Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “L.C. v. TRUMP”
L.C. v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) L.C., a minor child, by and through ) her father MASSIMILIANO CALI, ) ) MASSIMILIANO CALI, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Ca
L.C. v. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) L.C., a minor child, by and through ) her father MASSIMILIANO CALI, ) ) MASSIMILIANO CALI, ) ) Plaintiffs,
STEVENSON, J. Trump International Golf Club, L.C. (“the Club”) challenges a final judgment requiring that it return a $200,000 membership deposit to member Harry Theodo-racopulos. The return of the deposit was predicated upon the lower court’s finding that the Club had effectively expelled Theodoracopulos. As this finding is not supported by the evidence, we are compelled to reverse. To join the Club, The
Ali v. Trumppublic domain
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Petitioner Abdul Razak Ali ("Ali" or "petitioner") challenges his continued detention at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where he has been held since June 2002. Although this Court, Ali v. Obama , 741 F.Supp.2d 19 (D.D.C. 2011), and our Cou
Stone v. Trumppublic domain
A. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order 1. Standard of Review Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a district court "must consider timely objections" to a USMJ's order on nondispositive, pretrial matters and "modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." "The 'clearly erroneous' standard applies to factu
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." A formal Presidential Memorandum followed on August 25, 2017. Before the 2017 Presidential Memorandum, the Department of Defense had announced that openly transgende
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge *540On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." This lawsuit followed. On October 30, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary injunction, the effect
Xtreme Limo, L.L.C. v. Antillpublic domain
[Cite as Xtreme Limo, L.L.C. v. Antill, 2020-Ohio-4314.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Xtreme Limo, LLC, et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : No. 19AP-799 v. : (C.P.C. No. 16CV-11502) Shawn M. Antill,
Lovitky v. Trumppublic domain
An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 30, 2017) COLLEEN KÓLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge . On July 26, 2017, President Donald, J. Trump,issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capa
James Benjamin, Inc. v. Trump CPS, L. L. C.public domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered January 31, 2001, which granted defendants’ motion to strike the jury demand by plaintiffs and third-party defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion denied and the jury demand reinstated. This is an action to replevy personal property levied upon by defendants, and for damages for conversion of said property. Defendants’ motion to strike plainti
Sierra Club v. Trumppublic domain
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge On February 19, 2019, Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition ("SBCC") (collectively, "Citizen Group Plaintiffs" or "Citizen Groups") filed suit against Defendants Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States; Patrick M. Shanahan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense; Kevin K. McAleenan, in his official capacity as
Dist. of Columbia v. Trumppublic domain
PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Procedural Background In a previous Opinion, the Court held that the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland have standing to challenge, in his official capacity, President Donald J. Trump based on his alleged violations of the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.1 The Court found that
Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPpublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *2026Over the course of five days in April 2019, three committees of the U. S. House of Representatives issued four subpoenas seeking information about the finances of President Donald J. Trump, his children, and affiliated businesses. We have held that the House has authority under
CASA De Md., Inc. v. Trumppublic domain
GEORGE J. HAZEL, United States District Judge On March 1, 2001, after a devastating earthquake that killed 1,100 people and displaced another 1.3 million, the Bush Administration designated El Salvador for "Temporary Protected Status," (TPS), a status that permits eligible nationals living in the United States at the time of the designation to lawfully remain here and work for as long as the designation remains in place.
Dist. of Columbia v. Trumppublic domain
PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In a previous Opinion1 the Court held that Plaintiffs, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, have standing to challenge actions of President Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity,2 that they believe violate the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.3 <
E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trumppublic domain
Because the Court's temporary restraining order concluded that the Immigration Organizations had established serious questions going to the merits of their notice-and-comment claims, ECF No. 43 at 27-29, it follows that Defendants also have shown serious questions going to the merits. Cf. Leiva-Perez , 640 F.3d at 970 (expla
Dist. of Columbia v. Trumppublic domain
PETER J. MESSITTE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *732This suit alleges that President Donald J. Trump has violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.1 Plaintiffs, the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, submit that the President is violating these Clauses because the Tru
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trumppublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge On March 6, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order which bars, with certain exceptions, the entry to the United States of nationals of six predominantly Muslim countries, suspends the entry of refugees for 120 days, and cuts by more than half the number of refugees to be admitted to the United States in the current year
International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trumppublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge For the third time this year, President Donald J. Trump has issued an order banning the entry into the United States, with some exceptions, of nationals of multiple predominantly Muslim nations. At issue is whether this latest travel, ban should be enjoined by this Court because'it is the latest incarnatio