Cases

Matter of Michael L. v Lillian G. (2024 NY Slip Op 05055) Matter of Michael L. v Lillian G. 2024 NY Slip Op 05055 Decided on October 15, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

Moceri v Town of Islip (2024 NY Slip Op 01705) Moceri v Town of Islip 2024 NY Slip Op 01705 Decided on March 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON. In this appeal, Amanda Serrano (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) denial of her fatal claim petition seeking death benefits as a widow under Section 307(3) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 The WCJ determined Claimant failed to establish a val

303 S.C. 500 (1990) 401 S.E.2d 863 Annie Bell McDANIEL and Robert Monroe McDaniel, Respondents v. Della Amanda Greer GREGORY, et al., Defendants, of whom Della Amanda Greer Gregory, Mason Louise (Macie Lou) Greer Whitehead, Lillian Virginia Wilbanks, Lydia Loretta Greer Wilder, Mattie Hazel Greer Brewington, Rufus T. Holcombe, Jr., Sara Frances Holcombe Epps, McBeth Young Long, individually and as Personal Representatives

Haji-Georgi v Wishner (2026 NY Slip Op 00767) Haji-Georgi v Wishner 2026 NY Slip Op 00767 Decided on February 11, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is

MEMORANDUM * This memorandum applies to the parties listed in Exhibit A. James E. Anderson, et al. appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their action, arguing that removal jurisdiction is lacking. We agree, and reverse. Bayer, whose burden it is to establish removal jurisdiction, California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 875 F.8d 831, 838, amended by <

572 N.E.2d 1043 (1991) 213 Ill. App.3d 439 157 Ill.Dec. 579 Arlene BOGOVICH, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Zlatko Bogovich, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NALCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-90-1125. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. April 29, 1991. Perai

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLASSER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Albert Rudgayzer, Michael Amalfitano, and Lillian Ganci (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Google, Inc. (“Google”), alleging violations of the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2712, for purportedly making public their private information without their consent. Two motions are before the court. First, Goo

OPINION OF THE COURT Matthew F. Cooper, J. One of the more encouraging developments that I have *977observed as a judge sitting in a Matrimonial Part in New York County is an increased willingness on the part of divorcing parents to attempt to work together to cooperatively raise their children. And even if real cooperation is not possible, there i

Jennifer Adelakun v. Adeniyi Adelakun, No. 35, September Term, 2024 PENDENTE LITE ALIMONY AND CHILD SUPPORT – INTERLOCUTORY ORDER – APPEALABILITY – MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & JUD. PROC. (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.) § 12-303(3)(v) – ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY – Supreme Court of Maryland held that Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. (1974, 2020 Repl. Vol.) (“CJ”) § 12-303(3)(v), which authorizes appeal of interlocutory orders for payment of money, applies to orders directing payment of money to another person

564 F.2d 304 Eugene MONROE, Leslie Williams, Tim Richards, Wilson Ashby,Susie Hunnicutt, Franklin Harris, Henry Harris, Sr., JohnnySnyder, Daniel Thomas, Jr., Charlie Kiana, Mahlon Mills,Levi A. Mills, Sr., Jenny Sours, Eugene Sours, Joe Harris,Lydia Harris, L. Kasrie, Fredrick Driggs, Abraham Howarth,Edna Outwater, Clara Sampson, Wilfred Lane, Vivian Lane,Charlie Clark, Ingram Melton, William Jones, DouglasSheldon, Sr.,

75-80 Properties, L.L.C., et al. v. RALE, Inc., et al., No. 59, September Term, 2019, Opinion by Booth, J. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – FREDERICK COUNTY ETHICS ORDINANCE APPLICABLE TO ETHICS VIOLATIONS DURING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESS. Under the plain language of the Frederick County Ethics Statute, Maryland Code, General Provisions Article (“GP”) § 5-862, the circuit court was not required to undertake a procedural due process analysis and determine whe

Cutter, J. During the Memorial Day weekend (May 24-27, 1980, inclusive, sometimes hereafter “the 1980 Memorial Day weekend”), the premises of the Depositors Trust Company (“the bank”) in Medford and the adjacent premises (in the same block structure) of Bums Optical and Hearing Aid Center *230(“BOC”) were entered by persons for some time unknown. Substantial sums

Motion to dismiss. Appellant, as executor of his deceased wife's will, filed his first and final account and petition for discharge, in which he alleged that after diligent search and inquiry he had failed to uncover any assets belonging to the estate. The respondents, as legatees under the will, filed their exceptions thereto and a petition for the removal of appellant as executor. By an order bearing date October 7, 1931, the court below directed the appellant to account to the estate for t

515 N.W.2d 628 (1994) 245 Neb. 756 Jaroslav BRTEK, also known as Jerry Brtek, and Lillian L. Brtek, Appellants, v. Lad L. CIHAL and Martha B. Cihal, Appellees. No. S-92-164. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 28, 1994. *632 George H. Moyer, Jr., of Moyer, Moyer, Egley, Fullner & Warnemunde, Madison, for

Bruce Nouri v. Shabnam Dadgar, No. 585, September Term, 2018; Mohammad Ghazirad v. Fatemeh Mojarrad, No. 2273, September Term, 2018. Opinion by Fader, C.J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — FIRST AMENDMENT — RELIGIOUS CONTRACTS Provisions in religious marriage contracts may be enforced by a Maryland court if, but only if, their secular terms are enforceable under neutral principles of contract law. FAMILY LAW — RELIGIOUS CONTRACTS —

Robert F. Cherry, Jr., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, No. 36, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Biran, J. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS – PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS – BREACH OF CONTRACT – Baltimore City maintains a Fire and Police Employees’ Retirement System (the “Plan”) to provide pension benefits to uniformed officers in the City’s police and fire departments. The statute governing the Plan, Article 22 of the Baltimore City Code, provides that a contractual relationship ex

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH DEC 13 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN GURNEY-GOLDMAN, as ) Executor of the Estate of Allan H. Goldman, ) and AMY GOLDMAN FOWLER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1124-JTL ) JANE H. GOLDMAN,

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs commenced the within action alleging that defendants unilaterally increased the percentage of contributions that plaintiffs, retired employees, are required to pay for health insurance benefits in retirement and violated the Contracts Clause and Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, imp