Cases

WOOD, Chief Judge. Kristine Bunch spent 17 years in an Indiana prison based on a state conviction for the murder of her son. Bunch’s conviction rested on testimony and evidence apparently fabricated by. a federal forensic chemist, William Kinard. Kinard’s conduct came to light during post-conviction proceedings in Indiana’s courts, prompting the Indiana Court of Appeals to rever

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: JON LARAMORE GREGORY F. ZOELLER Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP Attorney General of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana IAN MCLEAN HILARY BOWE RICKS Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana JANE E. RALEY Center on Wrongful Convictions Bluhm Legal Clinic Northwestern Un

CRONE, Judge, dissenting. “To prevail on appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief, a petitioner must show that the evidence as a whole leads unerringly and unmistakably to a conclusion opposite that reached by the post-conviction court.” Kubsch, 934 N.E.2d at 1144. I believe that Bunch has failed to meet this burden as to any of her claims, and therefore I respectfully dissent.

RILEY, Chief Judgé. Gloria Bunch appeals the grant of summary judgment to her former employer in her lawsuit alleging discrimination and retaliation leading to wrongful termination. We affirm the judgment of the district court. 2 See 28 U.S.C., § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction).

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: On July 9, 2015, following a nine-week trial, a jury convicted -defendant Phillip Kenner (“Kenner”) of one count of conspiring to commit,wire-fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One of the superseding indictment); four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Counts Two, Three, Four,

ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is back before the court following the opinion of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. MacDonald (MacDonald XI), 641 F.3d 596 (4th Cir.2011), vacating this court’s decision 1 to deny Movant Jeffrey MacDonald’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [DE-111]<

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................962 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................962 A. Underlying Criminal Proceedings....................................962

OPINION HORN, Judge. At issue are rights of way along the eastern shore of Lake Sammamish in King County, Washington. The plaintiffs in these consolidated lawsuits allege that when the United States Department of Transportation, Surface Transportation Board (STB) issued a Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU), the federal government denied plaintiffs a rever-sionary interest in the right of way located on th

455 F.Supp.2d 1018 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ira W. GENTRY, Jr., Defendant. No. CR-06-0464-A-PHX-SRB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. October 5, 2006. *1019 Marc Jeffrey Victor, Victor & Hall PLC, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant. Michelle Rae Hamilton-Burns, U.S. Attorney's Office, Phoenix, AZ, f

OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case, before the court after trial, originally was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California in 1983 and was transferred to the United States Court of Federal Claims on April 1, *3242004, as a takings claim.

[Cite as State v. Fenderson, 2024-Ohio-1176.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-23-041 Appellee Trial Court No. 2019 CR 0393 v. Takye S. Fenderson DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

OPINION James T. Campbell, Justice Appellant James Duvall Ryder appeals from his convictions by jury of the offenses of aggravated sexual assault of a child,1 indecency with a child by contact2 and indecency with a child by exposure3 and the resulting concurrent sentences of 99, 20 and 10 years of imprisonment. Appellan

[Cite as State v. Jeter, 2024-Ohio-1442.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-23-034 Appellant Trial Court No. 2022 CR 0098 v. Curtis Jeter DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee

[Cite as State v. Sanders, 2024-Ohio-2235.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Hon. Andrew J. K

[Cite as State v. Lester, 2018-Ohio-3041.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 105992 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

Opinion issued May 6, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00557-CR ——————————— GEOFFREY FERGUSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

314 Argued and submitted July 16, reversed and remanded October 21, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERICK JOAQUIN, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 16CR70691; A167411 476 P3d 1263 Defendant appeal

MEMORANDUM Bartle, District Judge. Plaintiff Dorothy Stone (“Stone”) has sued her employer, Trader Joe’s Company (“Trader Joe’s”), for age discrimination and retaliation. Her complaint alleges violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. §§ 951 et seq. Before the court

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 13 2020, 9:05 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Cou

01/04/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 17, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ADAM DEWAYNE HOLMES Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 109529 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2021-00326-CCA-R3-CD Th