Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LIBERTY BELL CAPITAL II, L.P. v. WARREN HOSPITAL”
ACCEPTED 13-14-00381-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 1/15/2015 3:58:21 PM
In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigationpublic domain
848 F.Supp. 527 (1994) In re ML-LEE ACQUISITION FUND II, L.P. AND ML-LEE ACQUISITION FUND (RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS) II, L.P. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civ. A. No. 92-60-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 31, 1994. *528 *529 *530
Sutton v. Bellpublic domain
683 F.Supp.2d 640 (2010) Gary Wayne SUTTON, Petitioner, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent. No. 3:06-cv-388. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. January 22, 2010. *645 Susanne Bales, Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc., Knoxville, TN, for Petitioner. Andrew H. Smith, Tennessee Attorn
Weber v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institutionpublic domain
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 11) WALTER H. RICE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 11), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, and for g
Warren Publishing Co. v. Spurlockpublic domain
645 F.Supp.2d 402 (2009) WARREN PUBLISHING COMPANY and James Warren, Plaintiffs, v. J. David SPURLOCK d/b/a Vanguard Productions, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-3399. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 4, 2009. *404 Manny D. Pokotilow, Douglas Panzer, Salvatore R. Guerriero, Caesar Rivise Berstein Cohen &
Leonard v. George Washington University Hospitalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against George Washington University Hospital (“Hospital” or “GWUH”), Georgetown University Hospital; Georgetown University (“GTU”), the District of Columbia Met
King v. Bellpublic domain
392 F.Supp.2d 964 (2005) Tommy KING, Petitioner, v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:00-0017. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 27, 2005. *965 *966 *967 Kelley J. Henry, Federal Public Defender's Office, Nashvi
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
721 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2010) HOPE FOR FAMILIES & COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. David WARREN, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Macon County, Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc., and Milton McGregor, Defendants. Case No. 3:06-CV-1113-WKW[WO]. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. June 30, 2010.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.public domain
828 N.E.2d 1155 (2005) 215 Ill.2d 1 293 Ill.Dec. 657 Willard J. KING, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. FIRST CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, d/b/a FCF Funding, Appellee. Ricky Jenkins et al., Appellants, v. Concorde Acceptance Corporation et al., Appellees. Nos. 97263, 97761. Supreme Court of Illinois. April 21, 200
General Motors Corp. v. Bellpublic domain
714 So.2d 268 (1996) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Charles BELL and Charles Bell Motor Company, Inc. Charles BELL and Charles Bell Motor Company, Inc. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and General Motors Acceptance Corporation. 1950506, 1950508. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 20, 1996. Rehearing Application
Sharon Olabisiomotosho v. City of Houston City of Houston P. J. Bartlett K. L. Richards Rene Bertrandpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: The district court granted summary judgment in favor of each defendant. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. Factual & PkoceduRal Background While driving her two children home from school on December 3, 1993, plaintiff-appellant Sharon Olabisiomotosho stopped to help a stranded motorist
Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Correctionspublic domain
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON. THOMAS, Circuit Judge. In this appeal we consider whether the district court erred in denying a writ of habeas corpus sought as to petitioner’s conviction and death sentence. We affirm the district court’s judgment as to the conviction. However, we conclude that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ring v. Arizona, 53
OPALA, Justice, dissenting. This quest by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company [SWB] for a neutral and detached tribunal does not turn on whether the Corporation Commission’s [Commission] public utility ratemaking may be described as “legislative ” but rather on (1) what process is constitutionally due the corporate owners (stockholders) of a public utility when the State, acting in
McComb v. Rosspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ricky McComb has brought this action against several officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) and the District of Columbia (“the District”), claiming he was subjected to an unlawful body cavity search in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the laws of the District of Colum
MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Remand to State Court, (Dkt. No. 2), filed on March 18,-2012. A hearing was held on March 22, 2012. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion and remand this matter to the Superi- or Court of the Virgin Islands. I. Background and Procedur
Greene v. Gerber Products Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER . MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Jeremy Greene and Cetaria Wilkerson (the “Greene Plaintiffs”) commenced a putative class action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Defendant Gerber Products Co., doing business as Nestlé Nutrition^ Nestlé Infant Nutrition or Nestlé Nutrition North America on March 8, 2016. (Greene Compl., Docket Ent
United States v. Louisianapublic domain
ORDER AND RULING ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS AND THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA I. INTRODUCTION As his second term neared its end, Thomas Jefferson wrote: “[T]hat .government ,.. [is] the strongest of which
Howard University v. Watkinspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Howard University (“Howard”) brings this action against Belinda Light-foot Watkins, Howard’s former Acting Dean for Student Life and Activities, for indemnification, fraud, and misrepresentation, based upon Watkins’ actions that resulted in a successful claim of discr