⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “LAWRENCE EDWARD FRATES”

Montana Supreme Court · 1988-08-23 · Published · cited 4× · 760 P.2d 748; 233 Mont. 377; 1988 Mont. LEXIS 256
760 P.2d 748 (1988) Onata FRATES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., a limited partnership, Lawrence Sobol its general partner and Larry Richardson, Defendants and Appellants. No. 88-120. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs July 14, 1988. Decided August 23, 1988. *749 Moulton, Belli
Supreme Court of the United States · 1986-09-03 · Published · cited 566× · 91 L. Ed. 2d 285; 106 S. Ct. 2561; 477 U.S. 340; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 119
477 U.S. 340 (1986) MACDONALD, SOMMER & FRATES v. COUNTY OF YOLO ET AL. No. 84-2015. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 26, 1986 Decided June 25, 1986 APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT Howard N. Ellman argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Gus Bauman, Kenneth N. Burn
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988-03-28 · Published · cited 4× · 84 B.R. 202; 5 Bankr. Ct. Rep. 161; 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 397; 1988 WL 25686
84 B.R. 202 (1988) In re KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Debtor. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Monty H. RIAL, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1552 E, Adv. Nos. 87 E 135, 87 E 437. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. March 28, 1988.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987-11-24 · Published · cited 2× · 80 B.R. 216; 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1849; 16 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1092; 1987 WL 4453
80 B.R. 216 (1987) In re KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Debtor. KAISER STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Joseph A. FRATES, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 87 B 1553 E, Adv. No. 87 E 135. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. November 24, 1987. *217 Edward M. Glennon, John T. Connelly, Lawrence R. Waldock, James P. McCarth
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991-05-30 · Published · cited 10× · 571 N.E.2d 1329; 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 905; 1991 WL 90299
571 N.E.2d 1329 (1991) Thurman D. ALBRIGHT, et al., Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., Appellee (Defendant below). No. 25A03-9011-CV-496. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. May 30, 1991. *1330 Donald J. Tribbett, Scott L. Starr, Starr Austen & Tribbett, Logansport, for appellants. Jo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 52 F.3d 338; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18242; 1995 WL 225235
52 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. RES
Montana Supreme Court · 1993-08-27 · Published · cited 14× · 859 P.2d 444; 260 Mont. 207; 50 State Rptr. 1009; 1993 Mont. LEXIS 276
JUSTICE WEBER delivered the Opinion of the Court. Defendant, Piper, Jafiray & Hopwood, Incorporated (Piper, Jafiray & Hopwood), appeals the Order of the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County, which denied its Motion to Compel Arbitration in an action brought by plaintiff alleging negligence and violations of the Montana Securitie
Alaska Supreme Court · 2001-09-07 · Published · cited 21× · 34 P.3d 289; 2001 Alas. LEXIS 122; 2001 WL 1021108
34 P.3d 289 (2001) R & Y, INC., and Josef Ressel, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. S-9315, S-9435. Supreme Court of Alaska. September 7, 2001. *290 Lawrence V. Albert, Anchorage, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Steven S. Tervooren, Hughes Thorsness Powell Huddlest
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 446 F.2d 891
446 F.2d 891 In the Matter of PIONEER BOOK PUBLISHERS, INC., Bankrupt.John NICHOLAS, Trustee, Appellant,v.PUBLISHERS COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., etc., the Miami National Bank, etc., Appellee. No. 71-1639 Summary Calendar.* United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 7, 1971. Reh
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 446 F.2d 891
446 F.2d 891 In the Matter ofPIONEER BOOK PUBLISHERS, INC., Bankrupt.John NICHOLAS, Trustee, Appellant,v.PUBLISHERS COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., etc., the MiamiNational Bank, etc., Appellee.No. 71-1639 Summary Calendar.**Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.v.Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409, Part I. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-03-25 · Published · cited 71× · 402 F.3d 342; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4843
402 F.3d 342 Robert MURPHY and Mary Murphy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NEW MILFORD ZONING COMMISSION, George Doring, C. Brooks Temple, Charles Raymond, Lawrence Greenspan, Eleanor Florio, Patricia McRae, Mona Tito and Kathy Castagnetta, Defendants-Appellants,United States of America, Intervenor-Defendant,Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Amicus Curiae. Docket No. 03-9329. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-03-25 · Published · cited 8× · 402 F.3d 342
MESKILL, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an action commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Fitz-simmons, M.J., by Robert and Mary Murphy against the New Milford Zoning Commission, its individual members and the New Milford Zoning Enforcement Officer (collectively, “New Milford”). Following complaints of large, weekly gatherings at the Murphys’ home and an investigation o
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989-06-15 · Published · cited 8× · 100 B.R. 973; 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 942; 1989 WL 64461
100 B.R. 973 (1989) In re Charles Pender EDWARDS, III, C.P. "Bud" Edwards, "Bud" Edwards, Debtor. Charlyne E. HADEN, Plaintiff, v. C.P. EDWARDS, III and Fifth Third Bank, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 3-88-00621, Adv. No. 3-89-0036. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. June 15, 1989. *974 Miller & Martin, Raymond
District Court, E.D. Washington · 1993-05-27 · Published · cited 2× · 827 F. Supp. 651; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14336; 1993 WL 275877
827 F.Supp. 651 (1993) The W. BIRKENFELD TRUST, a Washington Trust, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barbara BAILEY; et al., Defendants. No. CY-92-3062-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. May 27, 1993. *652 *653 Michael Haglund, Haglund & Kirtley, Portland, OR, for plaintiffs.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989-03-28 · Published · cited 116× · 535 N.E.2d 1255; 404 Mass. 419
404 Mass. 419 (1989) 535 N.E.2d 1255 JAMES F. MEEHAN & another[1] vs. MAURICE F. SHAUGHNESSY & others;[2] CYNTHIA J. COHEN & others,[3] third-party defendants. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 6, 1988. March 28, 1989. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, LYNCH, &
District Court, District of Columbia · 1974-04-30 · Published · cited 53× · 377 F. Supp. 1312; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8750
377 F.Supp. 1312 (1974) UNITED STATES of America v. John N. MITCHELL et al. Crim. No. 74-110. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 30, 1974. *1313 *1314 Leon Jaworski, Special Pros., Philip A. Lacovara, Counsel to the Special Prosecutor, Richard Ben-Veniste, Sidney M. Glaz
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976-05-17 · Published · cited 147× · 532 F.2d 957; 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 353; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11306
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge: This important Florida diversity case involves an appeal from-a judgment for damages for breach of contract in < favor of Eastern Air Lines against McDonnell Douglas Aircraft, Inc. based on a jury'verdict in Eastern’s favor for the sum of $24,552,-659.11 plus costs of $241,149.02 — one of the largest jury verdicts ever reviewed
District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-06-30 · Published · cited 9× · 436 F. Supp. 2d 532; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48076; 2006 WL 1793536
436 F.Supp.2d 532 (2006) UNITED STATES v. Louis EPPOLITO and Stephen Caracappa. No. 05-CR-192. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 30, 2006. *533 *534 *535 *536 *537 Dan
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 7, 2003 Session CONSOLIDATED WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC v. METRO GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C895 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge No. M2002-02582-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 30, 2005 A would-be developer of a construc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976-10-12 · Published · cited 662× · 181 U.S. App. D.C. 254; 559 F.2d 31; 1 Fed. R. Serv. 1203; 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6741
Opinion for the court per curiam. *274Dissenting opinion filed by MacKINNON, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:1 On March 1, 1974 a grand jury in Washington, D. C. returned a 13-count indictment against seven individuals. It charged what amounted to an unprecedented scandal