Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LAWRENCE EDWARD FRATES”
Frates v. Edward D. Jones & Co.public domain
760 P.2d 748 (1988) Onata FRATES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., a limited partnership, Lawrence Sobol its general partner and Larry Richardson, Defendants and Appellants. No. 88-120. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs July 14, 1988. Decided August 23, 1988. *749 Moulton, Belli
MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo Countypublic domain
477 U.S. 340 (1986) MACDONALD, SOMMER & FRATES v. COUNTY OF YOLO ET AL. No. 84-2015. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 26, 1986 Decided June 25, 1986 APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT Howard N. Ellman argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Gus Bauman, Kenneth N. Burn
84 B.R. 202 (1988) In re KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Debtor. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Monty H. RIAL, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1552 E, Adv. Nos. 87 E 135, 87 E 437. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. March 28, 1988.
80 B.R. 216 (1987) In re KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Debtor. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1553 E, Adv. No. 87 E 135. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. November 24, 1987. *217 Edward M. Glennon, John T. Connelly, Lawrence R. Waldock, James P. McCarth
Albright v. Edward D. Jones & Co.public domain
571 N.E.2d 1329 (1991) Thurman D. ALBRIGHT, et al., Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., Appellee (Defendant below). No. 25A03-9011-CV-496. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. May 30, 1991. *1330 Donald J. Tribbett, Scott L. Starr, Starr Austen & Tribbett, Logansport, for appellants. Jo
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hawespublic domain
52 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. RES
Mueske v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE WEBER delivered the Opinion of the Court. Defendant, Piper, Jafiray & Hopwood, Incorporated (Piper, Jafiray & Hopwood), appeals the Order of the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County, which denied its Motion to Compel Arbitration in an action brought by plaintiff alleging negligence and violations of the Montana Securitie
R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of Anchoragepublic domain
34 P.3d 289 (2001) R & Y, INC., and Josef Ressel, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. S-9315, S-9435. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 7, 2001. *290 Lawrence V. Albert, Anchorage, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Steven S. Tervooren, Hughes Thorsness Powell Huddlest
In The Matter Of Pioneer Book Publishers, Inc.public domain
446 F.2d 891 In the Matter of PIONEER BOOK PUBLISHERS, INC., Bankrupt.John NICHOLAS, Trustee, Appellant,v.PUBLISHERS COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., etc., the Miami National Bank, etc., Appellee. No. 71-1639 Summary Calendar.* United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 7, 1971. Reh
446 F.2d 891 In the Matter ofPIONEER BOOK PUBLISHERS, INC., Bankrupt.John NICHOLAS, Trustee, Appellant,v.PUBLISHERS COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., etc., the MiamiNational Bank, etc., Appellee.No. 71-1639 Summary Calendar.**Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.v.Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Robert Murphy v. New Milford Zoning Commissionpublic domain
402 F.3d 342 Robert MURPHY and Mary Murphy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NEW MILFORD ZONING COMMISSION, George Doring, C. Brooks Temple, Charles Raymond, Lawrence Greenspan, Eleanor Florio, Patricia McRae, Mona Tito and Kathy Castagnetta, Defendants-Appellants,United States of America, Intervenor-Defendant,Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Amicus Curiae. Docket No. 03-9329. United States
Murphy v. New Milford Zoning Commissionpublic domain
MESKILL, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an action commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Fitz-simmons, M.J., by Robert and Mary Murphy against the New Milford Zoning Commission, its individual members and the New Milford Zoning Enforcement Officer (collectively, “New Milford”). Following complaints of large, weekly gatherings at the Murphys’ home and an investigation o
Haden v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)public domain
100 B.R. 973 (1989) In re Charles Pender EDWARDS, III, C.P. "Bud" Edwards, "Bud" Edwards, Debtor. Charlyne E. HADEN, Plaintiff, v. C.P. EDWARDS, III and Fifth Third Bank, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 3-88-00621, Adv. No. 3-89-0036. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. June 15, 1989. *974 Miller & Martin, Raymond
W. Birkenfeld Trust v. Baileypublic domain
827 F.Supp. 651 (1993) The W. BIRKENFELD TRUST, a Washington Trust, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barbara BAILEY; et al., Defendants. No. CY-92-3062-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. May 27, 1993. *652 *653 Michael Haglund, Haglund & Kirtley, Portland, OR, for plaintiffs.
Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHENpublic domain
404 Mass. 419 (1989) 535 N.E.2d 1255 JAMES F. MEEHAN & another[1] vs. MAURICE F. SHAUGHNESSY & others;[2] CYNTHIA J. COHEN & others,[3] third-party defendants. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 6, 1988. March 28, 1989. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, LYNCH, &
United States v. Mitchellpublic domain
377 F.Supp. 1312 (1974) UNITED STATES of America v. John N. MITCHELL et al. Crim. No. 74-110. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 30, 1974. *1313 *1314 Leon Jaworski, Special Pros., Philip A. Lacovara, Counsel to the Special Prosecutor, Richard Ben-Veniste, Sidney M. Glaz
Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Crosspublic domain
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: This important Florida diversity case involves an appeal from-a judgment for damages for breach of contract in < favor of Eastern Air Lines against McDonnell Douglas Aircraft, Inc. based on a jury'verdict in Eastern’s favor for the sum of $24,552,-659.11 plus costs of $241,149.02 — one of the largest jury verdicts ever reviewed
United States v. Eppolitopublic domain
436 F.Supp.2d 532 (2006) UNITED STATES v. Louis EPPOLITO and Stephen Caracappa. No. 05-CR-192. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 30, 2006. *533 *534 *535 *536 *537 Dan
Consolidated Waste Systems, LLC v. Metro Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 7, 2003 Session CONSOLIDATED WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC v. METRO GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C895 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge No. M2002-02582-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 30, 2005 A would-be developer of a construc
United States v. Haldemanpublic domain
Opinion for the court per curiam. *274Dissenting opinion filed by MacKINNON, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:1 On March 1, 1974 a grand jury in Washington, D. C. returned a 13-count indictment against seven individuals. It charged what amounted to an unprecedented scandal