Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII EL PUEBLO DE Apelación PUERTO RICO procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala de Guaynabo V.

*359 OPINION AND ORDER MILDRED CABAN FLORES, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the court is the central issue of whether defendant Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (hereinafter “BPPR”) holds a valid mortgage on plaintiff Leandro Rafael Rodriguez Ramos and Nelimar Reyes Torres’ real property under Puerto Rico’s “Act to Streamline the Property Registry” e

PER CURIAM. In June 2001, Jovita Menendez, an account manager at Scotiabank of Puerto Rico, applied for a posted job as senior account manager. On June 22, the job went instead to Francisco Vazquez, whose rank (branch manager) was higher than that of Menendez and just below senior account manager. Vazquez was a male aged 35; Menendez was then 54 years old.

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO El Pueblo de Puerto Rico Recurrido Certiorari v. 2003 TSPR 52 Leandro Ruiz Martínez 158 DPR ____ Peticionario Número del Caso: CC-2002-35 Fecha: 8 de abril de 2003 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones: Circuito Regional V Juez Ponente: Hon. German J. Brau Ramírez

Mr. Justice Todd, Jr., delivered the opinion of the court. Petitioners in this case deducted from their gross income in their tax returns for 1937, the proportional part of the loss sustained by each of them by reason of the destruction of a ruinous building belonging to them, the total amount of the loss being $11,550.71. This deduction was made pursuant to a letter of November 18, 1937, received by Dr. L. Ló

El Juez Asociado Señor Todd, Jr., emitió la opinión del tribunal. Los peticionarios en este caso dedujeron de sus ingresos brutos, en sus planillas correspondientes al año contributivo 1937, la parte proporcional de la pérdida sufrida por cada uno de ellos con motivo de la demolición de un edificio rui-noso de su propiedad, siendo el valor total de dicha pérdida la. suma de $11,550.71. Dicha deducción fué hecha

PER CURIAM: I. BACKGROUND A Facts Investors in a series of Merrill Lynch real estate limited partnerships (“investors”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Michael B. Mukasey, Judge), entered August 26,1997, dismissing pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) their civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

per curiam: Nos corresponde resolver si las disposiciones de la Ley para la Prevención e Intervención con la Violen-cia Doméstica(1) (en adelante Ley Núm. 54) aplican a los actos de agresión que se susciten dentro de una relación de pareja de un mismo sexo. Por no encontrar en el historial legislativo del referido estatuto fundamento alguno que apunte a que así sea, y en atención al princ

400 F.Supp.2d 404 (2005) Ricardo RIVERA, Plaintiffs v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendants. No. CIV. 04-2350(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 29, 2005. *405 Marcos Valls-Sanchez, Cobian & Valls, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Lisa E. Bhatia-Gautier, United States Attorney's Office,

Mr. Justice Belaval delivered the opinion of the Court. Based on the premise that the two small islands “Hicacos” and “Ratones” were the property of Jhe Commonwealthof Puerto Rico, the petitioner filed a petition for condemnation, in the Eminent Domain Division of the Superior Court of Puerto Rico, of whatever rights the interveners could have and deposited the amount of two dollars as the reasonable value of t

BANKE, J., Concurring. I concur in the opinion and judgment and write separately to further discuss why I agree the government salary “noninterest” exception (Gov. Code, § 1091.5, subd. (a)(9)) provides an appropriate framework for analyzing the conflict of interest issues presented by this particular case. First, the history of the Eden Township Healthcare District (District), including the creation and ope

21-1083 United States v. Antonius IN THE United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM, 2022 ARGUED: FEBRUARY 23, 2023 DECIDED: JULY 10, 2023 No. 21-1083, 21-1409, 21-2082 UNITED STATES O

Mr. Justice Serrano Geyls delivered the opinion of the Court. On June 27, 1958 two warrants of arrest were issued by judicial authority against Maria Figueroa for two violations of the Beverage Act (13 L.P.R.A. § § 1574 and 1754). These warrants were based on two affidavits subscribed by Leandro López Torres, Internal Revenue officer, in which he stated that on April 30 and May 16, 1958 he had bought cane rum f

Opinion of Mr. Justice Hernández Matos, in which Mr. Chief Justice Negrón Fernández and Mr. Justice Santana Becerra concur, setting forth the grounds for . denying the motion for reconsideration. San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 27, 1969 Petitioner requested the reconsideration of our decision affirming the order of the Eminent Domain Division of the

El Juez Asociado Señor Serrano Geyls emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El día 27 de junio de 1958 se expidieron por autoridad judicial dos órdenes de arresto contra la Sra. María Figueroa por dos infracciones a la Ley de Bebidas (13 L.P.R.A. sees. 1574 y 1754). Tales órdenes se fundaron en dos declaracio-nes juradas suscritas por el Sr. Leandro López Torres, agente de rentas internas, quien en ellas afirmaba que

Opinión del Juez Asociado Señor Hernández Matos expo-niendo los criterios en que funda su voto de no ha lugar a la moción de reconsideración, en la cual concurren el Juez Presidente Señor Negrón Fernández y el Juez Aso-ciado Señor Santana Becerra. San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 27 de junio de 1969 El peticionario solicitó la reconsideración de nuestra de

ORDER LYNCH, District Judge. This case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for reinstatement of his *771eighth claim for relief. Plaintiff’s motion is denied for the reasons stated below. FACTS Plaintiff is a resident of the City of Burlingame and an amateur or “ham” radio operator licensed by the Federal Communications Com

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: Vernon Howard, a federally licensed amateur or “ham” radio enthusiast, was denied permission to construct a 51-foot radio antenna in his back yard, and filed suit against the City. The district court found that the Federal Communications Commission (“F.C.C.”) had partially preempted the City’s zoning powers, and ordered the City to reconsider the application. A

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN GLEESON, District Judge: This is a civil action brought by insurance companies who allege that defendants have engaged in sophisticated and related schemes to fraudulently obtain insurance proceeds that were supposed to pay for medical services for people injured in automobile accidents. Plaintiffs Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property

500 F.Supp.2d 197 (2007) Victor J. DEFAZIO, Jack Finkelstein, James Collins, and Henry Gebhard, Plaintiffs, v. Kevin WALLIS; Robert Aquino; Ryan P. Greenberg; Thomas Ryan; Bryan Zwolack; Jeffrey M. Roberts P.C.; Jeffrey M. Roberts; Capital Health Management, Inc.; Meridian Ambulance Group, LLC; Meridian Behavioral Sciences, LLP; Meridian Group Holdings, LLC; Meridian Behavioral Health Sciences, LLP; Meridian MSO, Inc.; Meridian MSO, LLC; Phoenix