Cases

803 F.2d 358 55 USLW 2263 George GOFF, Appellee,v.Crispus NIX, Warden; Hal Farrier, Director of Corrections;Kurt Gary, Correctional Officer; CorrectionalOfficer Matlock, Appellants. (Two Cases) Nos. 84-1416, 85-1119. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 11, 1985.Decided Oct. 9, 1986.Rehearin

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.S. ) No. ED111500 ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis ) Cause No. 2222-JU00514

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2024 Term June 6, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF A

OPINION Opinion by Justice Boatright This is a dispute about promotions in the City of Garland (“City”) fire department. The City sued appellant Randy E. Smith and many other City fire fighters, including the people who are now appellees in this case. The City voluntarily; dismissed Smith from the suit, but-he later intervened, suing the City and the fire fighters who the City had not dismis

419 B.R. 221 (2009) In re CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, et al., Debtors. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Plaintiff, v. Charter Communications Operating, LLC and CCO Holdings, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-11435 (JMP). Adversary No. 09-01132 (JMP). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. November 17, 2009. *2

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED108253 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Washington County vs. )

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED107031 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Loui

16 Cal.App.4th 919 (1993) 20 Cal. Rptr.2d 834 HEIDE V. BETZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHARLES J. PANKOW, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. A052194. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. June 18, 1993. *921 COUNSEL Margolin, Arguimbau & Battson, Ephraim Margolin, De

IN THE FILED Indiana Supreme Court Sep 15 2025, 11:54 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

145 F.Supp.2d 614 (2001) Kurt OSTRANDER, Plaintiff v. Martin F. HORN, et al., Defendants No. CIV. A. 3:00-1606. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 11, 2001. *615 *616 Kurt Ostrander, Waynesburg, PA, Pro se. Peter Hobart, Camp Hill, PA, for Defendant. <

[Cite as Wood v. MAK Invest. Properties, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-4485.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JASON WOOD, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 113228 v. : MAK INVESTMENT PROPER

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ZACHARY ROSENBAUM, No. 22-16863 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:20-cv- v. 04777-NC CITY OF SAN JOSE; BRET HATZENBUHLER, SAN JOSE OPINION POLICE DEPARTMENT SERGEANT; HYMEL DUNN, RYAN FERGUSON, FRANCISCO VALLEJO, GARY ANDERSON, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, Defendants-Appellants,

[Cite as In re A.W., 2022-Ohio-1097.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO. 2021-A-0025 A.W., ABUSED CHILD Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Divis

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr,, Judge Introduction . Samuel Spires (Spires) appeals from the judgment and sentence upon his conviction following a jury trial of three counts of unlawful possession of a concealable firearm, Section 571.070, RSMo. (Cum.Supp. 2010). Spires argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence and in adm

FILED IN THE May 09 2024, 10:01 am Indiana Supreme Court CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case is whether Plaintiff-appellee Donald Dean Walker’s (Debtor) individual retirement annuities (IRA’s) and Keogh annuities should be included as property of his bankruptcy estate, and, if included, whether the annuities are subject to exemption from the estate pursuant to the relevant Oklahoma exemption statutes.

OPINION SMITH, TRACY M., Judge In these consolidated appeals, appellant Tramayne Colfred Williams challenges the decisions of two district courts,1 in separate proceedings in Hennepin County and Otter Tail County, to deny his motions to correct sentence under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9. At the crux of the appeals is Williams’s argument that the sentencing courts improper

FILED Jun 23 2025, 1:37 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Indian

[Cite as Cuckler v. Admr. Bur. of Workers' Comp., 2017-Ohio-1469.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY MARY L. CUCKLER, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case N

IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Court Case No. 25S-MI-101 Family & Social Services Administration FILED Appellant (Defendant below) Apr 23 2025, 1:21 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court –v– Court of Appeals