Cases

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES, District Judge. In this patent infringement action, following a so-called Markman proceeding, I construe as a matter of law the disputed claims of the subject patent. I The patent at the center of this dispute, U.S. Patent No. 7,277,294 (“the '294 patent”) is entitled “Contactor Draw Out Tray” and owned by the plaintiff, Electro

795 F.Supp.2d 1345 (2011) In re DENTURE CREAM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to Case No. 9:09-CV-80625-CMA (Chapman, et al. v. Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC). Case No. 09-2051-MD. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. June 13, 2011. *1347 ORDER CECILIA M. A

JORDAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The federal filed rate doctrine, a creature of federal common law derived from various federal statutes, has been around since 1907. Despite its existence for over 100 years, Pennsylvania and Florida have so far not adopted it. The majority, without seeking guidance from the supreme courts of Pennsylvania or Florida, now confidently decrees that the federal filed

642 F.3d 1355 (2011) WELLMAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2010-1249. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 29, 2011. *1356 Barbara L. Moore, Edward Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP, of Stamford, CT, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief was Scott D.

FILED 15-0975 12/21/2015 7:10:33 PM tex-8333751 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, C

SACK, Circuit Judge: The question presented to us on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs are bound to arbitrate their dispute with the defendants as a consequence of an arbitration provision that the defendants assert was *113 part of a contract between the parties. Neither of the plaintiffs ackno

111 F.Supp.2d 649 (2000) VISUAL SECURITY CONCEPTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. KTV, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.98-4921. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 5, 2000. *650 Gavin P. Lentz, Stephen E. Skovron, Bochetto & Lentz, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Neil A. Morris, Neal A. Morris Associates, P.C., Philad

679 S.E.2d 223 (2008) Hugh M. CAPERTON, Harman Development Corporation, Harman Mining Corporation, and Sovereign Coal Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., Elk Run Coal Company, Inc., Independence Coal Company, Inc., Marfork Coal Company, Inc., Performance Coal Company, and Massey Coal Sales Company, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellants. No. 33350. Supreme Court of

391 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2005) HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., Hynix Semiconductor America Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Infineon Technologies, North America Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc., Defendant — Intervenors. Slip Op. 05-106, Court No. 03-00651. United States Court of International Trade. August 26, 2005. *1338

Opinion Musgrave, Judge: In this action, plaintiffs Ausimont SpA and Ausi-mont USA (collectively “Ausimont”) have contested the final affirmative anti-circumvention determination by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA” the “Department” or “Commerce”): Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy; Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of Antidu

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: For ninety years, it has been settled law that garbage collection and disposal is a core function of local government in the United States. At their option, cities may provide garbage pick-up to their citizens directly (that is, through town employees or an independent contractor), or they may rely on a closely regulated private market to provide those services. In 1905, the Supreme Court t

744 F.Supp. 1259 (1990) WEIGHT WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. The STOUFFER CORPORATION, Stouffer Foods Corporation and Nestle Enterprises, Defendants. STOUFFER FOODS CORPORATION, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. WEIGHT WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., H.J. Heinz Company and Foodways National, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants. No. 88 Civ. 7062 (MBM). United States District Court, S.D. New Y

66 F.3d 1272 41 ERC 1254, 64 USLW 2186, 25 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,522 USA RECYCLING, INC.; Friendly Carting, Inc.; JosephCarione; Angelo Carione; Jean I. Carione; LouisCarione; and Carl R. Fucci, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.TOWN OF BABYLON; Town of Babylon, New York, CommercialGarbage District No. 2; Town Board of the Town of Babylon;Richard H. Schaffer, Supervisor; Francine V. Brown,Counci

OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, United'States District Judge First Mercury moves for partial summary judgment' on the basis that it has no responsibility for ZellComp’s liability. Westchester has joined in First Mercury’s motion. AIG, an intervener in the action, moved similarly for summary judgment and a declaration that it has no requirement to indemnify Multnomah County. Multnomah County moved for Summary Ju

MARKMAN OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Senju Pharmaceútical Co., Ltd., Bausch & Lomb Inc., and Bausch & Lomb Pharma Holdings Corp. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought these various patent infringement actions under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, against Defendants Lupin, Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Innopharma Licensing, Inc., Inn

*1347 ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, the Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC’s (“Procter & Gamble[’s]”) motions to exclude all or part of the testimony of seven of Plaintiff, Marianne Chapmans’ expert witnesses. (See [ECF Nos. 1040-1044]). The proposed

Claim Construction Opinion & Order SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. Table of Contents I. General Legal Standard...................................................425 II. The Abuse-Proof Patents.................................................425 *424A. Background........................

376 F.Supp.2d 251 (2005) The BEACON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ONEBEACON INSURANCE CORP., Defendant. No. C.A.01-354S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. July 15, 2005. *252 *253 *254 Michael A. Gamboli, Robert K. Taylor, Steven E. S

OPINION RlDGWAY, Judge: In this action, plaintiff Celanese Chemicals Ltd. contests the negative preliminary determination reached by the U.S. International Trade Commission in an antidumping duty investigation of polyvinyl alcohol imports from Taiwan. See Polyvinyl Alcohol From Taiwan, 69 Fed. Reg. 63,177 (Oct. 29, 2004) (not

815 F.Supp.2d 448 (2011) In re PUERTO RICAN CABOTAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. MDL No. 3:08-md-1960 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 13, 2011. *450 H. Laddie Montague, Jr., Ruthanne Gordon, Berger & Montague, PC, Philadelphia, PA, Maria D. Bertolez-Elvira, Nestor Mendez-Gomez, Pietrantoni Mendoz & Alvare