhard Argued by videoconference ADO HOME SERVICES, LLC v. Record No. 0414-24-4 KRISTIN L. FRYKMAN OPINION BY JUDGE DAVID BERNHARD
Travis v. Millerpublic domain
226 F.Supp.2d 663 (2002) Onzie TRAVIS, v. Vivian T. MILLER, Susan Carmody, (individually and in their official capacity), Hon. Arnold New, Hon. Barbara Joseph, Hon. Tama Myers-Clark, Hon. Bonavitacola, Esq., Catherine Marshall, Esq., Leon O. Dark, Janet Fasy Dowds, Jay Pensak, Carmen Lineberger, Esq., and Gerald M. Alston, Esq. No. 99-CV-987. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood Citypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN HART, individually and as No. 22-17008 co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C. No. as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 4:21-cv-02653- KYLE HART; W.H., individually and YGR as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appell
Kristin Perry v. Dennis Hollingsworthpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. No. 20-16375 STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:09-cv-02292- WHO CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, OPINION KQED, INC.,