Cases

ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Three separate but related class actions are before the court. They are brought by consumers who purchased moist toilet wipes sold by retailer defendants, produced by manufacturer defendants, and marked “flush-able.” Alleged are defects in labeling. Plaintiffs seek money damages and injunctive relief because they claim the product is not “flushab

MEMORANDUM & ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS ACTIONS Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 492 A. General Theory ... 492 B. Original Cases ... 493 II. Procedural Background ... 496 A. Overview of Cases ... 496 B. Motion to Dismiss for Lack

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge In October 2015, this court stayed class certification in the above-captioned cases and referred the critical issue of an appropriate definition of “flushable” wipes and related matters to the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). See Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co., 311 F.R.D. 29 (E.D.N.Y.2015), reconsideration de

24-425 (L) Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit 3 _________________ 4 5 August Term 2024 6 7 Argued: March 19, 2025 8 Decided: July 1, 2025 9 10 Nos. 24-425

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Kimberly-Clark Mill, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1371 C.D. 2024 : Argued: June 3, 2025 William Moss, Jr. (Workers’ : Compensation Appeal Board), : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE ANNE E. COVEY, Judge HONORABLE LORI A. DUMAS, Judg

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 1, 2019 Decided October 1, 2019 No. 18-1051 MOZILLA CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 18-

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARY BETH MONTERA, Nos. 22-16375 individually and on behalf of all others 22-16622 similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:16-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant / 06980-RS Cross-Appellee, v. OPINION PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION, FKA Joint Juice, Inc.,

ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction Five separate but related class actions are before the court. They are brought by consumers who purchased moist toilet wipes sold by retailer defendants, produced by manufacturer defendants, and marked “flushable.” Alleged are defects in labeling. Plaintiffs seek money damages and injunctive relief because th

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge *822This is a class action lawsuit that is part of the litigation collectively referred to as the Flint Water Cases. To those following these cases, the facts are by now well known. Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Flint, Michigan, were exposed to lead, legionella, and other contaminants within the municipal wate

OSCN Found Document:Haddan et al. vs The Coves Master Association, Inc. et al. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case

496 F.3d 645 (2007) Donna L. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO and Terence Williams,[1] Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-2302. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 6, 2007. Decided July 26, 2007. *646 *647

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-1031 ____________ QING QIN, Appellant v. VERTEX, INC. ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge Since the Continental Congress met in 1774, the States' representatives to the federal government have employed, and paid, clergy who perform as chaplains and offer a daily prayer before each session begins. Daniel Barker, an atheist and co-President of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, challenges the modern practice in the House of Representatives, whereby he was denied the oppo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction. 243 II. Procedural Background.244 III. Standard for Motion for Reconsideration.244 IV. Discussion. 245 A. Stay of class certification and referral to the FTC.245

HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR., Chief Judge *542INTRODUCTION Plaintiff brings this putative class action alleging that Defendant McCormick & Company, Inc. deceptively marketed certain products as "natural." The Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserts claims for unjust enrichment under New York Common Law and Maryland Common Law, violation

700 F.Supp.2d 962 (2010) Norman P. LUPESCU, Plaintiff, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration, Defendant. Case No. 07 C 4821. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 19, 2010. *966 Dana L. Kurtz, Heidi Karr Sleper, Kurtz La

391 F.Supp.2d 707 (2005) Sharifah SCOTT-RILEY, Plaintiff, v. MULLINS FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., and William Mullins, Defendants. No. 04 C 1368. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 3, 2005. *708 *709 *710

OPINION SERNA, Justice. {1} “There is nothing which so generally strikes the imagination, and engages the affections of mankind, as the right of property.” 2 William Blaclcstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 2 (Univ. of Chicago Press ed. 1979) (1766). The property that has captured the affections of

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Plaintiffs Jennifer O'Neill ("O'Neill") and Tricia Zamfino ("Zamfino") bring the instant Complaint, on their own behalf and on behalf of a putative class, alleging that they were injured by paying for unsafe products that have since been voluntarily removed from the marketplace by Defendants Standard Homeopathic Company ("Standard") and Hyland's, Inc. ("Hyland's"), and which are no longer available