Cases

WILLIAMSON, /., This custody matter is before the court on Lyudmila Liao’s (“mother”) request for a hearing following the petition for modification filed by Ronald Liao (“father”). Mother and father are the parents of Maximillian Liao, age 8 (DOB 6/2/04). The most recent order of court dated February 19, 2013, adopted the recommendation of the custody conciliator dated February 5, 2013. That most recent order provided shared leg

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING THE OBJECTIONS BY SOCA FUNDING, LLC AND THE TRUSTEE TO THE DEBTOR’S CLAIMED HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction In Texas, broad protection is given to homesteads — even if the debtor asserting the homestead exemption has acted in bad faith. In re McDaniel, 70 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.1995). Indeed, the

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. *717 Zhi Fei Liao petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") order removing him from the United States based upon his alleged commission of a "crime of child abuse, child neglec

658 F.Supp. 1554 (1987) Christina FANG-HUI LIAO, Plaintiff, v. Charles H. DEAN, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-AR-5428-NW. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northwestern Division. May 6, 1987. Ernest N. Blasingame, Jr., Florence, Ala., for plaintiff. Lewis E. Wallace, Acting Gen. Counsel, Justin M. Schwann, Sr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas F

Interim Decision *1446 MILITER OF LILO In Deportation Proceedings A-11828875 Decided by Board March 96,1965 (1) Respondent, a 39-year-old unmarried native of China, with advanced training as a pilot, with skill as a contact lens technician, with the educa- tion, including a college degree, acquired during residence In the United S

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

POOLER, Circuit Judge. Cao He Lin petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming, without opinion, an order from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Cao asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the U.N. Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). As in many such cases, the pivotal issue is petitioner’s credibility, an issue that the IJ det

OPINION RESTANI, Judge: This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56(c) brought by defendant, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”). Customs asks the court to decide, as a matter of law, that plaintiff Skechers

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

GRASZ, Circuit Judge. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") cited Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., doing business as WalMart Distribution Center #7035 ("Wal-Mart"), for two purported violations of OSHA's regulation relating to bloodborne pathogens, 29 C.F.R. § 19

Crothers, Justice. [¶1] Tessa Bride, as personal representative of the estate of John Pelkey, appeals from an order dismissing without prejudice her medical malpractice action against Trinity Hospital, Marc Eichler, M.D., Kim Koo, M.D., and unnamed others. We affirm because Bride failed to serve an affidavit containing an admissible expert opinion supporting a prima facie case of professional negligence within three months of the co

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 19-2781 ____________ EMERALD ZODWA NKOMO, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Lamela v Verticon, Ltd. (2020 NY Slip Op 04214) Lamela v Verticon, Ltd. 2020 NY Slip Op 04214 Decided on July 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Shiao Hwe Hu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, *16seeks review of a July 22, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her second motion to reopen. In re Shiao Hwe Hu, No. A073 448 328 (B.I.A. Jul. 22, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF ERIC HALL SUZANNE H. SEGAL, United States Magistrate Judge. On March 22, 2011, defendants Basic Research, LLC and The Carter-Reed Company, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a “Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Deposition of Plaintiff Eric Hall” (the “Motion to Compel” or “MTC”). The parties

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Shiao Hwe Hu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, *16seeks review of a July 22, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her second motion to reopen. In re Shiao Hwe Hu, No. A073 448 328 (B.I.A. Jul. 22, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

Jenkins, J. *104Alan Richardson appeals from an order granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, Department of Motor Vehicles *105(hereinafter, DMV). Richardson sued the DMV for lifting a suspension against the driver's license of a 93-y

*76 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yun An Zang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 26, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Yun An Zang, No. A077 998 481 (B.I.A. Jun. 26, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We

*76 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yun An Zang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a June 26, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Yun An Zang, No. A077 998 481 (B.I.A. Jun. 26, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case. We