⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “LEE v. NJ TRANSIT”

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2022-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2598-21 IN THE MATTER OF NJ TRANSIT AWARD OF APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION CONTRACTS NO. 21-048A and NO. 21-048B TO July 29, 2022 ORANGE, NEWARK, APPELLATE DIVISION ELIZABETH BUS, INC.,
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Anasia Maison v. New Jersey Transit Corporation (A-34/35-19) (083484) Argued September 29, 2020 -- Decided February 17, 2021 ALBIN, J., writing for the Court. In
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997-02-20 · Published · cited 7× · 957 F. Supp. 1391; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3643; 1997 WL 141850
957 F.Supp. 1391 (1997) Frances LEE-PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 94-5355 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 20, 1997. *1392 Arthur N. Martin, Jr., Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff. Peter Verniero, Attorney General, Robert A. Shire,
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court. In the interest of brevity, portions of an opinion may not have been summarized. Anasia Maison v. New Jersey Transit Corporation (A-34/35-19) (083484) Argued September 29, 2020 -- Decided February 17, 2021 ALBIN, J., writing for the Court. In
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-22-2008 CBS Outdoor Inc v. NJ Transit Corp Precedenti
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3737-17T2 ANASIA MAISON, Plaintiff-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION v. July 17, 2019 APPELLATE DIVISION NJ TRANSIT CORPORATION and KELVIN
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010-10-19 · Published · cited 0× · 746 F. Supp. 2d 642; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111909; 2010 WL 4193051
746 F.Supp.2d 642 (2010) GEOD CORPORATION, Christopher Emilius, John F. Emilius, Paul J. Emilius, Jr., and Stanley Palinski, Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-2425 (SDW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. October 19, 2010. *643 Robert D. Rosen, Rosen & Avigl
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009-08-20 · Published · cited 2× · 678 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74120; 2009 WL 2595607
678 F.Supp.2d 276 (2009) GEOD CORPORATION, Christopher Emilius, John F. Emilius, Paul J. Emilius, Jr., and Stanley Palinski, Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-2425 (SDW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 20, 2009. *278 Robert D. Rosen, Rosen & Avigliano,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003-07-29 · Published · cited 428× · 333 F.3d 74
JOSÉ CABRANES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass appeals from an April 19, 2001 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Nina Ger-shon, Judge), dismissing her claims of discrimination on the basis of sex and disability. The District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil
State v. Leepublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 7× · 532 P.3d 894; 371 Or. 200
200 June 29, 2023 No. 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. AARON CHRISTOPHER LEE, Petitioner on Review. (CC 18CR62116) (CA A171927) (SC S069654) On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted March 9, 2023, at University of Oregon School of Law
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Lee Marshall and Pamela Fuller : CASES CONSOLIDATED : v. : No. C.D. : Southeastern Pennsylvania : Transportation Authority, New Jersey : Transit and New Jersey Transit : Corporation : : Appeal of: New Jersey Tr
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005-04-15 · Published · cited 5× · 870 A.2d 745; 376 N.J. Super. 475
870 A.2d 745 (2005) 376 N.J. Super. 475 Charlotte SCHAEFER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Defendant-Appellant. Cynthia Lee, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Defendant-Appellant, and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Defendant-Respondent. Denise Sottilare, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cros
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008-02-29 · Published · cited 8× · 941 A.2d 622; 398 N.J. Super. 229
941 A.2d 622 (2008) 398 N.J. Super. 229 DUGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, Defendant-Respondent, and Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., and URS Corporation, Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 28, 2008. Decided February 29, 2008.
Michigan Supreme Court · 2024-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Elizabeth T. Clement Brian K. Zahra
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 17× · 314 F. Supp. 2d 362; 70 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1814; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6908; 2004 WL 859281
314 F.Supp.2d 362 (2004) MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Brett PRINCE, Defendant. Civ.A. No. 00-5354 (JLL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 30, 2004. *363 *364 George W. Wright, Narinder Parmer, George W. Wright & Associates, LLC., Hackensack, NJ, Mark Sableman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-12-22 · Published · cited 17× · 550 F.3d 302; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25818; 2008 WL 5303456
550 F.3d 302 (2008) CAROLE MEDIA LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION; All Vision LLC; Stuart Brooks, in his official capacity as Director of Outdoor Advertising for the New Jersey Department of Transportation. Carole Media, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company v. New Jersey Transit Corporation; All Vision LLC. Carole Media, LLC, Appellant. No. 07-3966.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992-06-29 · Published · cited 45× · 608 A.2d 254; 128 N.J. 376; 1992 N.J. LEXIS 390
The opinion of the Court was delivered by *379O’HERN, J. Once again we are required to resolve the proper relationship between the liability and immunity provisions of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 to :12-3. The facts of this case are set forth in the reported decision of the Appellate Division. 245 NJ.Super. 265,
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999-04-23 · Published · cited 12× · 47 F. Supp. 2d 523; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12231; 1999 WL 244256
47 F.Supp.2d 523 (1999) LITHUANIAN COMMERCE CORPORATION, LTD., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. SARA LEE HOSIERY, Sara Lee Hosiery International, Sara Lee International and Sara Lee Corporation, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Algis Vasys and Laima Zajanckauskiene, Additional Counterclaim Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-1949. United States District Court, D. New Jersey.</
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967-02-20 · Published · cited 67× · 227 A.2d 313; 48 N.J. 581
48 N.J. 581 (1967) 227 A.2d 313 NEW JERSEY CHAPTER, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL PLANNERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LEE T. PURCELL AND DONALD R. GOODKIND, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENERS-APPELLANTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 7, 1966. Decided February 20, 1967
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987-01-27 · Published · cited 16× · 806 F.2d 451
GARTH, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Policemen’s Benevolent Association (PBA) represents police employed by the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT) who on occasion work overtime by testifying at mandatory court hearings, by receiving special police training, and by attending briefings at roll calls. The PBA argues that 29 U.S.C. § 207, the Fair Labor Standards Ac