Cases

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This government contract case, before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, involves a series of claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978(CDA) (41 U.S.C. § 609(a)). Plaintiff alleges that no less than twelve contracts arose out of two Indefinite Quantity Contracts (IQC), under which defendant allegedly promised plaintiff work on various projects. Plaintiff alleges

ORDER ANNE C. CONWAY, District Judge. Plaintiffs Robert Parker and Thomas Scheer, qui tam relators (“Relators”), bring this suit against Defendants Space Coast Medical Associates, L.L.P., a group medical practice; its corporate partner, Brevard Hematology and Oncology Consultants-Levine, Zimm and Sprawls, M.D., P.A.1; and its radiation oncologist, Dr. Cynthia Jean

Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706; Bid Protest Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(B)(ii); Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), 48 C.F.R. § 8.4, Federal Supply Schedules, 48 C.F.R. § 8.405-3, Blanket Purchase Agreements; Federal Agency Procurement, 41 U.S.C. § 152(3); Interested Party, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Rules of the United States Court o

MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. In this long-running qui tarn action, plaintiff-relator Associates Against Outlier Fraud alleges that defendants Huron Consulting Group, Inc., Huron Consulting Group, LLC, and Huron Consulting Services, LLC (collectively, “Huron”), and defendants Empire Health Choice Assurance, Inc., and Empire Medicare Services (collectively, “Empire”) violate

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge. In this post-award bid protest, Ettefaq-Meliat-Hai-Afghan Consulting, Inc., (“EMA”) challenges the awards of multiple contracts by the Department of the Army, CENTCOM Contracting Command (“Army”) for trucking services in the Afghanistan Theater of Operations.2 The Army disqualified EMA from receiving an award on the ground that EMA was nonres

OPINION 1 BRENDAN LINEHAN SHANNON, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are motions to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to abstain (collectively, the “Motions to Dismiss”), filed by numerous named defendants herein who are producers of oil and gas (the “Producers”).2 The Producers are Samson Re

Boggs, Justice. **252This case presents the first opportunity for this Court to consider the effects of the General Assembly's wholesale revision in 2016 of the anti-SLAPP statute, OCGA § 9-11-11.1, which now substantially mirrors California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16. We vacate the trial court's denial of the defendants' anti-SLAPP motio

306 Ga. 252 FINAL COPY S19A0146. WILKES & McHUGH, P.A. et al. v. LTC CONSULTING, L.P. et al. BOGGS, Justice. This case presents the first opportunity for this Court to consider the effects of the General Assembly’s wholesale revision in 2016 of the anti-SLAPP statute, OCGA § 9-11-11.1, which now substantially mirrors California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16. We vacate the trial court’s denial of the defendants’ anti-SLAPP motion at issue in this cas

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 27, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A18A1155. WILKES & MCHUGH, P.A. et al. v. LTC CONSULTING, L.P. et al. The appellants, an out-of-state law firm and lawyer, appeal the superior court’s order denying their motion to dismiss or to strike the appellees’ complaint pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-11.1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 22-429 Filed: August 26, 2022 Re-issued: September 14, 20221 ________________________________________ ) LIGHTBOX PARENT, L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, )

REAVLEY,- Circuit Judge: This is a qui .tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, against National Heritage Insurance Company (“NHIC”), Deloitte & Touche, and Medicaid Claim Solutions of Texas (collectively, “Defendants”). Toni Barron and Vicky Scheel (“Relators”) assert that Defendants participated in the knowing submission to the United S

OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Judge. This post-award bid protest action comes before the court on defendant’s and intervenor’s motions to dismiss, as well as the parties’ cross motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, CHE Consulting, Inc. (CHE), protests the decision of Defense Information Technology Contracting Organization (DITCO) to issue orders pursuant to a Blanket Purchas

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1206 EVANGELINE J. PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REEMA CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. ---------------------------------------------------- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; NAT

In the United States Court of Federal Claims SALIENSE CONSULTING LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, No. 25-624 Defendant, (Filed: June 23, 2025) 1 and DELVIOM LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. John Edward McCarthy, Jr., Zachary H. Schroeder, and Issac D. Schabes, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff.

[Cite as G.P. v. L.P., 2022-Ohio-1373.] COURT OF APPEALS MORROW COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT G.P. : JUDGES: : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J. : Hon. Pat

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the rights, duties, and liabilities of the parties pursuant to a construction contract and a policy of insurance, the defendant International Management Consultants, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered March 10, 1997, as denied its cross motion to resettle an order of the same court (Murphy, J.), entered August 1

SUMMARY ORDER Reino de España (“Spain”) sued defendants ABSG Consulting, Inc., et al. (“ABS”) under American general maritime and Spanish law for damages resulting from the M.T. Prestige oil spill. Spain now appeals an award of summary judgment based on the district court’s ruling that the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 973 U.N.T.S. 3, Nov. 29, 1969, as amended, 1956 U.N.T.S. 255,

SUMMARY ORDER Reino de España (“Spain”) sued defendants ABSG Consulting, Inc., et al. (“ABS”) under American general maritime and Spanish law for damages resulting from the M.T. Prestige oil spill. Spain now appeals an award of summary judgment based on the district court’s ruling that the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 973 U.N.T.S. 3, Nov. 29, 1969, as amended, 1956 U.N.T.S. 255,

557 F.3d 772 (2009) Hilda L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee, and CONSULTING FIDUCIARIES, INCORPORATED, Appellee, v. Current Development Corporation and George P. Klein, Jr., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-1228, 08-2254. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 1, 2008. Decided March 5